Preview

Enhanced Interrogation Techniques: Should It Be Abolished?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
362 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Enhanced Interrogation Techniques: Should It Be Abolished?
Enhanced Interrogation Techniques(EIT) are the process of getting needed information through physically harming someone. The United Nations(UN) definition of the enhanced interrogation program is a form of torture used by the CIA and the DIA on black sites. EIT must be abolished because it is illegal and it produces unreliable information. Torture is illegal because it breaks the 8th Amendment of the Constitution. The Constitution states that the 8th Amendment of the Constitution states that cruel and unusual punishment is illegal . “The detainees were sexually humiliated for punishment and for fun in Guantanamo Bay” (ThinkProgress). These are not only illegal but they are hate crimes too, The US government makes the guards believe that all of the detainees are bad because they are Muslims when they are not. EIT breaks the 8th amendment so it must be abolished. …show more content…
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, a planner of the 9/11 attacks, was waterboarded 183 times at Guantanamo Bay before he gave any information. The information he gave was fake (CNN). There are so many black sites. A black site is a place where it is constitutionally legal to torture someone. These are all around the world, none in the US. The US government makes the guards believe that all of the detainees are bad because they are Muslims when they are not. By using torture this produces unreliable
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Enhanced Interrogations Keep America Safe Summary
    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Enhanced Interrogations Keep America Safe Summary

    Terror, suffering, and murder of innocent civilians struck America on September 11, 2001. Four planes caused the world to stop turning and changed the future of the country and world forever. However, this was not the first time America had been hit by foreign terrorists; numerous times throughout the previous decade America had been attacked not only on American soil but also at American embassies and facilities in foreign nations (Cheney). In an effort to thwart impending attacks on the homeland, the US government authorized “enhanced interrogations,” as Dick Cheney calls them, on high profile terrorists to gain information (Cheney). This decision has caused uproar in the nation prompting people to debate where the line between necessary for national security and morality should be drawn. In April of 2009, Cheney released an article describing why he believed that these interrogations were necessary. Throughout the article, he incorporated numerous facts and…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Guantanamo Bay Vs 9/11
    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Guantanamo Bay Vs 9/11

    After the 2001 September 11th attacks, the Bush administration needed a secure place to keep its enemies captured in the “war on terror”. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had already established “black sites”, or secret detention centres, all over the world. However, the Bush administration needed a location outside of international law so they could keep detainees indefinitely while interrogating them without legal intervention. They also needed a location that would not become a target for another terrorist attack. Guantanamo Bay was the ideal location, as it is an American Navy base that is under American control but is not under American sovereignty and is far enough from American territory that a terrorist attack would not be a…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    9-11 Interrogation Methods
    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    9-11 Interrogation Methods

    The U.N defines torture as a way people get answers from detainees. The CIA would use harmful techniques to figure out what someone did, and how they did it (“5 Interrogation Methods”). One of the techniques used to get out answers was waterboarding. People are put on the ground or anywhere and they have a towel on their face. The prison guard would pour the water all over the other person's face to imitate drowning (“5 Interrogation Methods”). Having said this, because of the interrogation less people have been attacked and the CIA has found more…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eight Amendment Pros And Cons
    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eight Amendment Pros And Cons

    With the eighth this is sometimes hard to see because the people who commit crimes against this must do it in secret. However there have been some cases where the law is broken and there is no way for those being tortured or any witnesses to report it. This was the case in a jail in Oregon where the inmates would seriously injure and even kill each other and the officials and guards in the jail would do nothing about it. In other words, they were using the inmates as a form of torture against the inmates being killed. In other cases legal organizations like the C.I.A. are able to torture suspects and cover it by saying they’re interrogating the suspects.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compaire and Contrast of Torture
    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compaire and Contrast of Torture

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mill, Utilitarianism, and Waterboarding
    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mill, Utilitarianism, and Waterboarding

    Guantanamo Bay is a US prison for terrorists and other threatening people, located off of US soil. This means that the processes that go on in the institution, legally, do not need to follow US rules. Many painful and tortuous things are performed on the prisoners, such as force feeding and the topic of this essay, water boarding, where the victim is made to feel as though they are drowning. Although Gitmo is legal/allowed to an extent, it still begs the question how the guards consciously perform such cruel acts and what I would do if I were faced with the decision of torturing a prisoner or not.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Advocating for the United States Abolition of Torture
    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Advocating for the United States Abolition of Torture

    The United States has violated the United States Constitutional rights by justifying the use of torture while abusing the laws set up to make boundaries against torture. Prisoners have certain Constitutional rights:…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Guantánamo Bay Research Paper
    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Guantánamo Bay Research Paper

    constrainment camp at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba [Credit: © Pres Panayotov/Shutterstock.com]The camp was more than once decried by worldwide human rights and charitable affiliations—including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the International Committee of the Red Cross—furthermore by the European Union and the Organization of American States (OAS), for guaranteed human rights encroachment, including the usage of distinctive sorts of torment in the midst of rounds of questioning. As a result of such input, the Bush association generally requested that detainees were all around cared for and that none of the "redesigned round of questioning techniques" used on a couple of prisoners were anguishing. (In 2009, then again, the U.S. official responsible for military commissions at Guantánamo announced that the detainee suspected as a possible burglar in the September 11 attacks couldn't be charged in light of the way that he had been tormented.) Additionally, as demonstrated by U.S. powers, the usage of such frameworks had a great part of the time—e.g., in the round of questioning of Khalid Sheik Muhammad, the attested main thrust of the September 11 plot—yielded beneficial information on the organization, schedules, and game plans of al-Qaeda and other terrorist…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eifs Pros And Cons
    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Eifs Pros And Cons

    In addition to the overwhelming public support for the use of EITs, the same ABC News survey found that 53% of Americans believe that the interrogation techniques used by the CIA produced important information for the United States fight against terror, and indeed they were correct. Of the 119 individuals detained after the 9/11 and subjected to EITs only 26 did not provide actionable intelligence or were “wrongfully held” (Ashkenas). In addition, only 3 detainees were subjected to the harshest technique of waterboarding. Waterboarding is defined by the BBC…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Waterboarding Unethical
    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Is Waterboarding Unethical

    Waterboarding is a torture technique used by military personnel to retrieve information, or at least attempt, from terrorist during investigations. In recent events Donald Trump has stated “…it actually works…” and it’s time to “…fight fire with fire.”(“Donald Trump says torture ‘absolutely works’—but does it?) However, despite the theory that it works, many other factors apply to the reasoning of why it should not be used. Waterboarding is a torturous, unethical, murderous method of interrogation and should be illegal.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Torture And Civil Liberties
    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Torture And Civil Liberties

    CIA agent’s still use methods of torture to get information and evidence out of suspects. Forms of torture used are forced nudity, stress positions and sleep, but the most effective and popular forms are waterboarding is when water is poured over the face of an immobilized captive, thus causing the individual to experience the sensation of drowning, sensory deprivation is used to instill a sense of fear, disorientation and cause dependency on their captor,l, and beating.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Torturous English Assignment
    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Torturous English Assignment

    Should torture be once again instituted by American interrogators? No; torture is degrading, inhumane, and futile. Torture is a violation of human rights, and prohibited in international law (“Convention”). The use of waterboarding damages the American government’s credibility. The act should never…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Waterboarding during interrogations
    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Waterboarding during interrogations

    Law enforcement agencies and governments have long used torture to question criminals and terrorists. It is used to coax confessions or to find out any sort of information that may lead to the arrest or capture of other criminals. Although the torturing of prisoners in the United States is strictly prohibited by the constitution, the government started using the tactic waterboarding against terrorists. Although the government says waterboarding has led to prevention on mass terrorist attacks on U.S soil, it is not accepted by all of this country’s citizens. It is believed by certain people that waterboarding is torture and others do not believe it is. I believe this method is wrong and it is my goal to explore why the United States deemed this technique necessary and why I believe it is unconstitutional.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture
    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Torture

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong
    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    That is one of many arguments our government makes when it comes to torture. Additionally, there are a certain group of people that agree with our government to do the inhumane action towards detainees. However, that is not always the case. From Duke University, Robin Kirk expressed, “Torture is wrong; it does not make us safer; it does not work; it paves the way for further and more reprehensible torture; it stains those who practice it; it damages torture practitioners, who live with the effects for the rest of their lives” (234). The case of torture that the American government uses is wrong and not the safest way to keep the people protected.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics