Second draft of the book. The current recognised legal age for responsibility is 18, but should this be? Alan Greenblatt’s article “What is the Age of Responsibility”, presents neuroscience research that shows how a human’s brain doesn’t fully develop until much later than 18. The age suggested by scientists is 25, but Greenblatt explains how most people are able to handle making adult decisions at around 21.Now, this is when someone can legally drink alcohol, so the age is already familiar to society. Making 21 the perfect new age of responsibility, the age where someone is capable of being an adult both emotionally and physically, through brain development.…
Changing the driving age to 18 does nothing but change their age if you leave it alone and leaving the driving age to 16 with more practice time behind the wheel will give them some responsibilities and more freedom to themselves. Soon they will become adults and need to have their responsibilities in order to keep them up with the rest of the world and keep themselves together. Do you think the 16 year olds can learn responsibilities young or do you prefer safer streets with possible irresponsible…
There are a lot of things wrong with American laws but I believe one thing is right, the drinking age. In the article "What is the Age of Responsibility?", contributors Franklin Zimring and Alexander Wagenaar support my belief that adulthood starts at the age of 21.…
I’m sure there are parents out there who don’t agree with raising the driving age to eighteen. They might think that this is a bad thing because they might need help running errands like going to get groceries or getting their younger siblings from activities they might’ve had. But in the end, would you really want your kid to be going onto the road not as educated about driving at sixteen, or waiting and driving when they are ready at eighteen? They will be more responsible, mature, and raising the age limit could be helpful to the teenagers life and…
If someone's friend steals something, does the innocent friend go to jail? No. If a teen gets into a fatal accident, does another teen not involved get their license suspended? Of course not, but those who think the driving age should be raised are wanting this to happen. They are labeling all teens before they got into an accident or even before they got behind the wheel. They believe that because of someone's birth date, they are by definition dangerous (“Lund”). The minimum driving age should stay at 16 of age because if it is raised, it will delay the experience of driving and it will cause an inconvenience for parents.…
In my response the driving age should not be raised. This concern has been a problem then and still is today. The Driving age should not be raised , one reason is 16 or 17 year olds drive everywhere in case of emergencies , for work , school and we shouldn’t take that away from them. If the 16 year old or 17 year old are trying to drive they at least should have a permit and should require it so that if they get stopped by a patrolling officer they know if they have the privilege to drive or not and should get fine if they are caught without a permit. It’s important to learn how to drive at an early age because it can really help if their is some type of emergency throughout the family and they need to drive to the hospital or a parent can’t drive anymore and needs to be driven.…
The problem is the people question why the drinking age is 21 and not 18 when can you buy tabaco legally at the age of 18 and you can’t buy alcohol at 18 too. I believe the drinking age should be 21 because teen’s brains are not done growing at the age of 18 and they could be damaged. My first reason is that when the law was moved to 21 the drunk driving dropped. My second reason is that when teens start drinking at such a young age they can have several health problems when they get older so by making it 21 it will lower the risk of having health problems when you get older. My third reason is that teens could become violent or have destructive behaviors.…
If the drinking age was changed from 21 to 18 the number of arrests would skyrocket. “In 2011, at least 23% of auto collisions involved cell phones (Texting and driving safety).” Teenagers are already distracted behind the wheel when we add the influence of alcohol not only will the teen be a danger to their self but they will also be a danger to others on the road. One quote that truly sparks the fire in this argument is “it is not (usually) alcohol that kills, it is drunken driving that kills (Eastman).” This quote truly speaks volume in this argument because when you look at this statist of car accidents from the CDC “In 2014, 2,270 teens in the United States ages 16–19 were killed and 221,313 were treated in emergency departments for injuries suffered in motor vehicle crashes.1 That means that six teens ages 16–19 died every day from motor vehicle injuries” you can see that teens have a high risk of getting in accidence because of so many distractions from texting, listening to music, or when they are with a group of friends, now when we add alcohol as a contributing factor we will see that no one will be safe on the road, because in the quote mentioned above alcohol is not what kills it the drunken driver and when we drink we lose the mental capacity of what makes sense and what doesn’t we believe we can do things we…
Lowering the driving age would minimise the amount of stress that is put on parents and the young adult, as there is so much stress on parents, as they are having to get everyone to everywhere on time, but also get themselves to places on time. Which does not allow time for a parent to have time for themselves (especially for a parent whom parents alone). For the adolescent who is not relying on others, will make them have more responsibilities and can be taken more accountable for their own action in…
Why consider Asian American as a single homogeneous entity is wrong in conducting health disparity search?…
According to Vogel this suggestion, many people would make the argument that teens are not in full control of their actions due to immaturity and lack of knowledge of the world (Vogel, 1994). However, the government has already deemed this age group able to have a job or drive a car. Think about it, how is it that these people that the government puts responsible in some ways are suddenly too immature to realize that they are pointing a gun at someone or physically or sexually assaulting another human being well that is where society is wrong in believing they are mature. Where is the magical line drawn that says one teen is responsible and mature and another is not? The truth is that state and federal guidelines simply attach an age to privileges. Why is it not such a simple process for determining if someone is of legal age to stand adult trial, I will tell you why because society wants to give them another chance to regain their mentality? Another concern that opponents of sending juveniles to adult court for violent crimes would argue is that these “kids” are not in control of their actions or responsible for their crimes because they have been in poor home and…
It was 11 o' clock at night, and I was driving back from a friend's house on a Saturday night. As I was crossing an intersection, bright blue and red lights were flashing on the right side. As I turned to look to satisfy my curiosity, I noticed a car was upside down and another car had crashed into the side of the road. It was devastating to see and of course I wanted to know what had happened. I went home and turned on the local news to see if there was any media coverage about this accident. Unfortunately, a drunk driver had caused the accident. As we mature we are given more freedoms, and have to make choices that are right for us. In my opinion, the legal drinking age should not be lowered to eighteen because there would be accidents on the road. Another thing is that most people persist in believing that they can drink and still be alert drivers, yet not realizing that alcohol is still a major factor in at least half of all fatal highway accidents. Alcoholism can cause rapid poisoning and it is really east for someone to be addicted to alcohol, and become…
Young adolescences that live in states that allow them to drink at a young age are showing areas of less fatalities overall. That is a sign that the young people are more responsible they older people at age at twenty-one. Individuals that grow up to drinking a at young age will show that they can drive and be very responsible and earned that right to drink and drive. There will be evidence that will back lowering the drinking to eighteen should happen soon.…
Teenage accident rates and mortality rates have increased dramatically over the years. Nothing that the parents do and law enforces will protect the teens all the time, especially from themselves. Teenagers do not realize the responsibility that comes with driving. They are often distracted with other things such as texting while driving. Most importantly, parents always worry about the safety of their kids on the road. Some people may say that the driving age should stay at the age of 16; however, raising the driving age to 18 will create safer and more responsible drivers. Firstly, teenagers are very careless. In addition, increasing the minimum driving age will allow teenagers more time to get comfortable with driving. Finally, the number of fatal accidents will be reduced. Therefore, the minimum driving age should be raised from 16 to 18.…
The age of criminal responsibility is the age below which is deemed incapable of having committed a criminal offence. The age of criminal responsibility in NSW is 10, no one under 10 can be charged with a crime. This is usually extended to 14.…