Preview

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Senate In Canada

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1186 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Senate In Canada
The Senate Debate

Stephany Shenouda
130604690
PO110- Tutorial 5
Word Count: 1159 July 1st 1867 marks the date that Canada confederated into a nation dedicated to promote democracy. Canada would be governed by a Parliamentary system consisting of an upper and lower chamber of legislation. The House of Commons, being the lower chamber is made up of elected representatives from across the country, democratically voting upon bills. The upper chamber, the Senate is made up of 105 individuals specifically appointed by the Governor General to represent certain geographical areas across the country. The Senate is primarily responsible for providing a “sober second thought”
…show more content…
Nonetheless, minor reforms are indeed needed. To begin the Senates books may be opened to allow the public to access of the Auditor General. In doing so, the public will be assured that their tax money is being spent efficiently and properly. In addition to allowing spending to become transparent, the appointment process may also be opened up more to the public so they are not surprised by their representative and understand the Governor Generals …show more content…
However, the need for the Senate is still prominent, as they are needed to ensure the soundness of bills being passed. It is for this reason that minor and modest changes should be made over time to regulate its transparency and openness to the public when it comes to spending and appointing Senators. Although these changes are minor, it will allow for the Senate to remain the same role in the Canadian system as it has, while satisfying the public with insight regarding their decisions.

Work Cited

"Abolish The Senate: A Sober Second Look at Canadian Democracy." Abolish The Senate RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Mar. 2014. .
"Housekeeping." Senate Reform or Abolish. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Mar. 2014. .
MacKinnon, Leslie. "Preston Manning: Renovate the Senate or tear it down." CBCnews. CBC/Radio Canada, 22 Jan. 2014. Web. 11 Mar. 2014. .
"Preston Manning wants Canadians to vote on Senate 's future." Toronto Sun. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Mar. 2014. .
"Should Canada Elect, Abolish or Reform the Senate? | Omar Alghabra." The Huffington Post. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Mar. 2014. .
"Tory Senate overturns opposition bill for first time on climate change Add to ...." The Globe and Mail. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Mar. 2014.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis Dsay Research Paper

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    . Let us see what happens. Our country is a complete mess at this moment let us…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Senate may have been critical and a good idea when Canada was first developing however, today the Senate has no real purpose. The leaders need reminder that the Constitution does not belong to the fender and provincial governments but to the people of Canada. The Senate does not represent all provinces equally, with BC, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba having 6 seats each, compared to Ontario and Quebec who have 24 seats each.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [67] Don Martin. "Lord knows, Canada 's Senate needs reforming. " CanWest News 10 March 2007 1. CBCA Current Events. ProQuest. 22 Oct. 2007…

    • 3508 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This system “is known for the separation of powers and for congressional committee system” (Dickerson & Flanagan, 1982). In relation to Prime Minister Harper’s plan for re-election, the election would be significantly different in a Presidential system. To start, the passing of the Fair Elections Act most likely would not have occurred due to the loose party discipline as well as the separation of powers leading to the opportunity of vetoing the bill – Explained further, “the president’s powers are restricted by not being a member of Congress… limited to exercising influence rather than authority over its members” (Dickerson & Flanagan, 1982). As a result, Harper would not have acquired an increased campaign budget or an extended campaign time which would have negatively affected his party’s chances of winning. If met with an issue that the majority of people disagreed on, great opposition of the President could cause a “full-blown regime crisis” (Linz, p. 65, 1990).…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As one of Canada’s most prominent historians, Jack Granatstein regularly comments on historical questions and public affairs in the media, including issues such as foreign and defense policies, Canadian-American relations, the military and public service. In his book Who Killed Canadian History?, Granatstein continues his tradition of scholarly discussion on the progressively increasing deterioration of Canadian history. It is because of this dire state, as Granatstein argues, that Canadians have such a fragmented view of themselves, and subsequently national unity remains obscure.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Trudeau’s essay to Francois Rocher’s The Quebec-Canada Dynamic or the Negation of the Ideal of Federalism, there are both similarities and differences in their construction. Rocher, states that the interpretation of the direction of the Canadian federalism greatly depends on the origin of scholar who writes it (312). Quebec scholars, argue that the system has forgotten its designed purpose and in turn aims to centralize power within federal authority (Rocher 312). While English speaking Canadians focused on: the links between federalism and democracy in respect to reducing tyrannical behaviour, the degree to which governments have created public policies to address citizen issues (Rocher 312). Additionally, Rocher, uses specific documents…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fathers of Confederation conceived of the Senate as a “chamber of sober second thought.” However, almost ever since its creation, as the unelected arm of the legislature, people have suggested ways in which to reform the upper house. Concerns of illegitimate representation, party loyalty, and patronage are the main reasons the argument for change continues. This paper aims to review a couple of recent reform proposals, and then argue, leaving constitutional practicality behind, that the Senate should receive a major overhaul in how it is formed and represented.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Senators of both parties frequently use whatever leverage they have to extract policy concessions from the executive branch. The number coming from this Grand Old Party is notable, especially as Senator Representatives have raised the possibility…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Often more times than not, people cringe at the thought of politics, but there are the few whom desire the power to enforce change. Politicians rarely receive adoration from the general public, and they shoulder the country’s burdens, but none have been adored (hence the term Trudeau-mania) and have progressed like Pierre Trudeau. Trudeau grew up speaking French to his father and English to his mother and this combination is what defined him; Trudeau was not French or English, he was a true Canadian. Pierre Trudeau was not like most politicians, other politicians compromised and soothed; while Pierre Trudeau came into politics with his guns blazing while saying, “Just watch me”. The consequence of these actions led Pierre Trudeau to have a strong supportive following, and an equally strong army of critics. He was a controversial man, but not one Canadian can argue that Trudeau did not bring Canada to where it is today. Prime Minister Trudeau, almost singlehandedly, molded Canada into the image that he desired; a country that was bilingual, rational, and a just society that was founded upon the ideals of freedom and individual autonomy.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Canadian Senate Essay

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Canadian Senate has often been referred to as the sober second thought. The house of commons was originally set up to have two chambers, the upper and the lower, to carefully decide Canadian laws. The Senate, in the upper house, reviews proposed legislation and ultimately decides whether a bill becomes a law. They are responsible for protecting the interests of Canadians, in all regions, and of all minorities.1 Recently however, there has been a big concern for more accountability. Many…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    This can be seen as a disadvantage for the liberal government as it is necessary for the government to stick to their word and give the people the promise they were given before coming into power. The amendment of the bill must take place along with modifications being made to the cabinet or construction of a policy or law. This will be a step forward for the government and its people. So how does a bill get drafted and who all has the powers during the process? Keeping in mind that the lawmakers in Canada are the cabinet ministers, the Prime Minister is considered to be the chief lawmaker. Similarly the final verdict on the creation of policies and bills before the legislature votes will also be conducted by the Prime Minister. Since the Prime Minister is the chief maker, the cabinet ministers are appointed by him. Bureaucrats in Canada are given an influential power in drafting bill proposals for their respective…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canada Interest Groups

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Another factor making the political party inferior is its longstanding values, territorial basis restricting it from expansion since political parties aim to accomplish control of legislative. Hence since the legislature is based on a territorial perimeter, the rest of the political party body must follow in this direction. In contrast to some interest groups, political parties have not fully been able to achieve a system which incorporates the public into the policy making process. Pross questioned whether the fragmentation of the political parties endangers long-standing institutions, or if this merely is the politics of the new age. Canada has witnessed the emergence of a new public philosophy “pluralism” started taking the place of the previous representative parliamentary democracy. Pluralism emphasizes the collaboration between government and interest groups. Ideally members of private groups exchange ideas and negotiate with government civil…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In theory, the Parliament is the most important institution in the Canadian government and all members of the parliament are equal. The Prime Minister is supposed to be primus inter pares, meaning first among equals. But over the years, the cabinet has become more institutionalized and less departmentalized. Hence the Prime Minister’s power has increased over the years. Canada is the one of the most decentralized federations in the World. Power is swung away from the parliament and is more concentrated in the executive branch (Courtney, 1984: p. 241). The Prime Ministers is not too powerful in a global scale but it has substantial power within Canada. However the power of the Prime Minister can also be affected by many different factors. .…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canadian Politics

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    6.) Why does the Canadian Senate consist only of members of the Liberal/ Conservative party?…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dull Government

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    PARLIAMENT is a great thing, but it is not a cheerful thing. Just reflect on the existence of 'Mr Speaker.' First, a small man speaks to him—then a shrill man speaks to him—then a man who cannot speak will speak to him. He leads a life of 'passing tolls,' joint-stock companies, and members out of order. Life is short, but the forms of the House are long. MrEwart complains that a multitude of members, including the Prime Minister himself, actually go to sleep. The very morning paper feels the weight of this leaden regime. Even in the dullest society you hear complaints of the dullness of Parliament—of the representative tedium of the nation.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays