Preview

Abilene Paradox Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4895 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abilene Paradox Summary
We present with pride the following reprint of an article from our Summer 1974 issue. If you haven’t already read this classic article on the management of agreementand the catastrophes that result when it is mismanaged-you’re in for a treat. If you have read it, you’re in for another treat: Harveys epilogue, which immediately follows the article, and commentaries by Rosabeth Moss Ranter and Arthur Elliott Carlisle, immediately following the epilogue. Together, the commentaries by Kanter and Carlisle form, in effect, an ‘Abilene Defense’Lor ways to fend off an Abilene Paradox. No actual silver stake is recommended, just some canny advice on how to maneuver to keep people fxom rushing into agreementout of politeness, a misguided sense of the …show more content…

And for most of those organizations, the negative consequences of such trips, measured in terms of both human misery and economic loss, have been much greater than for our little Abilene group. This article is concerned with that paradox- the Abilene Paradox. Stated simply, it is as follows: Organizations frequently take actions in contradiction to what they really want to do and therefore defeat the very purposes they are trying to achieve. It also deals with a major corollary of the paradox, which is that the inability to manage agreement is a major source of organization dysfunction. Last, the article is designed to help members of organizations cope more effectively with the paradox’s pernicious influence. As a means of accomplishing the above, I shall: (1) describe the symptoms exhibited by organizations caught in the paradox; (2) describe, in summarized case-study examples, how they occur in a variety of organizations; (3) discuss the underlying causal dynamics; (4) indicate some of the implications of accepting this model for describing organizational behavior; (5) make recommendations for coping with the paradox; and, in conclusion, (6) relate the paradox to a broader existential …show more content…

Organization members agree privately, as individuals, as to the nature of the situation or problem facing the organization. For example, members of the Abilene group agreed that they were enjoying themselves sitting in front of the fan, sipping lemonade, and playing dominoes. 2. Organization members agree privately, as individuals, as to the steps that would be required to cope with the situation or problem they face. For members of the Abilene group “more of the same” was a solution that would have adequately satisfied their individual and collective desires. 3. Organization members fail to accurately communicate their desires and/or beliefs to one another. In fact, they do just the opposite and thereby lead one another into misperceiving the collective reality. Each member of the Abilene group, for example, communicated inaccurate data to other members of the organization. The data, in effect, said, “Yeah, it’s a great idea. Let’s go to Abilene,” when in reality members of the organization individually and collectively preferred to stay in Coleman. 4. With such invalid and inaccurate information, organization members make collective decisions that lead them to take actions contrary to what they want to do, and thereby arrive at results that are counterproductive to the organization’s intent and purposes. Thus, the Abilene group went to Abilene when it preferred to do something else. 5. As a result of taking actions that are counterproductive, organization members

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Qlt1 Task 3

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    |4. |Co-operation – Working together as a group to understand each|4. |Group members not coming up with sensible ideas to |…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this work MGT 415 Week 5 Final Paper you will find the overview of the following topic: "Group Dynamics and Interaction. Group Behavior in Organizations."…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    MGT 291 Study Guide

    • 3932 Words
    • 16 Pages

    -Actions and attitudes of individuals and groups toward one another and toward the organization as a whole, and its effect on the organization’s functioning and performance…

    • 3932 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    CO2520 Final Review

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    9) John Oetzel found that which communication processes led to task effectiveness and member satisfaction in many small group situations?…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TDA 2.6 1.1

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think that for any team to be successful it requires those people to have common/collective understanding of what their aims and objectives are.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    6. Katherine's project team is extremely cohesive; it has become a norm to cooperate and agree with one another. Although Katherine disagrees with some of the influential members in the group who have decided that they do not need to conduct interviews as part of their data collection, she doesn't question their decision. As a result, the group falls prey to:…

    • 5483 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brockmann, Erich. (1996, May). Removing the paradox of conflict from group decisions. Academy of Management Executive. v10n2, p. 61-62.…

    • 5037 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Decisions aren’t made straight easily with a group of people . People within the group position view as they attempt to establish themselves in relation to other team members and the leader, who might receive challenges from team members. Clarity of purpose increases but plenty of uncertainties persist. Cliques and factions form and there may be power struggles. The team needs to be focused on its goals to avoid becoming distracted by relationships and emotional issues. Compromises may be required to enable progress.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discussion Notes

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    PART 1: From your school, work, or volunteer experience, think of a group of which you have been a member. Do you believe the members of the group communicated effectively or ineffectively? Explain the reasons for your answer and give examples. Did the group experience any conflict? If so, what strategies were employed to manage it and do you believe they were effective?…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of the Abilene Paradox, “a circumstance where a group of individuals agree to a course of action based on the theory it is best for the group despite going against the preferences of members of the group,” (What Is Abilene Paradox? Definition and Meaning).…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first part of the article begins by explaining how within the public and even within groups all sets of views or values are not universal. This means that it is a challenge to represent the views of groups. This also means that members of groups need to stand up for their views. For example, if you are part of a human rights organization, but do not approve of their stated views on a particular country, you should make your voice heard. This presents a challenge to group leadership because they have to make the group’s stated views more general in order to not alienate any of the participants. In addition, people do not have a general view on how decisions should be made. For example, the article mentioned how the activist AIDS organization, ACT UP, had a great deal of trouble coming up with a consensus about whether or not they should testify in front of Congress. These facts mean that the views and perspectives of a group of people, their subjectivity, is more of an ever-changing process than a static group of opinions and should be treated as such. This idea is significant to communication as a whole because it helps understand why it is important to constantly make sure that no one’s views in a group are being marginalized.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4) Groupthink is when individuals held back their stating views in a meeting and agreed to someone else's position or can go along with the boss suggestion when in fact the individual disagreed with suggestions. These caused a highly cohesive teams to lose their critical evaluative capabilities. There are several symptoms of groupthink such as illusions of invulnerability, Belief in inherent group morality, self-censorship by members, illusions of unanimity, mind guarding, rationalizing unpleasant and disconfirming data. Illusions of invulnerability are one symptom of groupthink because the members who form part of the team assume that the team is well capable of criticism or is beyond attack. The belief in inherent group morality…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Challenger space shuttle explosion. The Bay of Pigs invasion. The Korean War debacle (Janis 1-28). These are examples of situations where group communication failed. Group communication involves a shared identity among three or more people, a considerable amount of interaction among these people, and a high level of interdependence between everyone involved (Trenholm 196-97). It is essential to understand group dynamics for a variety of reasons. Everyone participates in groups throughout the course of a lifetime, and these groups are often very goal-oriented. The business community, non-profit organizations, and town governments all use groups to make decisions. Sometimes a condition known as Groupthink can occur in groups that are extremely task-oriented and goal-driven. Groupthink is as "a mode of thinking people engage in when cohesiveness is high" (Blumberg and Golembiewski 134). Groupthink leads to poor decision making and results in a lack of creativity. Although Groupthink has been studied extensively, many people are unaware of its dynamics and the consequences that they might induce. This paper was designed to raise awareness about Groupthink and to provide some suggestions that can help task-oriented groups avoid this condition. To understand Groupthink it is essential to have a basic familiarity with group communication dynamics. Once this is accomplished some symptoms of Groupthink will be explored and some solutions will be offered.…

    • 1752 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group communication relies on prior understanding of the group objectives and the group's culture. Unlike individual communication, individuals in a group do not provide feedback directly to one another. Rather, they provide feedback to be addressed by the entire group. With group communication, every participant’s input is necessary to help the group comprehend the objectives so that the whole group can benefit and arrive at mutual understanding. Therefore, in individual communication, the exchange of ideas and opinion is specific to the two individuals involved. Whereas, group communication involves many people and the communication is not specific to just one person. Group communication includes the input of many people which makes the process more difficult. Everyone in the group contributes ideas that need consideration. Members of a group want to feel that their input is having impact on the group dynamics.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The theme of this case is that not providing enough guidance, direction, and support to group members can be interpreted negatively by group.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays