Preview

Abramowitz: Polarization In Today's World

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
473 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abramowitz: Polarization In Today's World
During our class discussion last week, we discussed about the polarization in our society in today’s world. In the reading by Abramowitz, he stated, “That problem was polarization. According to these observers, the sharp divisions between Democratic and Republican leaders were driving a wedge between party supporters in the electorate and alienating many moderate citizens from the political process.” This statement by Abramowitz shows us that Congress is still divided after decades of creating a political system to run America. We as a society need to be able to work together as a whole instead of being divided. There have been leaders in our society that tried to bring us together. However, no matter how hard they try to bring great minds …show more content…
Also, we as a society cannot achieve better if we work alone compare to working together. Such as, neanderthal and how they weren’t able to survive compared to us (homosapien). Neanderthal is a specie that works alone and are powerful. However, they dislike working together as a whole. They have so much potential to be the strongest specie on this world, but the one reason that brought them to extinction is their choice of working alone instead of together. We (homosapien) ended up being superior since we are able to group up and work together to survive. Division is the number one problem and if we are able to fix it, we can be greater and better as a whole. To bring this discussion back, I believe that cooperation is one of the most important trait to develop. It’s better to have help than to just try to accomplish a problem by oneself. Cooperation is one of the few traits that we don’t value as much as other traits until we see how much effect it has on us. However, as society advances, it still leaves us with a question regarding collaboration and division, will society choose to be divided or will they realize the value in working together as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aldrich claims that a series of gradual changes in the political institutions caused the current dysfunction. He discusses five different periods of time beginning with the “Founding”, Aldrich describes the creation of a government founded on separation of powers as one of the first requirements of the gridlock that characterizes modern politics. The second requirement of gridlock is the two-party system which emerged early in the United State’s existence. While these two characteristics, worked for a small, agrarian, and homogenous society that existed in the 1800s, today the two party system coupled with the separation of powers causes legislative gridlock as parties become more polarized and more competitive. Continuing to “Antebellum”, Aldrich points to the increase in voting rights and the rise of more ambitious political actors.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Incoming graduates of political science are aware of the restriction that the structure of the government imbeds, including the branches of the government generating unfair control of power in the executive branch, and partisan polarization. America’s basic construction of government, the three branches in parallel with the checks and balance system, creates problems such as a single executive leader inducing unfair policy making, and two main political party advancing partisan polarization. Partisan polarization is the ideology that an individual’s stance on political controversies are limiting of their party identification: republican, democrat. For example, controversies today revealing partisan polarizations are: equal reproductive rights,…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Goverment Shutdown

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Group size has an unprecedented impact on the nature of social interaction. Studies have shown that as group size increase individuals typically reduce their efforts. Imagine something as gigantic as our government, between the House and the Senate there are five hundred and thirty five members in the United States Congress. Groups of that magnitude fall victim to groupthink, or decision making that ignores alternate solutions in order to keep group harmony. Although after reading this article I highly doubt there will be any harmony between the two political parties anytime soon. The article describes how members of Congress followed the example of their party instead of looking for alternative solutions.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the readings of the four articles, they have address the problem with polarization in the people and cultural division. In Wilson's and Fiornia's articles they both mention how there is a deep division in America but Fiornia believes that the American public are more concerned about solving their political problems than the division. According to Wilson, he's view are some-what opposite, he believes that this cultural division will not fade since it was born when this country started. In Judis's article, he also mentions the division in the American public, but he chooses the popular group that has the media's eye which is the Tea Parties. He mentions how there is a division between the Tea Parties and the government and that some of their problems will fade. In the article of my choosing which was Partisan Mood: Polarization and the Dynamics of Mass Party Preferences, was about how the American public are categorized in political groups or parties due to their personal, political or religious views. Even though some of these articles are about the division between small political parties or the division of the Republicans and Democrats, there are still a division in America which can be harmful to trying to keep the United States united.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After reading “The Polarized Public? Why American Government is so dysfunctional” and further looking upon the PEW research center as well as ANES data base Abramowitz seems to have categorized the factors that influence the polarization, and it seems that the divided in belief and opinions have widened, and are now deeply influential to political parties and government fundamentals, as the polarization is found in…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Controversy on issues like gun control, stem cell research, assisted suicide, global warming, and more are pushing us further apart. The main reason for this is because technology has given us the luxury of watching the news 24/7 instead of doing our own research. When these topics are discussed, people are so fixated on being right that we forget to try and find a solution. Nowadays our sources we receive our information from are biased and not truly based on facts, thus giving everyone a different side of the same story. Similar to Rome that was divided into two empires, we are divided into two different parties.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, politics gets in the way of what the people want. One thing we see far too often is voting along party lines when the people want change. All it does is promote one party’s agenda instead of doing what the people want. One example is the Iran Nuclear Deal, 49% of voters were against the deal and only 21% were for it (Pew Research Center). Meanwhile in the Senate the Deal was upheld and the will of the people was disreguarded.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress Dbq

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Obviously, it is difficult to keep track of a representatives every move in the deep dark chamber of congress[Doc G]. In some congress people’s opinion, this anonymity leads them to believe that they don’t have any responsibility to their constituents. This is a classic example a a psychological phenomenon called groupthink, in which anonymity provides a cover for risky and generally worse decision. But, because of the anonymity and the feeling of a responsibility to political parties, the central goal of a legislator can be skewed. A solution to this problem could be the increasing involvement people in the processes of democracy[Doc D]. This should also be the goal of the congress people, not ties to an established political party or group. The people need to be constantly engaged in the processes of their democracy, not only the presidential election. Politicians have to be elected consistently, this should not be intertwined with getting in the favor of political organizations they are associated with [Doc C]. Establishing a role to the people, and the people a role creates a system beneficial for everyone involved. Then political election will be the result of what policy they make, and what policies people vote…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Polarization In Congress

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Representatives may vote against a bill primarily due to a squabble they have with a bill supporter, or his party. In “Polarizing Cues,” writer Nicholson explains his research and how he found that “in-party leader cues do not persuade but that out-party leader cues polarize” (1). Further, because they choose these actions, they take polarization to an exceedingly uncooperative level. In other words, instead of agreeing with those who share their ideals, the congressmen improve their credentials by striving to disagree with their opponents. These congressmen commit such acts primarily due to their polarized nature; ideally, polarized leaders should not disagree with another purely based on their credentials. Nicholson also explains that parties serve as tentative psychological in- and out-groups, which influence a voting politician’s decisions (1). While he contends that politicians themselves serve as polarizing cues, he discusses their positions as in- and out-group politicians based on the political parties. Therefore, polarization also stems from political parties. In removing the bipartisan system, perpetrators of such actions also disappear; the removal of political parties also implies a lack of party lines, the main cause of such polarized…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The polarization of individual viewpoints and political ideologies has become a matter of increasing concern in the United States. In the words of Professor Cass Sunstein of the Harvard Law School, “The greatest danger of the echo chambers is unjustified extremism...if you get a group of people who tend to think something, after they talk to each other, they end up thinking a more extreme version of what they thought before.” We as individuals tend to seek discussions that support our own beliefs, pushing us into echo chambers that reverberate with our own ideologies. This drives us farther and farther apart from those who hold opposing viewpoints.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My fellow Americans, I have come to speak to you about the partisanship that we see in our government. We as Americans are witnessing a time where our government corporate with one another in the worst way possible. A time where bipartisanship has torn our government up greatly. A time were the gridlock in Congress ceases our ability to boost the economy and create jobs. A time where our government officials are more concentrated on the needs of their individual party then the needs of the American people. The fact the some in Congress may much rather see their opponents lose than to see America win, is extremely disappointing. People we have many options in this great country we live in. But what is not in option is for us to allow Washington…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What Is Partisanship?

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Partisanship is, as we have seen, a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it deepens divides that lead to political stalemates. On the other hand, it also motivates participation in democracy, especially in today’s atmosphere. Farrell has observed that partisanship, in some ways, has “saved” citizenship because it has increased participation – at the cost of consensus. He emphasizes, “The rebirth of civic participation this year [2008] is not a product of experiments in deliberative democracy or a new interest in league bowling.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A House Divided

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Discuss the relevance today of Abraham Lincoln’s statement, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Small Groups

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One of the main topics James Surowiecki concentrates on is, “group polarization.” This is when a few members of the small group takes a side on the extreme opposites. Some of the group might be on the extreme yes side, while others are on the extreme no side. Surowiecki touches on the downfalls of group polarization in small groups by saying, “Deliberation does not moderate, but rather radicalizes people’s point of view.” (Surowiecki Page 479)What Surowiecki is saying is that when in a discussion in a small group the topic of deliberation makes people side with an extreme, there really is no middle ground when people make their decisions. Group polarization is so common among small groups there have been…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    So, we organize cooperatives for solving common pressing problems we, each, cannot solve separately. Or they are organized to serve the interests of their members in earning their living much more advantageous than they act individually.…

    • 6407 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays