Preview

6.03 Calorimetry Lab

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
199 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
6.03 Calorimetry Lab
Objective - I should identify the density of both water and copper, then calculate my percent error based on the actual measurements.

Hypothesis - If I use the formula for density (Density = Mass / Volume) then I can find the density of water and and a sample of copper.

Procedure - See procedure paper.

Data & Observations -
Material
Sample Size
Mass
Calculated Density
Actual Density
% Error
Copper
6.5 ml
54.7 g
8.4 g/ml
8.933 g/ml
5.96%
Water
50 ml
50 g
1 g/ml
1 g/ml
0%

Analysis -
Density of copper equation: 54.7g / 6.5ml = 8.4 g/ml
Density of water equation: 50g / 50ml = 1g/ml
Percent error of copper: (8.933 - 8.4) / 8.933 x 100 = 5.96%
Percent error of water: (1 - 1) / 1 x 100 = 0%

Conclusion - The experiment went as planned, with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Clean, rinse, and fill a buret with NaOH solution just as you did in last week's experiment. Record the molarity of the NaOH and the initial NaOH volume reading from the buret (+0.02 mL).…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Figure 1: Titration curve of 0.160 grams of an unknown diprotic acid that was dissociated in distilled water. Shown is the pH versus the volume in milliliters of 0.1 M NaOH, a strong base, added to the solution. The initial pH reading of the solution was a pH of 2.60. Although the pH of the ½ equivalence point was unknown, it could be estimated by halving the volume of NaOH used at the first equivalence point. At the first equivalence point, 13.63 milliliters of NaOH had been added to the unknown acid solution.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With my test result, it clearly shows that the concentration of sulfuric acid is 0.05 mol/dm3 using the concentration equation, c= n/v. 25 cm3 of the volume with sodium hydroxide is equal to 0.025 dm3 by dividing a thousand with cm 3 and multiply it with 0.1 mol/ dm3 which is the concentration of sodium hydroxide. With the ratio between sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide is 1 to 2 so, 0.0025 should be divided by 2 and 0.00125 moles of sulfuric acid is come out. Finally, using c = m/v, 0.00125 mole/0.025 dm3 and the answer for concentration of the acid is 0.05 mole/ dm3We started our experiment with the initial volume of 0 cm3 in four trial and all of the trials ended up with the final volume of 25.00cm3 All four indicators with phenolphthalein…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin the experiment, the unknown needs to be determined as an acid or a base by using litmus paper or a pH strip. For the rest of the experiment, if the substance is being handled, gloves and goggles must be worn. Use a clean and dry Erlenmeyer flask and weigh it. Then, some of the unknown will be measured and poured into the flask. Also way the flask and the unknown.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Class average for a 80 and 120 drop count was recorded to be 0.041+/- 0.005 mL/drop. If a graduated cylinder is not available there is another way of adding more of the solution. The disposable pipet can transfer 0.5mL of the solution to the chemical reaction. When comparing a 10mL graduated cylinder, a 100mL beaker, and a 50mL graduated cylinder, the most precision peace of glass wear would be the 10 mL graduated cylinder with the true volume of water (calculated), class average, and uncertainties being 9.7896 +/- 0.05mL. The 50mL graduated cylinder comes in second place with a true volume of water(calculated), class average, and uncertainties being 50.0001 +/- 0.22mL. The third peace of glassware coming in as the least accurate would be the 100 mL beaker with a true volume of water(calculated), class average, and uncertainties being 59.9999 +/- 0.82mL.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alicia and Dan | 7.94 x 10-6 | ± 5.06 x 10-6 | -5571.4% | Uncertainties: 10 mL volumetric flask | ± 0.02 | 25 mL volumetric flask | ± 0.03 | 1 mL volumetric pipet | ± 0.006 | 5 mL volumetric pipet | ± 0.01 | 4 mL volumetric pipet | ± 0.015 | 3 mL volumetric pipet | ± 0.010 | 50 mL graduated…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The standard deviation in the average molarity was 8.9710-4 M. and for the percent variation in average molarity it was 88%. The standard deviation illustrates the percision of the experiment for week one. Being that it is so low, it shows how consistent the results that were taken were. The percent variation shows the accuracy, which was below the 1% maximum. Since the results were both percise and accurate, this shows that the results are reliable…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the first process of the lab, you measure the mass of water transferred from a buret to a beaker, to determine the experimental mass of the water, and the volume of the water collected. We measured the temperature of the water so we could calculate the density of the water, which enabled us to calculate the actual volume of water, by using the density and the measured volume of water. To determine the percent error, we had to subtract the actual volume of water by the experimental volume of water transferred from the buret to the beaker, and then divided it by the actual volume and multiplied it by 100. In the second process, you perform the same steps you did for the buret, but instead, you use a 5.00mL or 10.00mL pipet. You repeated each…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6.03 Calorimetry Lab

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1. The final yield of the cells can be determined by use of an automated cell counter or by use of a hemocytometer (Neubauer chamber). In our laboratory, we determine the number of purified cells in a Neubauer-improved, bright line chamber with V-slash with a depth of 0.1 mm and a counting area of 0.0025 mm2 from Marienfeld (Lauda Königshofen, Germany, PN # 0650030). 2. For determination of the final cell yield, mix a 10 µl aliquot of the purified cells (Figure 9D) with 10 µl of trypan blue solution (Figure 9E).…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Density of Four Metals

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Overall, errors were low, falling between 0.25% and 2.67%. In this lab, there were many possible sources of error which may have impacted results. First, many of the metal samples may not have been cut to exact measurement by machines therefore leading to altered results for the mass of the samples. Second, many of the samples of the metals may have oxidized over time leading to differences. Third, the digital scale may not have been tarred to because the scale was quite sensitive in the fact that the mass of the samples kept changing while measuring due to outside forces like wind and air from breathing. These errors probably led to my results of actual density always being higher than the expected density.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Density Lab Report

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The purpose of this experiment is find the density of two metals using their mass and volume.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Copper Rod Error

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Since there are differences in the measured data; the calculation of density varies. There are 3 variables that we have to take into account for calculating the density of the copper rod. The length plays the largest role in the uncertainty of the copper rod’s density since it has the largest deviation. The Vernier calipers were the most accurate because it showed the smallest deviation.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Water Density Lab Report

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Data tables A. Qualitative table\ Sample number and name Color Solid # 1 (Al Shot) Silver Solid # 2 (Steel Shot) Brown/Copper water Clear Vegetable oil Light Yellow Mineral oil Clear Color/ Appearance of Samples B. Quantitative Liquid Data Table Water Vegetable Oil Mineral Oil Mass of empty pipet (g) 0.87 0.80 0.88 Mass of pipet and liquid (g) 6.27 5.78 5.45 Mass of liquid (g) 5.40 4.98 4.57 Volume of liquid (mL) 5.32 5.21 5.31 Density of liquid (g/mL) 1.02 0.956 0.861 Specific gravity of liquid No specific gravity for water .937 .844 C. Quantitative Solid Data Table Solid 1 Solid 2 Mass of solid (g) 18.35 49.57 Water volume at start (mL) 31.3 29.2 Water volume after solid is added (mL) 37.9 35.7 Volume of solid (mL) 6.6 6.5 Density of solid (g/mL) 2.78 7.63 Specific gravity of solid 2.73 7.48 II.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DENSITY

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Firstly we obtained three different solids a piece of aluminum, a piece of copper and a piece of iron, and we measured their masses by using the balance. Also, we measured their volume by using a cylinder with distilled water, then we have measured the volume, and then we put in the metal and recorded the total volumes. After that we calculated each density and we recorded the average density (by classmates). Also, I found the literature density through a web search. Finally we calculated the percentage error by using the following formula: (Density from data – Density from literature) / Density from literature * 100…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Uncertainty

    • 3975 Words
    • 16 Pages

    All measurements have inherent uncertainty. We therefore need to give some indication of the reliability of measurements and the uncertainties in the results calculated from these measurements. When processing your experimental results, a discussion of uncertainties should be included. When writing the conclusion to your lab report you should evaluate your experiment and its results in terms of the various types of errors. To better understand the outcome of experimental data an estimate of the size of the systematic errors compared to the random errors should be considered. Random errors are due to the accuracy of the equipment and systematic errors are due to how well the equipment was used or how well the experiment was controlled. We will focus on the types of experimental uncertainty, the expression of experimental results, and a simple method for estimating experimental uncertainty when several types of measurements contribute to the final result.…

    • 3975 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays