Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Adversarial vs. Inquisitorial Court Systems

Good Essays
381 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Adversarial vs. Inquisitorial Court Systems
Adversarial vs. Inquisitorial Court Systems

There are many differences as well as similarities between the adversarial and inquisitorial court systems. In an adversarial court, the judge tries to remain impartial. In an inquisitorial court the judge plays the role as a fact finder to ascertain the truth. The adversarial system is a contest between two opposing sides. In the adversarial system, the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The adversaries are the Prosecutor and the Defense. Each presents their best arguments and facts as about their theories of the case, and they show weaknesses in the other side’s case. The Judge is supposed to remain neutral, weigh the arguments and produce a judgment. Another word for this is "blind justice" which means not blind to the facts but blind to the wealth, color, religion etc. of the accused. In most circumstances, the Judge or Jury is bound to find the accused innocent unless he is convinced "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt" of the guilt of the accused. In the inquisitorial system, the accused is presumed guilty unless he can prove otherwise and the Judge questions the accused to try to get him to admit his guilt. In the inquisitorial system, the Judge takes the lead role in uncovering the truth. The Prosecutor and Defense take limited role in offering legal argument and interpretations. There is criticism of both systems. In the adversarial system, the goal of trial is “victory, no truth or justice” Justice is done when one side can convince the Judge or jury that his perspective on the case is the correct one. The party with the greater financial resources has the most advantage. Criticism of the Inquisitorial system argues that it places to much unchecked power in the hands of judges who investigate and determine the case, however it is more likely that an accurate verdict is most likely to arise from a careful and exhaustive investigation. The goal of both the adversarial system and the inquisitorial system is to find the truth. The adversarial system seeks the truth by putting the parties against each other in the hope that competition will reveal it, where as the inquisitorial system seeks the truth by questioning witnesses and people who are most familiar with the events of the case.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The definition of the criminal justice system is best described as a search for the truth, it is the system of law enforcement, the bar, the judiciary, corrections, and probation that is directly involved in the apprehension, prosecution, and defense, sentencing, incarceration, and supervision of those suspected of or charged with criminal offences. However know human is perfect and due to the justice system being handled by…

    • 5096 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This process is where witnesses are called to give their statements. They are questioned and cross examined by all lawyers/attorneys. Cross examination is being questioned by each lawyer/attorney they may ask the same questions but in different words. The prosecutor is there to make the jury believe the criminal is guilty whereas the defense attorney is there to make the jury question if the criminal is really guilty. There are also three types of witnesses which are; ordinary witnesses, expert witnesses, and character witnesses. “Ordinary witnesses can testify only as to their personal observations. Expert witnesses, on the other hand, are allowed to offer their opinions in their area of expertise. Chartacter witnesses may testify only to the general good reputation of the defendant” (Zalman,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although even with these similarities, the two trials are not perfectly identical and do have many variations between the two. One of these variations include the lawyers assigned in each case to represent the defendants.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law M1

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In criminal courts juries look upon the factors and decide if the verdict is guilty or not, whereas the judge looks on the law and decides the sentence. On the other hand, the judges in civil cases decide if the verdict is liable or not beyond reasonable doubt and if the verdict needs to pay injunctions.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of party control is an important feature of the adversary system. Because magistrates or judges have a very passive role in adversary trials, the case is totally left in the hands of the two parties. Both parties have almost complete control over the decisions about how the case will be run, such as ?tactics? they will use to win the case, as long as the rules of evidence and procedure are followed. This is a strength of the adversary system because it allows the parties to feel that they are in control of the situation and responsible for the outcome. It also satisfies the competitive, or combative spirit. Someone who can fight their own battle would feel more satisfied with the result of the case. Party control is very important in criminal cases in that the accused does not depend on the state for their defence. In civil cases the two parties are able to…

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are important people in the adversarial system used through the United States. The defense counsel referred to as the defense attorney, renders services on behalf of the indicted and exhibits legal defense for the client, and search for legal justification when appropriate. The other half of the defense counsel is the prosecutor. Prosecuting attorneys is an agent for the public, preferably not individualized people, and in extent is accountable for providing and introducing the state case facing defendants in criminal and civil court (Meyer & Grant, 2003). The function of the prosecutor basically rotates around ensuring that guilt does not go unpunished, the task of the defense attorney surrounds the need to ensure that the legally innocent are not found guilty and that the authority of the state has an adversarial counterpart to make sure some level of honesty is represented for individuals.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is no justice if there is no trial and there is no trial when the legal system is engaging in unethical…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court, Trials, and Sentencing: Due Process is a documentary explaining the court system within the criminal justice system. The American legal system is adversarial with two parties, the defense and the prosecution, working to prove to the jury their side is right. Overall the process of going through the court system is long and drawn out in order to make sure the person is guilty. From the initial charging to sentencing and appealing, there are a lot of steps the defendant needs to go through. This can be beneficial to the accused because it makes sure that they are guilty, but it also puts a burden on the community because of the time and money that needs to be spent on each individual case.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court system was formed to separate the innocent from the guilty when a disparity has surfaced or developed. In the criminal justice system everyone is entitled to a fair and unbiased trial. We will be identifying and describing the distinguishing features of the major court system ranging from state level, superior court and federal district court through the U.S. Supreme Court. Second we will discuss the key players, jurisdiction rules, and interpretation on issues and the effect of evolving technologies on the court proceeding at all levels in the court system.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monchalin (2016) describes the current justice system as adversarial, which in essence means they are combating crime. This idea shows the force and aggression used by the Westernized views of justice, where they feel that it is a “war on…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many say that the trial by jury is one of our sacred cows – meaning something that people don’t like to criticize- but many state that if we’d long had trial by judge in criminal cases and were to suggest that his reasoned and professional judgment as to facts and inferences should be replaced by the blanket verdict of pretty well any twelve men and women cramped together for a period of time the one would rightfully find this unjust. The role of the jury service is to encourage self-governance and civil participation, the ones who benefit from the jury service are ordinary citizens. What is important about the jury system is that it ensures the people ultimate control in the legislative and executive branch. Citizens can participate in the legislative and executive branches by exercising their right to vote, the only way that they can participate in the judicial branch of government is because the jury service has special role. The jury system allows ordinary citizens to participate in a government judicial process. They have the ultimate control in the legislative and executive branches.…

    • 588 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Systems

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are two essential elements of the U.S. Judicial System. The most basic part of the system is the adversarial system of justice. This is where the litigants present their cases before a neutral party. Litigants pay their own lawyer fees in addition a fee for filing a civil case in federal court. Many rules exist regarding how evidence and testimony are presented, trial procedure, courtroom behavior and etiquette and how evidence and testimony are presented. For federal courts, the rules are determined by committees composed of judges, professors and lawyers appointed by the chief Justice of the United States. The rules are approved by the…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three components of the system and they are all valuable in the criminal justice system. The primary component would be the police force. The police officers are given the responsibility to capture criminals, investigate, and testify in court about the actions that were witnessed. In some instances, police officers are given the obligation to jail the criminals directly from the street while they wait for their trial dates. The second component is the court system. The court system is usually composed of a prosecutor, judge, and a suspect who is generally referred to as the defendant while in the court. The prosecutor is known as the officer that is assigned by the government in order to prosecute all offenses brought to court. The prosecutor’s responsibility is to present the accusations that would justify that the defendant is guilty. On the down side, if the prosecutor cannot provide enough evidence or if they struggle to prove the…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Criminal Justice System is the system of law enforcement that is directly involved in apprehending, prosecuting, defending, sentencing and punishes those who is suspected or convicted of criminal offenses. The two main systems are the State and Federal: The state criminal justice systems handles crime committed within their state boundaries while the Federal criminal justice system handles crimes committed on federal property or in several states; Federal crimes compared to state crimes are more severe and the jail times are longer. The Jury plays a central role in the justice system,in a trial the jury hears evidence, testimonies, and determines whether it satisfies the crime. (Burns, Ronald G. The Criminal Justice System. Upper Saddle…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Self Defense

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are justice system to make correction when individual that breaks the law. The concept of two affirmative in the law has been placed for a purpose. Those are tools that are able to help with interrogation and also in the legal system of courts. People break the laws for many reasons some do it because of their beliefs, out of revenge and others just behave that way. Some people feel like it’s a necessity to do something out of the law because they don’t want to feel control by the government. There are many ways to prove if someone innocent or guilty in the court system based on the crime they committed. There are two affirmative defenses which typically possesses the burden of production as well as the burden of persuasion, justification…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays