Preview

Objections to the First Formulation of Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1561 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Objections to the First Formulation of Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay Example
Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality "The good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes or because of it's adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it's willing, i.e., it is good of itself". A maxim is the generalized rule that characterizes the motives for a person's actions. For Kant, a will that is good is one that is acting by the maxim of doing the right thing because it is right thing to do. The moral worth of an action is determined by whether or not it was acted upon out of respect for the moral law, or the Categorical Imperative. Imperatives in general imply something we ought to do however there is a distinction between categorical imperatives and hypothetical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives are obligatory so long as we desire X. If we desire X we ought to do Y. However, categorical imperatives are not subject to conditions. The Categorical Imperative is universally binding to all rational creatures because they are rational. Kant proposes three formulations the Categorical Imperative in his Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Moral, the Universal Law formulation, Humanity or End in Itself formulation, and Kingdom of Ends formulation. In this essay, the viablity of the Universal Law formulation is tested by discussing two objections to it, mainly the idea that the moral laws are too absolute and the existence of false positives and false negatives.
The first formulation of the Categorical Imperative is defined by Kant to "act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law". Good moral actions are those of which are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s deontological theory of ethics is the normative ethical position that evaluates the morality of actions. Unlike the empiricist supporters of Utilitarianism, Kant was an unquestionable supporter of rationalism; the idea that pure reason can tell us how the world is, independent of experience. This idea is referred to as an a priori approach, because it makes the assumption that reasoning or knowledge is denoted from theoretical deduction rather than from observation or experience.…

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eth316 Week 1 Individual

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is not one single deontological theory but Kant is held as the standard by many. Deontological ethics judges morality based on one’s obedience to rules. Kant believed that nothing in the world could be good without qualification except good will, therefore, deontology suggest that all actions must be measured by their adherence to rules or duty and not the effects they produce.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The word Deon is the Greek word for “duty” which is the central focus on Kant’s moral reasoning. It is the fulfillment of one’s moral duties and obligations to do the right thing because it is the right thing to do by the use of reason, logic, critical thinking and moral intuition, the moral duty to just do the right thing. The main ethical reasoning of Kant’s deontological ethics is based upon the concepts of duty and goodwill, the intention to do the right thing because it is the right thing to do which should be based on consistent and logical thinking and putting aside our personal interests and…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the four deontological systems that we have discussed, I would like to share my thoughts about the Kantian Deontological System. Kantian Ethics is formulated by Immanuel Kant in which he discussed that the nature of duty is based on human reason. For him, human reason, not human nature, can determine what is right and wrong. He also stressed that human desires are not the right measurement for ethics. In addition, Kantian Ethics is known for its two kinds of command or imperative: the hypothetical and categorical imperative. According to Immanuel Kant, hypothetical imperative has conditions and has no value. We do a certain action or decision because we are waiting for something in return or because we are afraid of punishment. On the other…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant’s formulas are then treated as candidates for a universal moral criterion for the permissibility of maxims, to be tested against our intuitions regarding the best cases that inventive philosophers can devise as apparent counterexamples. If one interpretation of Kant’s formula yields counterintuitive results, then another interpretation is proposed. The fate of Kantian ethics itself, as a moral theory, is then seen as depending on this enterprise of interpretation, and how well our best interpretation of Kant’s principle fares against our intuitions about the most challenging examples against which we can test…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Prisoner Doctors

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant, I. (1990). “Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals.” Exploring philosophy: an introductory anthology (4th ed., pp. 415-420). New York: Oxford University Press.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immanuel Kant states that the only thing in this world that is “good without qualification” is the good will. He states the attributes of character such as intelligence, wit, and judgment are considered good but can be used for the wrong reasons. Kant also states that the attributes of good fortune such as health, power, riches, honor, that provide one happiness can also be used in the wrong way (7). In order to understand Kant’s view of moral rightness, one must understand that only a good will is unambiguously good without qualification, it is “good in itself”. To clarify, Kant states that “a good will is good not because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end; it is good only through its willing, i.e. it is good in itself” (7). To Kant, a good will is the only thing that gives action moral worth. Human beings were granted with reason not only to attain self-preservation and a state of happiness, but “its true function must be to produce a will which is not merely good as a mean to some further end, but it good in itself” (9). Human beings are called to exercise reason through duty to bring a universal good to all. This duty, living according to our highest reason, must be exercised through action that is beneficial and non-contradictory to all. Duty has three major qualifications for Kant. One must recognize that duty is good in itself when an action is performed out of the need of the completion of the duty itself, such as one who abstains from supporting a large restaurant corporation that inhumanely raise cattle or poultry, because he or she recognizes that it is a duty to not perpetuate unethical practice. Or one who carefully recycles their waste not because of the pleasure of being an enlightened “green” individual, but because of the recognition that it is “good in itself” to reuse products. The second…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Evolution of Slavery

    • 848 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the development of the cotton gin in 1793, the South produced over half of the world’s supply of cotton and accounted for half of all American exports after 1840. Cotton quickly became a vital economic factor in the United States as well as on an international level. Britain, the leading industrial power at the time, depended on southern cotton to manufacture cotton cloth which was Britain’s most important single manufactured item. This newly acquired international dependency on cotton dramatically altered the social and political history of the South.…

    • 848 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 3033

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory begins from the starting point of the good will. In assessing the moral worth on an action we must focus not on the consequences of results of the action, but on the agent’s will ( the motivation of conducting an action is really important).…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    kant

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant’s diagnoses the human condition as human’s frailty and impurity when distinguishing between one’s self interested inclinations and moral duty. Humans were “…finite beings with our individual needs…yet we [were] also rational beings, and for Kant that include[d]…the recognition of moral obligations” (Stevenson and Haberman p.155). The contrast and ever-apparent strain between these opposing sides of human nature fuel Kant’s diagnosis of human’s frailty. In Kant’s conception of human reason and action, he distinguished between categorical and hypothetical imperatives which displayed the human struggles regarding what decisions were morally right. Self interested desires, “…which involve[ed] only the selection of means to satisfy one’s own desire” (p.151) could be defined as a hypothetical imperative. However, categorical imperative claims “…that morality is fundamentally a function of [one’s] reason, not just [one’s] feelings” (p.151). Knowing what was morally right and doing what was morally right was the depravity of human nature, the choice of choosing one’s own happiness over their obligations to those who surround them. The desire for instant gratification from any action hinders human’s consideration of longer-term self-interest. The difficulty arises when the one must decide to postpone immediate satisfaction in the interest of future goals; a “…balance to strike between living for the moment and planning for the future….” (p.155) must be reached. Human’s struggles with moral decisions and personal gain exemplify their…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay I will present an argument to show that Kantian Deontology is not a plausible moral theory because the two fundamental principles from Kant’s Categorical Imperatives are unable to account for the permissibility of certain acts that would otherwise be considered immoral. This would discredit the usefulness of Kant’s theory as a moral guideline because individuals would then be able to commit acts - those of which would be considered immoral according to considered moral judgements - and yet not be proven morally wrong because of the lack of accountability that the principles have. In addition, Kant’s theory would no longer have the value of helping us lead a morally good life - even as a form of moral guideline - than the initial…

    • 2494 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontology steps in where utilitarianism fails, utilitarianism fails in the idea that there are absolutely morally forbidden actions. But, in reality, even the worst actions are not always wrong, given extreme circumstances. Deontology is all about duty and moral laws. For instance, if a person does a good act, and it has a good outcome, from a utilitarianistic view, this person was right. However, in deontological view, this person is only right if the decision was made or action taken with good intent, in following his or her sense of duty and the moral laws. There is an obvious question that sticks out in this reasoning: what are the moral laws, and where do they come from. According to Immanuel Kant, the man who started…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Maxim Analysis

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As explained in lecture the first formulation of the categorical imperative is, “Act only in accordance with that maxim that you can at the same time will that it become a universal law.” First off, what does it mean to say, “Will as a universal law?” This means that you must ask yourself two questions. The first being whether you can consistently conceive of everyone acting on your maxim in all possible circumstances, and the second question being to ask yourself whether you can will everyone acting on your maxim in all possible circumstances. But if you don’t know the meaning of a maxim, then you can’t fully understand what these two questions are asking of you.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant created a handful of formulations regarding his system of determining morality, the Categorical Imperative. James and Stuart Rachels in The Elements of Moral Philosophy, illuminate Kant's first and second Categorical Imperatives. While Kant claims the formulations are equivalent, they offer differing guidelines on how the Categorical Imperative is operated. Although the formulations share the same basis, the difference regarding how the formulations are adhered, is a large distinction difficult to ignore, and renders the two versions as separate subjects.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays