Preview

Active And Passive Euthanasia Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
192 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Active And Passive Euthanasia Summary
In the reading, "Active and Passive Euthanasia," the author argues that there is no distinction between active euthanasia and passive euthanasia, and that even letting a person die through passive euthanasia can be just as cruel as intentionally killing someone (pp. 564-565).
One of the author’s main reasons to support his view is that the suffering that people experience when a physician withholds treatment can be just as painful, or even more painful, than actively killing someone (pp.565). The author also explains that, in terms of motives, killing is not necessarily worse than letting die (pp.565-566). Although both can be done with good intentions, like to relieve someone of their pain, both have the motive of terminating life. He also


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe euthanasia can be the most humane option for those suffering enough if the patient chooses it. I would say I am for active euthanasia. Passive euthanasia in some circumstances seems less humane than active because with passive the person is left to die slowly from lack of treatment or sustenance whereas active would put an instant relatively painless end to the pain. Active euthanasia should be administered only in special circumstances where the suffering is great and the patient has little time left to live. It needs to be distinct from suicide.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Natural Law Theory states that an action is only considered “right” if it does not intentionally or directly violate any of the four basic intrinsic goods that thirteenth-century philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas described. According to Aquinas, the four basic intrinsic goods are: human life, human procreation, human knowledge and human sociability. So for example, according to natural law theory, using contraceptives such as condoms or birth control pills would not be morally permissible because it directly and intentionally violates the second intrinsic good: human procreation. Not all situations, however, are as straightforward as right or wrong. In some situations, it is impossible to take an action without violating…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rachels and Brock James Rachels’ thoughts on active and passive euthanasia come down to the idea that there is no moral difference between both active and passive euthanasia. That simply they are functionally equivalent. Rachels’ argument stems from the AMA’s stance on euthanasia. The AMA believes the intentional termination of one’s life is contrary to “that for which the medical profession stands.”…

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 6 is about dealing with ethical questions regarding active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. The chapter begins with many examples in which suicide is clear and others where it can be puzzling. One example was about a truck driver that knew he was going to die anyway, so he stirs his runaway truck into a concrete abutment to avoid hitting a school bus that stopped on the roadway to discharge children. In my opinion, this is not a suicide case. The truck driver didn’t intend on getting killed nor did he want to die. Although he did stir his truck into a concrete abutment, it was only to avoid potentially killing the kids on the bus. The bus driver didn’t have the power to avoid his death, so he chose to safe the life’s of others. Another case was about how a…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PHI208 QUIZ WK1

    • 1304 Words
    • 16 Pages

    These are the automatically computed results of your exam. Grades for essay questions, and comments from your instructor, are in the "Details" section below.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many different organizations like the World Health Organization or WHO, are concerned that the nature of the physician - patient relationship will be irrevocably altered for the worse if physicians are given a license to “kill”. (Young). However, advocates for physician assisted suicide like Margaret Battin will argue that physicians whom alone society has entrusted custody of the means of ensuring a good death, have a positive duty to help terminally ill patients in intractable pain who wish to die, which is a duty grounded in the bioethical principles of beneficence and non-malfeasance (Young).…

    • 2509 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    But then again, he is just trying to challenge the distinction and he is successful at it. It makes me think why should anyone suffer a slow painful death? In the end both cause the death of someone. Active euthanasia would be much more “compassionate.” In my opinion, we see euthanasia as a brutal killing because we are more exposed to the terrible things shown by the media, but we are not as familiar with the characteristics of letting someone die. Thus, we always think killing is worst. I believe that active euthanasia should be a choice and it is not wrong. A terminally ill patient should be able to decide his fate to end his life or continue suffering. Of course, when the patient is not able to make decisions it should be the guardian’s right to do it. It is not easy to make such decision, but the option should be…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Any action or social policy is morally right if it serves to increase the amount of happiness in the word or to decrease the amount of misery. Conversely, an action or social policy is morally wrong if it serves to decrease happiness or to increase misery.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 247) The utilitarian argument is used to justify and condemn many policies, however, I believe that the argument is especially fitting when it comes to the matter of active euthanasia. Mercy, an action that serves to decrease the overall misery in the world, is an unquestionable sign of kindness and correctness. Mercy comes in many forms and is rarely frowned upon. Following this reasoning, why is mercy that takes the form of ending a suffering patient’s life considered…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Debate Resolution: If voluntary euthanasia is legalized in the U.S., it will have primarily positive and acceptable social consequences. Consequently, it should be legal…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Daniel Brock rationalizes his claim that voluntary active euthanasia is morally permissible with the use of two moral values. According to Brock, the moral values of self-determination and well-being support voluntary active euthanasia. As defined and detailed thoroughly in Brock’s argument on page 11 of his paper “Voluntary Active Euthanasia”, self-determination is equal to the ability to decide what decisions in and about your life will coincide with your concept of a good life, and well-being is equal to being content with your life. The formal argument that Brock formulates is reliant on these two moral values. The argument is as follows: “1. The values of patient self-determination and well-being support VAE, 2. So there is a good moral…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With passive euthanasia, the patient will be in “terrible agony” until the patient’s body finally gives up. For this purpose, physician-assisted suicide should be legal since it is a moral alternative. The physician is doing their job because they are respecting the patient’s wish if they choose not to prolong their pain any longer. With the legalization of physician-assisted suicide, the physician will be able to administer a prescription of the lethal drug dosage that the patient will take on their own to end their life. Physician-assisted suicide is a better alternative to passive since the patient will die “relatively quick[ly] and painless[ly],” (Rachels, 1975, 79) rather than in “terrible agony” (Rachels 1975,…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the most controversial things in the world of medicine, Physician-Assisted Death and Euthanasia. For starters what do these two terms mean, why and how are they so different? Physician-Assisted Death a.k.a. Doctor-Assisted Suicide is the voluntary termination of one's life who is terminally ill by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician. Doctor assisted suicide is currently legal in the following five states, California, Vermont, Montana, Oregon, and Washington. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. Any form or practice of Euthanasia is prohibited in all fifty states and is legal in select few countries…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending someone’s life so that any type of suffering and pain will come to an end. It was first seen throughout 5th century B.C. and 1st century B.C. by the ancient Greeks and Romans. Prior to Christianity coming forth, ancient Greece and Rome had a tolerance for assisted-suicide. Few physicians followed the Hippocratic Oath which “prohibited doctors from giving ‘a deadly drug to anybody, not even if asked for,’ or from suggesting such a course of action” (Dowbiggin). During this time there was much support for euthanasia rather than prolonged suffering. This led many physicians to comply with a patient’s request and administer the poisons. Later on between the 12th and 15th century, with the rise…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Voluntary Active Euthanasia is a controversial subject, Does one have the right to end their own life? According to Peter Singer in “Voluntary Euthanasia: A utilitarian Perspective,” Voluntary Active Euthanasia is morally permissible under certain circumstances. If and only if certain requirements are met by certain parties can the process of voluntary active euthanasia be completed.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Research Paper on Euthanasia

    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages

    One of the most hotly debated ethical issue of our time is one of Euthanasia. Euthanasia comes from the Greek words “Eu”, meaning well or easy, and “Thanatos”, meaning death. In modern terms it is the intentional premature termination of another’s life by direct intervention or by withholding care.[1] Within that it can be either voluntary (expressed or implied consent), or involuntary. The two sides of this debate are the rights of an individual to decide when he or she is to die, or the sanctity of life and the states responsibility to protect people.…

    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays