Preview

Advocating for the United States Abolition of Torture

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advocating for the United States Abolition of Torture
Advocating for the United States Abolition of Torture

The United States has always prided itself on being a country of freedom. A country with liberty and justice for all. How can we as a nation still pride ourselves on these virtues when we subject people to torture? Where does the line get drawn when we allow torture to be used? We look at the Constitutional rights and the Geneva Convention, as having rules which clearly frown upon the use of torture. However under the Patriot Act we have seen the use of powers under this act to allow the use of torture which contradict the Constitution and the Geneva Convention, which were intended to stop the use of torture, and this become an issue. Do we terminate the use of torture, or do we continue to use the cruel, inhumane, and degrading acts on captivated ‘terrorists’? The United States has violated the United States Constitutional rights by justifying the use of torture while abusing the laws set up to make boundaries against torture. Prisoners have certain Constitutional rights:
“Inmates of American prisons do not have the full constitutional civil rights of an ordinary citizen, but they do receive some protection under the Constitution. Among these rights are the right to a punishment that is not cruel and unusual, due process, the right of access to parole and the right not to be discriminated against.” (Faranda) I agree that prisoners shouldn’t have all the same rights as everyone else, but I do not agree with the use of torture on prisoners who have been captured and held as suspected terrorist because they deserve the right to be treated humanely.
The Constitution was ratified in June 1788, and in September 1789, Congress approved all 12 amendments and then directed them to all the states for ratification. Then, in December 1791, 10 out of the original 12 amendments were formally incorporated in the United States constitution. When the Constitution was created it was for the purpose of creating a



Bibliography: Faranda, Jon. “Constitutional Rights of Inmates.”eHow. 2012. 14 Jan. 2012. Current Controversies Series. Greenhaven Press, 2006. Infotrac. WSHS Library. 15 Dec. 2011. <http://ic.galegroup.com>. web. Mehta, Suketu. “ Who wrote the Bill of Rights.” Buzzle.Com. 2010. 14 Jan. 2012. <http://www.buzzle.com/articles/who-wrote-the-bill-of-rights.html>.web. Ninomiya, Kent. “What Is the Patriot Act.”eHow. 2012. 14 Jan. 2012. <http://www.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    America 's Accountability to its Constitution and the Events at Abu Ghraib - ... While I agree that “severe” is a matter of perspective, what went on at Abu Ghraib, the depraved acts against Iraqis and humanity, were certainly torture. Trying to argue against that point would be somewhere on the order of arguing against gravity. The pictures speak for themselves (Unauthored). And also consider this: the woman who took the infamous Abu Ghraib photographs was “…convicted by a court-martial, in May of 2005, of conspiracy to maltreat prisoners, dereliction of duty, and maltreatment, and sentenced to six months in prison, a reduction in rank, and a bad-conduct discharge (Gourevitch).” So the debate of whether or not Abu Ghraib was torture seems…

    • 6771 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every American has their own idea and values of what America is what America stands for. In my America, we should not mass torture people and dehumanize them due to the fact that we can. In 2003, at Abu Ghraib prison, in Baghdad, American soldiers violated the rights and tortured Iraqi prisoners. The soldiers made the prisoners strip down and do humiliating acts while not wearing any clothes. What happened at the Abu Ghraib prison is an example of what can happen when one loses sight of their ethical positions.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787, by the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and ratified by conventions in eleven States. It went into effect on March 4, 1789. The historical influences behind the constitution included Aristotle, the Magna Carta, the writings of John Locke, and the English Bill of Rights from 1689.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the number of prisoners increase within the prison systems today, a question has risen on should prisoners lose their constitutional rights while in prison. Constitutional rights are the rights that are granted to the citizens by the government. These rights can’t be taken away legally. The way a prisoner is treated is not based on their behaviors or what crime they’ve committed, but is left up to the administrators of the prison. “In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the federal courts began to oversee state prison systems and develop a body of law dealing with prisoners ' rights. During the 1980s, however, a more conservative Supreme Court limited prisoners…

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Truth about Torture,” Charles Krauthammer critically analyzes the John McCain, an individual with tremendous moral influence who was tortured by the North Vietnamese, amendment. This amendment would prohibit all forms of torture from being executed on war prisoners of America. In response, Krauthammer states that in certain scenarios, torture is not “just permissible, but also morally required.” He divides the war prisoners into the following three classifications: ordinary soldiers arrested on the battlefield, captured terrorists, and finally, terrorists who possess information. With regards to the ordinary soldiers, McCain’s amendment is justified because although these war prisoners are on the opposite side of the conflict, they are nonetheless lawful fighters who committed no crime. On the contrary, Krauthammer believes that the terrorists are not worthy of the same protection and privileges since they intend to harm innocent citizens.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torture is illegal because it breaks the 8th Amendment of the Constitution. The Constitution states that the 8th Amendment of the Constitution states that cruel and unusual punishment is illegal . “The detainees were sexually humiliated for punishment and for fun in Guantanamo Bay” (ThinkProgress). These are not only illegal but they are hate crimes too, The US government makes the guards believe that all of the detainees are bad because they are Muslims when they are not. EIT breaks the 8th amendment so it must be abolished.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should torture be once again instituted by American interrogators? No; torture is degrading, inhumane, and futile. Torture is a violation of human rights, and prohibited in international law (“Convention”). The use of waterboarding damages the American government’s credibility. The act should never…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of torture, most of us will readily agree that torturing someone in order to get information is not the answer. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of how guilty a person is, and what should be done in the case of a bombing. On the one hand, people argue that torture is unconstitutional and should not be practiced because it questions a person’s morality and what they are willing to do in order to get results. On the other hand, however, others argue that we should allow torture because it is more just than allowing thousands of innocents to die because we didn’t want to question a single person. I have mixed feelings on the topic. While I recognize that our actions may be for the greater good, we cannot allow ourselves to lose our morality because of it. I do not believe that a person should be tortured for information unless it is under specific circumstances. What I mean by this is that people should not torture someone unless that person is obviously guilty or it is…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Torture Ever Ok?

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages

    As a I discussed in my third essay, there are many disputes between people on whether or not torture should ever be allowed. I am writing my opinion on this heated issue and explaining why torture should be allowed under extreme circumstances. Extreme instances that should allocate torture are: times of war, a terrorist attack, or high profile criminal activity. If lives are at stake in these circumstances than I believe torturing someone is permissible. Torturing can be a way of defending those people, but should be the last option. A lot of times in these scenarios there are no other options and torturing someone is the only way to get fast results before it is too late. I am a utilitarian thinker and I believe in the greatest good for the most people. If a lot of people 's lives are at stake in a situation and can be saved because of one criminal 's pain then torturing is the way to go. I believe that torture can be morally justified in many extreme circumstances and by regulating torture by law then it could benefit our society.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay About Torture

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    far better than harming thousands. However, I think there is no scenario where it is acceptable to torture innocent children.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussions of ticking time bombs, one controversial issue has been how to deal with the alleged guilty terrorist once he is captured. On the one hand, some people, including Michael Levin, a libertarian writer and educator, argue that it is in the US government’s right to torture the guilty terrorist because his knowledge could be used to save the lives of millions. On the other hand, others, such as Philip Heymann, who is a writer that had worked in the government field, firmly states that torture should never be used because the chance that it will produce true and useful information is nearly impossible and it is vastly more crucial to preserve the international bans on torture. Shirley Jackson elaborates on Heymann’s view when she…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War on Terror has produced several different viewpoints on the utilization of torture and its effectiveness as a means to elicit information. A main argument has been supplied that torture is ineffective in its purpose to gather information from the victim. The usefulness of torture has been questioned because prisoners might use false information to elude their torturers, which has occurred in previous cases of torture. It has also been supposed that torture is necessary in order to use the information to save many lives. Torture has been compared to civil disobedience. In addition, the argument has been raised that torture is immoral and inhumane. Lastly, Some say that the acts are not even regarded as torture.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torture should not be legalized by the government because it is wrong. Torture does not represent America. To me, America represents freedom and torture is not an aspect of freedom. Every human being has its own rights protected by the human rights conversion, and not being tortured is one of them. As such torture should not be allowed in any case. If the government allows torture that means they have violated the international law and if one fundamental human right is violated today it may lead to more human rights violation and this is something that none of us wants. We are all equal in front of the law, and no one has the right to treat somebody else less than that, no…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Article five of the United Nations Convention against Torture outlines that everyone has a right to humane treatment. It states that every person has the right to have his physical, mental, and moral integrity respected and that no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhumane, or degrading punishment or treatment. Torturing someone is denying them of their rights as a person regardless of the situation. No one should be subjected to endure the physical and mental pain that is accompanied when their getting tortured. Making it morally justifiable for someone to be tortured in some situations and not justifiable in others is inconsistent with society. If you make it okay for torture to be permissible then you have to make killing permissible. Torture is similar to…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torture is define as cruel action that can be made by a superior for an immoral action. People have different opinions when it comes to the topic of torture. Are you on the good side or bad side do you know? Sometimes torture can be justified: I’m not saying that torture can be acceptable, but in some cases it’s necessary. Torture is the process of saving lives I would say in other words is obtaining information from a convict of whichever the case is that can be helpful for the superiors to find out what happen.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays