Preview

According To Singer's Etymologically, What Does Philosophy Mean?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3036 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
According To Singer's Etymologically, What Does Philosophy Mean?
PHIL 2200 REVIEW QUESTIONS1) Etymologically, what does Philosophy mean?
Ancient Greek: Philo – Love, Sophia – Wisdom/knowledge. The love of wisdom.2) What is epistemology?
Theories of knowledge
3) What is ontology?
The study of being.4) What is ethics?
A system of moral principles.5) According to Singer, what are four things that ethics are not?
Particularly concerned with sex
An ideal system which is useless in practice
Something only intelligible in context with religion
Relative or Subjective
6) Explain Singer’s argument against Deontology.
Singer says that the rules of deontology contradict each other. He thinks that it is not sophisticated enough and needs a hierarchy.
7) Why does Singer think that ethics cannot be relative?
…show more content…
Are and must be universal.
8) Explain what it means to say that ethics involves a movement from the descriptive to the prescriptive.
Ethic involves a movement from saying how things are – to how things ought to be.
9) What does deontology mean?
The science/study of duty.10) What is the difference between a hypothetical imperative and a categorical imperative?
A hypothetical imperative represents a practical necessity concerned with the end. A Categorical imperative requires necessary action with no regard to ends.
11) What is Kant’s Categorical Imperative?
Kant says there is but one categorical imperative, “Act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law.”
12) What is the difference between a priori and a posteriori?
A priori – Prior to experience
A posteriori – That which comes after experience.
13) Why is autonomy important for Kant?
Autonomy – The ability to act morally objective rather than under the influence of personal desires. It allows us to assume we can treat others as ends, and will be treated as ends in ourselves.
14) What is
…show more content…
Trying to assimilate differences under a similarity. (All desks are called desk.)
91) According to Nietzsche, what is truth?
A movable set of metaphors, metonymies and anthropomorphisms.
92) According to Nietzsche, what does it mean to be truthful?
To repeat the “lies of the herd.” Use the usual metaphors.
93) According to Nietzsche, how would one express truthfulness morally?
Tell the conventionally lies. You are being moral if you uphold the metaphors.
94) Why is truth telling utterly unimpressive?
Because it’s just repetition of something that was created by humanity.95) According to Nietzsche, why can science do no better at ascertaining truth?
It is just another structure to measure the world through our own metaphors. It is exactly as unimpressive as other truth telling.
96) What is the fundamental human drive according to Nietzsche?
The formation of metaphors. We have a fundamental drive towards being deceived and deceiving ourselves.
97) Why was Patricia Williams’ son believed to be color blind?
After being reinforced that “color doesn’t matter” he refused to recognize color. The teachers assumed there was a problem with the child, rather than realizing it was an effect of their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    HU4640 Project Part1

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This paper is going to discuss Ethics and Ethical Theories. It will include an introduction to ethical theories, virtue ethics, and care ethics. There will be sections discussing absolutism versus relativism, consequentialism versus deontological ethics, and lastly, free will versus determinism. It will also include a discussion about the study of morality and identify which of the approaches (Scientific, Philosophical, or Theological/Religious) are closest to my own personal beliefs. There will be a discussion regarding the three sources of ethics and what they are based on (Reason, Emotion, and Intuitionism).…

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    1.1. Defined as the flexibility from outside control or leadership, the word autonomy comes from the early 17th century; from the Greek word autonomia meaning ‘having its own laws,’ from auto: ‘self’, nomos: ‘laws’. Independent is defined just as autonomy is. Independent came from the early 16th century. Psychologically, the issue is defining what the “authentic self.” It‘s defined as the ability to make choices of one’s own free will (M.D., 2012). Jane Dryden defined autonomy as an individual’s capacity for self-determination or self-governance.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "What Is Empathy? — PsyBlog." Psychology Studies Relevant to Everyday Life from PsyBlog. Web. 06 Dec. 2011. <http://www.spring.org.uk/2007/01/what-is-empathy.php>.…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2.Which of the ethical theories discussed in this reading do you believe best account for the rightness/wrongness of actions? Explain.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his publication, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant supplies his readers with a thesis that claims morality can be derived from the principle of the categorical imperative. The strongest argument to support his thesis is the difference between actions in accordance with duty and actions in accordance from duty. To setup his thesis, Kant first draws a distinction between empirical and "a priori" concepts. Empirical concepts are ideas we reach from our experiences in the world. On the other hand and in contrast, "a priori" concepts are ideas we reach as an end point of reasoning prior to or apart from any experience of how things occur in the world. Kant then claims that moral actions are supposed done for the reason of morality alone. This train of thought leads to the conclusion that an understanding of morality must be based on "a priori" concepts of reason. Truly moral ideas are then universally valid if and only if they are based on "a priori" concepts.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presocratics, regarded as the first philosophers, brought the term logos to philosophy (literal translation: ‘word’; also denotes ‘logic’, ‘argument’, ‘reason’. Aristotle’s concept of Virtue Ethics regards humans as rational animals, implying that ‘logos’ is purely a human trait. Known as Plato’s most gifted student, Aristotle disagreed with his teacher’s view that the “essence of reality lies in some abstract world of Forms or Ideas” (Brannigan, 2005:60). Aristotle’s point of view directly contrasts his teacher’s, stating that the “source of meaning comes from concrete, physical reality” (Brannigan, 2005:60). This direct contrast with Plato leads to Aristotle opening his own school, which he called the Lyceum. Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics is his literary formation of his ethical theories.…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crimes and Misdemeanors

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the final scene when Louis Levy speaks of the capacity of love I feel he is saying that we as humans have this natural need for an emotional attachment in order to feel complete as a person. Everyone on this earth is looking for love and acceptance and this starts from birth. A baby requires love, attention, physical touch and maternal nurturing along with biological needs in order to survive. This is carried on throughout out a person’s life. If one can look back as far as possible into their childhood they will come to find that love from another being is essential to growth because this will be the basis of what kind of adult you will grow up to be, you seek acceptance from anyone, be it your mother, father, siblings or friends and even a pet, and to be important and needed and loved is vital for a person to have a sense of self-worth. If there is anything lacking in these personal requirements, then a person will most likely grow up insecure about oneself and question what their purpose in life is if they cannot have ever lasting love.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The categorical imperative is an objective imperative, making one morally required to act according to it without exception. It addresses our maxims, the reasons why we act, rather than our actions; and it focuses on the respect for all people. These maxims come from a sense of duty and must have moral worth; they are made universal by having reason in view and using logic as the standard of judgment. If I believed it was best to steal a car for myself, and therefore believed everyone should steal cars; the notion of property is undermined and the maxim self-destructs because there would be no one’s property left to steal. Using reason, we can identify the logical contradiction when we universalize this impermissible maxim and can form categorical, universally binding rules on all rational agents.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    discussion questions

    • 1039 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Complete the following statements by filling in the blanks with either “moral” or “nonmoral” (eg., factual, scientific, legal):…

    • 1039 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality "The good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes or because of it's adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it's willing, i.e., it is good of itself". A maxim is the generalized rule that characterizes the motives for a person's actions. For Kant, a will that is good is one that is acting by the maxim of doing the right thing because it is right thing to do. The moral worth of an action is determined by whether or not it was acted upon out of respect for the moral law, or the Categorical Imperative. Imperatives in general imply something we ought to do however there is a distinction between categorical imperatives and hypothetical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives are obligatory so long as we desire X. If we desire X we ought to do Y. However, categorical imperatives are not subject to conditions. The Categorical Imperative is universally binding to all rational creatures because they are rational. Kant proposes three formulations the Categorical Imperative in his Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Moral, the Universal Law formulation, Humanity or End in Itself formulation, and Kingdom of Ends formulation. In this essay, the viablity of the Universal Law formulation is tested by discussing two objections to it, mainly the idea that the moral laws are too absolute and the existence of false positives and false negatives.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rationality depends heavily on the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative is universally binding to all rational creatures to guide the good will and cause us to be moral. Without morals and the categorical imperative we cannot be rational.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will explain Kant’s Principle of Universalizability and whether or not is captures the difference between right and wrong conduct. I will then take a look at objections to the Principle of Universalizability and consider the Kantian response.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Categorical Imperative

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Principle of Morality also known as the Categorical Imperative is Kant’s main focus in his philosophic theory. The Categorical Imperative can also be described as an unconditional command. There is only one Categorical Imperative but there are three different formulations that Kant has created. The first formulation of the Categorical Imperative as quoted by Kant is, “Act only according to the maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” In other words this formulation of the Categorical Imperative can be said that when each individual determines that everyone, including themselves, will always act the same way to the same general rule. In order for a person to be a moral and good person they will have to follow this formulation of the Categorical Imperative. This is the most confusing but important part of Kant’s ethical theory.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dert

    • 3622 Words
    • 15 Pages

    1) Act as if your maxim were a universal law of nature. What if everybody did this action? A "maxim" is a personal principle of action, such as "I will never lie," "stealing is wrong." If your maxim is not one that can be universalized, then it does not issue from the categorical imperative. For example, if your maxim was "lying is permissible", then human relationships would not be possible because we would not know who to trust. This formulation, then, can be summed up with the question, "What if everyone did this"?…

    • 3622 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    philosophy

    • 2881 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1. Explain the difference between Value Theory, Normative Ethics, and Metaethics. Give an example of a claim from each area, and explain why each claim falls into the category it does.…

    • 2881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays