Preview

Actus Reus/Mens Rea

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
797 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Actus Reus/Mens Rea
Angus can be charged with constructive murder of Chris under section 3A (1) of the Crimes Act 1958 , but the prosecution must prove all the elements of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt.
ACTUS REUS
The actus reus requirement for murder is that Angus caused the death of a human being and that his actions were voluntary. Chris, a human being, was an innocent customer who entered the service station and was struck by a bullet from the gun which Angus was holding; he dies as a result of this strike. Voluntariness of the action needs to be established. Angus had a loaded gun pointed at the cashier; demanding money and cigarettes, there's no question that these were all conscious and voluntary acts. Chris was struck by the bullet which was discharged from the gun as it hit the floor after falling out of Angus's hand as he slips on the floor. In applying the law to the given facts, Angus did not actually pull the trigger of the gun but all his actions prior to slipping on the floor were voluntary and the death occurred in the course of his voluntary actions; regardless of his awareness or unawareness of what might occur in the course of his actions.
Causation
Factual Causation
The prosecution must show that the it was the act of the accused was the cause of death. If it wasn't "but for" Angus having a loaded gun, Chris would not have died.
Legal Causation
The prosecution must show that the accused conduct was the substantive and operating cause of death and that any intervening act did not break the chain of causation.
In R v Hallet, the accused rendered the victim unconscious and left him at the water's edge; victim died of drowning when the tide had risen; it was held that the normal operation of the tide did not break the chain of causation; found guilty. In applying this reasoning used to the facts presented, Angus was in the service station with a loaded gun pointed at the cashier, the fact that he failed to read the warning sign of the wet

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What reasons does the prosecution give to support their conclusion? The prosecutors support of reasons where that Judi Arias was stocking Travis. Arias stole her grandparent’s gun to murder Travis. Also the day of the murder she rented a car and was using cans of gas so it seemed that she was never in Arizona. These evidence concludes for the prosecutors that Judi arias planed the murder of Travis Alexander.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two days following Davis’s conviction on charges of the murder of Officer Mark MacPhail, jury recommended the death penalty and Davis was sentenced to death. Officer MacPhail’s family wasn’t allowed to testify but Davis comment with; “Spare my life, just give me a second chance. That’s all I ask. I was convicted for offenses that I didn’t commit.” If the victim was still alive to testify, he could have confirmed Davis’s statement or better yet identify the true shooter in the case rather it really was Troy Davis or not.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this case study I will examine the forensic evidence (limited to the main ballistic evidence), that was presented in the criminal trials and the forensic evidence that was introduced by the prosecution.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Schmalleger, F., Hall, D. E., & Dolatowski, J. J. (2010). Criminal Law Today: An introduction with…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case involves the suspects attempting to murder the victims by shooting at them from a loaded firearm during a drive-by shooting. One victim sustained a non-life threatening gunshot wound.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Provocation was previously controlled under S2 of the homicide act 1957, the act stated where a person kills or is party to a killing of another, he shall not be convicted of murder if he was suffering from such abnormality of mind as substantially impaired his mental responsibility for his acts and omissions in doing or being a party to the killing. The new defence S54-56 Coroners and Justice Act 2009 replaced defence of Provocation S3 Homicide Act 1957; it came into force October 2010.…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack, Bert and Pratt

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case, the court dismissed the charge of the attempt of murder of Bert because Jack could not have killed Bert due to the malfunction of his gun. The court was not right by dismissing the attempt murder charge because he had the intent to kill Bert and he even fired his weapon towards him but ended up killing Pratt. All the tree elements of an attempt were present plus it also meets the mens rea of attempt. It meets the mens rea because Jack intentionally performed an act that was proximate to the completion of a crime, and by possessing the intent or purpose to achieve a criminal objective. In addition meets the actus reus of attempt because he came extremely close to the commission of the crime. In addition he killed Pratt while pointing the gun at Bert with the intent to kill him.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On May 6, 2016 a police officer found himself facing a young African American holding a pistol. Police officer, Stephan Mader, was let go from his position weeks later for not shooting the African American with the pistol. Stephan Mader is suing the city because he does not think it is fair that he was let go for not shooting a person. The reason Stephan Mader did not shot the African American was because it seem that the guy, Mr. Williams, wanted to commit suicide by a police officer. Mr. William told Stephan to shot him. Stephan was trying to come down Mr. William until two other police officer saw Mr. William waving the gun and shot him dead. Then they notice that the weapon that Mr. William had was not loaded. A country prosecutor had…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adrian Crump Trial Case

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Manslaughter is a crime that is unjustified, inexcusable, and the intentional killing of a human being, whether it be involuntary or voluntary. This is the criminal charge that Adrian Crump from Jacksonville, Florida had to face. He shot a 15-year-old boy, around 2 in the morning, who was driving around shooting rocks from a slingshot. Adrian heard a noise in his home and thought it was a gunshot. He got up and checked it out, then went back inside and grabbed his gun as well as getting dressed. He then got in his car and pulled up behind the offender’s car, and shot the boy because he put his hands down, and he said he thought the kid was reaching for a gun. During the trial the prosecutor and defense team brought up the two sides of the story. We were asked how we felt about the trial and how we would find him. I took into consideration Adrian’s motivation or intention, self-defense, the witness’ statements, and crimes going on around the city.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sentencing Proposal FINAL

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    My team and I believe there was a crime committed and at some point the defendant was in the victims home and stole some of her property. There was a fight or struggle of some sort because the victim has the defendants skin under her fingernails. Drugs were found in both party’s apartments, blood stained the carpet and rope was discovered in the victims’ apartment, which was used to tie the victim up at some point. In the defendants home a journal was discovered with strange journal entries talking about God’s work and purchasing rope, rags and a hunting knife to fulfill his destiny. 300 photos were hung all over the wall and the defendant was talking about being God and about aliens. If you want to charge the defendant with murder you need physical proof my client murdered the victim. Yes, we realize the evidence may point to the defendant committing the crime and maybe he did kill Miss Opee but at this time we do not know for certain. Even though we have all this evidence against Mr. Dents, the only real solid evidence you have is the skin under the fingernails. We do not know if that came from a struggle, a fight, she could have slapped him for some reason or it could have even been from a consensual sexual encounter between the two of them. You did not find a murder weapon, so it will be a tough case to prove he murdered her. In our opinion I believe he should have a psych evaluation administered to even determine if he is able to stand trial based on his mental status. Pending the results the defendant should either be released on bail until the trial or if he is found to be not in a state of mind to stand trial, he should be sent to a hospital to get the mental help he needs. Once he is released from the mental hospital, and there is evidence that his health has improved and he is able to stand trial, at that moment we can put him in front of a jury of his peers,…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good evening Your Honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, and opposing counsel. Tonight you heard the testimony and evidence in Roughed Grouse High School's attempt to hide, justify, and deny their negligent actions. In order to prove Roughed Grouse High School's negligence resulting in the death of Jordan Simon, I, along with my co-counsel, had to prove our case, not beyond a reasonable doubt, but simply by a preponderance of evidence. In other words, if you were to put the evidence favoring the case of the plaintiff and evidence favorable to the defendant on a scale, we the plaintiff would have to make the scales tip ever so slightly in our favor. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we have done just that. We have proved to you tonight by a preponderance of evidence, not that the defendant was solely responsible for the unfortunate and untimely death of Jordan Simon, but that those representing Roughed Grouse High School were more negligent above all others involved.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Murder is the most serious form of unlawful homicide. Murder is a common law offence, and has never been defined by statute. The most commonly accepted definition is the one given by the early 17th century judge, Sir Edward Coke. He defined murder as: ‘The unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being under the Queens peace with malice aforethought, express or implied.’’ The actus reus of murder is the ‘unlawful killing.’ Some killings are recognised by the law as being justified. For example a person who kills in self-defence or in the prevention of a crime, provided that the force used was reasonable in the circumstances, will not be guilty of an unlawful killing. However a criticism of this is that the ‘reasonable’ force used in self-defence or in the prevention of a crime is subjective to each individual and it depends on how scared each person would be in that circumstance for example a woman who is quite confident and fearless could be attacked on the street by a man and she just pushes him away and runs however a woman who is extremely terrified in the situation could react more irrationally and hit him with a weapon such as an iron bar to get him away from her because she is so terrified, therefore it is hard to dictate to some-one what reasonable force is as reasonable force to me could be completely unreasonable force to another. A reform I would suggest for this would be to clearly set out guidelines within this as what would be considered unreasonable force so that it is not as subjective to each individual. The next part of the actus reus of murder is ‘a reasonable person in being’. A reasonable person in being is considered to be any person in being, a baby is only considered to be such when it has been fully expelled from its mothers body. A criticism I think of this is that this should be allowed. I think after abortion is made…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The kid would have to be guilty, there was enough proof to prove he was guilty. The kid should be guilty because there was so much proof that he was guilty that its ridiculous. If the kid wasn’t guilty he could have had so much evidence to prove he wasn’t including the pockets that had the hole in them or the movie ticket he had when he watched the movie at the theaters. He didn’t have the movie ticket so he couldn’t prove he was at the movies at the time of the killing. He didn’t have the pants or whatever he was wearing that had the holes in the pocket to prove he lost his switch blade in there.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charge Negotiation

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case of Edward Lee is significant because it shows that the process of Charge Negotiation can be abused to punish someone for a crime, even if they had not committed it. It was the 2nd time in NSW where a judge has refused to accept a manslaughter plea. Justice Hulme’s decision was applauded and attorney-general Chris Hartcher said it was “wonderful to see the court taking a firm stand”.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) Bill will be charged with murder. As Bill has committed the act of causing Tony’s death, the actus reus of the cirme will be established. The mental element of the offence is also straightforward as Bill very obviously had the intention of killing Tony.…

    • 3193 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics