Preview

Is the Prime Minister Too Powerful?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2075 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is the Prime Minister Too Powerful?
Topic: Is the Prime Minister Too Powerful?

In this essay, I will demonstrate that the Prime Minister is powerful and can cause many potential dangers by analyzing different elements inside and outside of our government over the period of different Prime Ministers throughout the Canadian political history.
In theory, the Parliament is the most important institution in the Canadian government and all members of the parliament are equal. The Prime Minister is supposed to be primus inter pares, meaning first among equals. But over the years, the cabinet has become more institutionalized and less departmentalized. Hence the Prime Minister’s power has increased over the years. Canada is the one of the most decentralized federations in the World. Power is swung away from the parliament and is more concentrated in the executive branch (Courtney, 1984: p. 241). The Prime Ministers is not too powerful in a global scale but it has substantial power within Canada. However the power of the Prime Minister can also be affected by many different factors. .
Canada is a fusion of the British parliamentary system with the American federalism. The Prime Minister is the highest role in the government. He can appoint or remove individual from the cabinet and patriotic appointments. Lloyd Axworthy was hired as a cabinet minister by both Trudeau and Chrétien (Cook & Belanger, 2007: p. 401). The PM controls all justices of the Supreme Court of Justice, vacant seats in the senate, all heads of Canadian Crown Corporations and many more.
The Prime Minister’s powers extend beyond the level of federal government. The effects of the powerful Prime Minister do not necessarily exhibit from the PM itself by other actors in the government. Provincial premiers and territorial leaders are allowed to communicate directly to the PM without the going thought the web of ministers. Former premier of News Brunswick, Frank McKenna organized a one-on-one meeting with former PM Jean Chrétien during a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This system “is known for the separation of powers and for congressional committee system” (Dickerson & Flanagan, 1982). In relation to Prime Minister Harper’s plan for re-election, the election would be significantly different in a Presidential system. To start, the passing of the Fair Elections Act most likely would not have occurred due to the loose party discipline as well as the separation of powers leading to the opportunity of vetoing the bill – Explained further, “the president’s powers are restricted by not being a member of Congress… limited to exercising influence rather than authority over its members” (Dickerson & Flanagan, 1982). As a result, Harper would not have acquired an increased campaign budget or an extended campaign time which would have negatively affected his party’s chances of winning. If met with an issue that the majority of people disagreed on, great opposition of the President could cause a “full-blown regime crisis” (Linz, p. 65, 1990).…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Canada and Germany are countries that have different political ideologies also they have some parts of government bear similarities.Although they are two different country, there are have three clear difference between two government systems they use.First, Canada has a three parts of parliament,with House of Common, Senate and Government Governor. In contrast, Germany only have two parts of parliament,with a Bundestag and Bundersrat.Secondly, Canada is president have power, but in Germany is Chancellor.Finally, compare advantage and disadvantage of two government system, Germany’s goverment system is more…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly the PM proves that he has dominance through the power of patronage. The PM has the power to appoint ministers, Bishops and, in theory, can dissolve parliament and call elections. This means that, for the benefit of their parties’ ideology the PM can choose those who are loyal to him/her which makes them look stronger. The PM also has the power of royal Prerogative. There are PMs who have taken the power of patronage to their advantage like Gordon Brown who Fired 11 members of his old cabinet. Having the power of patronage mean he can change his cabinet to make it more to his liking. Also having the power of patronage means that the PM can give bonuses and promote back benches, making them less likely to rebel and support the choice that the pm makes. This shows that the pm dominates the system as they have the decision to have certain mps in their government, having loyal members makes him/her look stronger and more popular within his/hers own party. However there are limits and conditions to the power of patronage.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The role of Prime Minister has been constantly evolving over the years, and it can be argued that the degree of power he/she wields changes with it. For example, during the late 17th century, a Chief Minister existed as a special advisor to the monarch. However by the late 19th century, the Prime Minister is the leader of the largest party of House of Commons and enjoys greater political power, whereas the monarch acts as Head of State.…

    • 664 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    P. M Democratic Dictator

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1867 Canada’s government was established as a parliamentary democracy. It was declared that those in government are to follow the Bill of Rights and run Canada for the people. Recently, there has been much debate on whether or not the Prime Minister could be considered a “Democratic Dictator”. Democracy “is a foremost issue” and the people of Canada are arguing that one person may hold too much power. After exploring the possibilities, I do not believe the Prime Minister can be considered a Democratic Dictator, as he/she must be elected, have an opposition, and every law proposed is voted on in the House of Commons. However, in opposition to this statement, the P.M. holds…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Prime ministers are almost omnipotent in the political system in the UK, this is due to the shear variety of powers in-which the prime minister holds, and the prerogatives that are taken advantage by the prime minister. However, checks on powers in the UK means that the prime minister is not as power as they appear, moreover, they are not separable from the UK political system, henceforth, they are controlled and limited within the system they are part of, thus, more often than not, prime ministers are less powerful then sometimes claimed.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autonomy In Canada Essay

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In fact, Canada is a constitutional monarchy, and its executive authority is still vested in the monarch of Great Britain, currently Queen Elizabeth II. Every act of government is therefore carried out in the name of the crown. The monarch appoints a Canadian Governor General to oversee the executive…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Following the outbreak of World War One in 1914, Canada has had fifteen different Prime Ministers. Of those fifteen, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau has has had the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Prime Minister

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Canadian Prime Minister is the head of the Government and has significant powers in deciding how the nation is supposed to work in their stipulated time frame. While he/she is not the head of the state, he/she leads the Canadian Armed Forces and appoints the cabinet ministers, Supreme Court judges, senators, ambassadors, and heads of crown corporations. However, the Canadian constitution does not explicitly state most of the powers currently exercised by the Prime Minister because it does not establish the post of Prime Minister. These powers arise from unwritten Constitutional…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Canadian Parliament is divided into various branches, the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch, both of which are represented by the Queen who in turn is represented by the Governor General. The Executive branch represents the Prime Minister and his Cabinet, and The Legislative represents the House of Commons and the Senate. The Parliament of Canada has three branches, The Queen who appoints a Governor General to represent the Queen on her behalf, The House of Commons and then The Senate. The House of Common’s is the lower house of Parliament, and The Senate is the Upper half of the Canadian Parliament.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Governor General in Canada

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    My research paper will discuss the proposal of institutional reform concerning the function of Governor General. Canada is a constitutional monarchy and the role of the Governor General is to represent Canada as a whole in replace of the Crown or the Queen. Since Canada has no longer any real ties with the British Sovereignty in terms of government rules many would argue if the role of the Governor General has any significance to being an important political actor in Canada’s Constitution. To begin this paper, I will discuss a brief overview on what the role of a Governor General is, their formal powers and executive powers, dignified and efficient. My research paper will then emphasize on an institutional reform in regards to the function of the Governor General, it will discuss why Canada does not need a representation of the Crown any longer since the Governor General’s actions are mainly symbolic, therefore meaning that the new reform would have no Governor General appointed royally but instead an elected officer. The next argument in the development of the research will discuss the arguments against this institutional reform and why the Governor General’s role is still significant in Canada and why this political actor should still be a part of the Canadian Constitution, since in fact it is part of Canadian history and politics. And then lastly on the development is what my personal opinion is on the matter of having an institution reform or not and then finally finishing off with the conclusion of my paper.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canadian federalism forms the functions and roles of each level of government, in that constitutional power is split so that neither is superior to the other.[48] The Constitution Act, 1867, Section 109 ensures the province full ownership of the lands and resources within its borders. The province acts as the landowner and the federal government oversees jurisdiction over trade, commerce and taxation. There is a clear overlap, as resource management influences trade, and trade management influences resources.[49] As of the 1990s, both the federal and provincial government have been aligned, focusing on regulation, technology and the development of new export markets.[50] The majority of “ground-level” governance is carried out by a number of provincial…

    • 12946 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The provincial governments have legislative jurisdiction over, among other matters, real and personal property, civil rights, WHEN ESTABLISHING OR ACQUIRING education, health care and intra-provincial trade and commerce. Certain aspects of these A BUSINESS IN provincial powers are delegated to municipal CANADA, ONE MUST governments, which enact their own bylaws. BE CONCERNED WITH THE FEDERAL LAWS AS WELL AS Both levels of government are based on THE LAWS OF THE the British parliamentary system. At the PROVINCES WITHIN federal level, the Prime Minister is the head of government; at the provincial level, the Premiers. WHICH THE BUSINESS WILL BE CONDUCTED. These individuals are the leaders of the political parties that have either the greatest number of seats in the House of Commons or the provincial legislatures, respectively — or that have, at a minimum, the support of a majority of the members of the House of Commons or provincial legislatures, respectively. When establishing or acquiring a business in Canada, one must be concerned with the federal laws as well as the laws of the provinces within which the business will be conducted. In nine of the 10 provinces and in the three territories, the legal systems are based on common law. In Québec, the legal…

    • 4585 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Prime Minister

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    - We must first identify the role and responsibilities which entail the Prime Ministerial title. For the sake of this paper, the Prime Minister is the head of government, not the head of state. He formerly directs the activities of the day which in turn affect the every day lives of citizens across Canada. He is responsible to both the House of Commons and Senate which are responsible to the legialative branch of government.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crossing the floor

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The newley elected prime minister Stephen Harper had legitimate power in that he was elected to the post of prime minister. His party had genuine power in that they won the election. Harper is entrusted in a very powerful position. In his role as the prime minister one would assume that he naturally has Referent power as he would have to be somewhat charasmatic to win the postion. Expert power would also lend to his referent power. Harper then went on to assert his legitimate power in electing David Emerson. It seems as though Emerson was in pursuit of personalized power in that he was striving for self gratification and trying to increase his own personal gain in having a seat in government.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays