Preview

Adams Vs Jefferson Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
406 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Adams Vs Jefferson Analysis
In the excerpt that we read from Adams Vs. Jefferson: The Tumultuous Election of 1800, John Fleshing paints a picture in the readers head to help them understand what was going on between Adams, a federalist, and Jefferson, a democratic-republican. Even though I had to listen and read the excerpt several times to understand what was happening, there are a few things that I never knew about that I learned. For instance, I didn’t know that George Washington was a federalist, so that helped me understand certain decisions that he made. It also helped me understand how manipulative Alexander Hamilton was. Fleshing named this “Hamilton’s finest moment of artful political orchestration.” (pg.63) From what I’ve learned, he has played such a well game in politics. Like always, the Federalist party and the Democratic-Republican party had tension over how the government …show more content…
In the previous election, there obviously was some sort of bickering. We can see that Trump called Hillary Clinton “Crooked Hillary” and she called his supporters “deplorable”. From the reading, the insults seemed less harsher and more classier than the ones we have today. The word ‘odious’ seems to be thrown around a lot. But it’s basically the same, each party questioning the ideals of the other party by petty insults. I guess this kind of behavior is an example of one of the five principles, that all political behavior has a purpose. Mudslinging and political jockeying are done to win the campaign by emphasizing their opponents negative aspects. Another example of this principle from the reading, is the imposed tax. Thanks to the advisement from Alexander Hamilton, Congress passed the Whiskey Tax. The reason for the whiskey tax was to offset the new national debt. Offsetting the new national debt would bring more power and financial aid to the central government, which exactly is what the federalist

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    How did Jefferson’s ideals of government differ from those of Hamilton? Jefferson believed in strong states which would in return better control the government while also benefiting us while Hamilton believed in strong central government where the states would have limited power and the elite would have a say in government while also basing the economy on industry and large national debt.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson were chosen Apart from it being his priority to keep positive relationships with other countries, Jefferson kept good communication with France after Genet’s misfortune. Even after “the Terror” in France, Jefferson stood by the beliefs and actions of France. Hamilton was a Federalist that in the now would be referred to Republicans. The ideas were similar to those of Europe, allowing for Federal Government to have more control and a monarchy control.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamiltonian, Lieutenant- colonel, First U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and Secretary of State and spent his time devoted to the rich and wealthy individuals of Virginia. Though I have little knowledge on today’s congress, senate, and military. What I do remember is that what we have in common with Hamilton is,” Strong central government, order and organization, Industrial development, Helped establish a financial credit for the U.S. government. Hamilton had a firm belief that the rich, powerful and well educated should have the control on the government. Which in all honesty looking at today modern times, I can fully agree that the much upper class controlling the government, why? To be blunt money talks in future and I’m sure during 1780s and 90s it did as well, the rich and well educated people would rather spend his or her tax money on what they believe is right each upper class individual have a grasp on politics. Hamilton’s strong belief is still going strong today and being applied through the Senate Congress…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which made their rivalry even more intense. Hamilton was an intense Federalist in favor of a very powerful federal government. Madison was a Democratic-Republican, so he was in favor of states rights. Burr was a little different, he mostly cared about how to gain power and once joined the other party to improve his chances of becoming president he stayed with Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans for most of his political career. The first rift between Hamilton and Jefferson started when they were selected to serve as cabinet members, Hamilton as Treasury secretary and Jefferson as Secretary of State. Since they had such wildly different viewpoints they often fought. Hamilton, a very egotistical person, sometimes even called a narcissist, attacked Jefferson’s character to demean him during cabinet meetings. Burr and Hamilton were both very well known public figures who were even friends until Burr ran for a Senate seat and beat out Hamilton's father in law. In the article Mr. Kennedy explains how he believes this wasn't a direct act of aggression to Hamilton, as some historians believe, showing just one claim of bias in this analysis. Burr and Jefferson's conflict started in the election of 1800. To make it brief, The voting process was different back then. Jefferson and Burr tied for the most votes and instead of stepping aside for Jefferson, Burr made an attempt at the Presidency. And in order to break the tie, Hamilton endorsed Jefferson, which made electors swing their vote to Jefferson, breaking the tie. This was just one reason Burr challenged Hamilton to duel. Hamilton saw Jefferson as the lesser of two evils, even going as far as saying Burr was a “mischievous enemy.” The 18th century equivalent of calling someone a liar and a fraud on television today. These three men disliked each other a great deal and showed it to the press, and to one…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the number one fan of the musical “Hamilton”, I was immediately drawn to Washington & Hamilton: The Alliance That Forged America by Stephen F Knott and Tony Williams. I have always been interested in the relationship between George Washington and Alexander Hamilton, but have heard little about it prior to this book. I was really pulled into this book when I read the second paragraph of the introduction, “But one of the more important founding collaborations has been overlooked by readers: the unlikely partnership of George Washington and Alexander Hamilton” (pg XI). This sentence leads to the main point, which examines the odd yet critical alliance between Washington and Hamilton.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson”, the rhetorical appeals come within the characters. Both John Adams and Thomas Jefferson used ethos in their favor during the campaign. They were both exceedingly credible, which was their main goal. Consequently, closely related came how they used pathos. Since they were remarkably credible they easily impacted the audience emotions. They did this by saying things that were not true about each other. Instead of targeting each other on political ground they took shots at each other on a personal level. To conclude, the result of this was in other words a perfect use of pathos by both candidates; they made the audience feel they should choose the other one simply because of the fallacies told by one…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the 1800's, Jeffersonian Republicans thought that the federal government’s power was confined to the grants of the Constitution. On the other hand, the Federalists believed in the broad construction that gave the government any power that was not forbidden by the constitution. Despite the fact that the Jeffersonian Republicans believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and Federalists believe in a loose interpretation, these beliefs were misrepresented according to the party’s views on the authority of the government during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. During this time, the Jeffersonian Republicans beliefs were inverted with the beliefs of the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans leaned toward a loose interpretation and the Federalists leaned toward a strict one.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the rise and fall of the articles of confederation, the United States first attempt for a strong government, the new constitution declares that an chief executive shall be elected to be the leader of our nation. This chief executive will be elected in an official election and will be known as the POTUS or President of the United States. Since the birth of the Constitution many presidents have been elected and ran for one or more terms. Whether they would actually run for more terms is based on their popularity as a president. As each president comes and goes, different choices and actions, or different characteristics define how well of a leader they were. Two presidents who showed both negative and positive characteristics as well as…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Congress, July 4, 1776, Thomas Jefferson wrote to King George III for the American colonists to proclaim freedom. Jefferson wanted independence because he believed that it would be a better option for America to have a society that is treated equally and fairly. Through the use of persuasive elements, he successfully presented his evidence and reasoning as to why he believed America should part their ways from Great Britain and King George III to create the society America deserved.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflict that took place in the 1790’s between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists made a huge impact on American History. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and focused mainly on the city businesses as well as manufacturing interests of the seaports. On the other side, the Anti-Federalists whom were led by Thomas Jefferson represented the rural farmers and southern interests. With the Federalists favoring more federal involvement and the anti-federalists advocating states rights, this debate between the two concerned the central government versus that of the states.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over two hundred years ago people were asking how powerful should the president be? Is he too powerful now? Today, in the twenty-first century, political scientist, constituent, and even politicians are asking the same questions. One of the most notable debates over this subject stems from a disagree between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton preferred a larger executive while Jefferson preferred a smaller one. When George Washington declared neutrality during a war between Britain and France, Jefferson did not believe that Washington had the constitutional power to do this. Hamilton decided to respond; he did so by publishing articles under the pseudonym, Pacificus.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Jefferson and Jackson administrations were both very similar and different. They were both american presidents who had very specific ways of looking at the world. They helped America become what it is today albeit how bad it is. (it was better in their days)…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    History DBQ

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton fought bitterly over issues of constitutional interpretation in the 1790s, the policies of the Jeffersonian Republican Presidents Jefferson and Madison in the years 1801-1817 often reflected the beliefs of the Federalist Hamilton. To what extent is this an accurate statement?…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first dilemma conveys about how President John Adams solves the problem of how to protect American ships from French and British attacks. The attacks first started when France found out that America was making the Jay treaty with Britain. France though of this as America breaking their alliance and trying to make peace with France’s enemy. Since America was a new country and pretty weak it was easy for Britain and France to take advantage of them and impress their sailors. This is similar to how the new kid at school is usually picked on and taken advantage of since they probably moved here from somewhere else and are kind of like an outsider.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even president Jefferson at one point took advantage of the widening gap between Federalist groups and the obvious disagreements that led to less and less decision making.1 The Federalists lost power because of their infighting. Such infighting allowed their enemies to exploit weaknesses in the party and gain power over the Federalists, slowly inching them to their demise. Madison’s retirement proved to be another crushing blow to the Federalists, as it allowed their enemies, the Anti-Federalists, to have a leader that would have no antithesis with the Federalists.2 Madison supported Federalist ideas because while he was not a pledged Federalist, he had been in his earlier days. His position of power would have allowed for the Federalists to pass a few laws, but that opportunity was short lived and was not taken advantage of, therefore delivering a blow to their power. Loss of power once again proved detrimental to the Federalist when they squandered a majority in Congress. If not for the headstrongness of the members, the Federalists would have remained in power when they had a majority and could have done much to keep themselves in power or to benefit themselves.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays