Preview

Airpower During Ww2

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1777 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Airpower During Ww2
Strategic decisions seek to create an advantageous position over one’s opponent through the employment of the instruments of national power, and during World War II (WWII) airpower introduced a new and powerful element into the equation. Generally, there are considered four instruments of national power: diplomatic, informational, military, economic (DIME). These instruments are the tools utilized by decision makers for the projection of power in support of national interests or objectives. Airpower played a role in the employment of each of these instruments during WWII, and in-turn, greatly influenced the strategic decision-making of both the Allies and the Axis. An examination of this role of airpower in each of these areas will demonstrate …show more content…
Put more simply, one must bring a carrot or a stick to the negotiating table. Airpower enabled the use of both of these mechanisms during WWII. In 1938, Adolf Hitler invaded and annexed sections of Czechoslovakia. As a result, Europe’s major powers (excluding the Soviet Union) held a conference in Munich, Germany, to discuss the annexation. Rather than condemn Germany for their actions, Britain and France chose to do nothing in hopes that this small appeasement would prevent war and further aggression by Germany. A key factor in this decision was the perceived strength of the new German Air Force, the Luftwaffe (Yenne, 65). Not only did Britain and France not want war, they certainly did not want war when they were at a disadvantage. Hitler had the stick. Airpower played a key role in enabling Germany to achieve their objectives …show more content…
Military leaders could no longer conduct ANY military operation without consideration for this new dimension of warfare. True, airpower would affect decision-making in doctrine, technology, procurement, and countless other areas, but what ultimately changed at the strategic level of decision-making was that the character of war had changed. Whether it was an Air Force, Army, Marine, or Naval operation, airpower could not be ignored. The Allies recognized that in order for Operation Overlord to be effective, they must have air superiority over the beaches. As a result, the ground operation would be delayed time and time again. The Allies launched missions targeting the German railways and roads to prevent the ability of the Germans to reinforce ground forces, but more importantly the bombers targeted the Luftwaffe. On the last day of what was referred to as the “Big Week,” the Allies struck the Messerschmitt Factory, which was the largest producer of fighter aircraft (Yenne, 182). Shortly thereafter, the Allies achieved the air superiority necessary for the amphibious operation to be conducted. Airpower had become a new and instrumental variable in the decision-making process when it came to the employment of the military

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction The United States originally desired to remain neutral during World War II. The war, however, continued to grow and ultimately the United States knew they could not continue to watch from afar and would have to enter for the sake of its own sovereignty as well as that of its allies. The Allied Forces needed to oust German occupiers from Western Europe and therefore proceeded to plan the largest amphibious and airborne attacks at the time. This analysis will examine the first few days of Operation Overlord.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Operation Overload, as it was technically called, is the largest amphibious operation in history. It started on June 6th, 1944 in Normandy, France. Even with the extensive planning, General Norman Cota, a strong operational leader, warned his troops to expect the unexpected. There were minimal German forces defending the area, concluding that Operation Bodyguard had worked. 14,674 sorties(one round trip to target and back by plane) were flown in a mere 8 hours. During the invasion, Dwight D. Eisenhower, A five star general and later, the 34th president of the United States, talked in a broadcast to the people of German-occupied Europe promising their liberation. Strategy on D-Day was critically important to this massive invasion. For example, two bridges, called the Pegasus and Horsa bridges were key for German reinforcements to reach Normandy. The night before the attack, two gliders landed near these bridges, carrying a couple Allied soldiers. The soldiers easily defeated the German guards and captured the bridges. This prevented reinforcements from meeting the landing troops. Allied troops were dropped out of planes to capture the Merville battery. The anti-aircraft guns on the battery scared the pilots and the paratroopers were dropped too early and critical supplies like mortars, radios, and mine detectors were lost or too damaged to use. Even with these problems, the Allied troops ousted out the…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intimidation from Fascist leaders was a factor that led to the illogical events of World War II. Adolf Hitler, chancellor of Germany, justified his barbaric actions on his attempt to benefit the "superior" German race. The effects of his ambitions were displayed during the Munich Conference in 1938. Hitler invited the Prime Minister of Britain and the Premier of France and demanded that the Sudetenland become part of Germany. Due to France and Britain's fear of another war, Hitler's demand was accepted. The appeasement, or agreement in order to maintain peace, at the Munich Conference was said to have "saved Europe from a world war," as stated by William Shirer. Contrary to Shirer, Europe would still be involved in war and things would only get worse.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of them being that Germany was frustrated over the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was upset that they had to follow unfair demands, including paying for all of the damages of World War I, lessening their armies, and limiting their military. In time, an aggressive ruler in Germany came to power named Adolf Hitler. Hitler felt that the outcome of the Treaty of Versailles was unfair, so he did the opposite of what the treaty stated and put all the money into building a stronger military. As time went on, Germany wanted to reunite their brother land (doc 1). Since other powerful countries feared the power of Hitler and his army, they gave into him, following the policy of appeasement. They agreed to the terms in which the “Big Four” gave Czechoslovakia over to Germany in order to resist war (doc 4). Hitler believed it was their right to the land because Germany owned it, post-World War I. In addition, at the start of World War II, most nations were in a worldwide depression. This state of depression, made it easier for aggressive and charismatic rulers to take control over weak nations. The people hoped the powerful rulers would help to fix and change the economy. Many of the great powers thought it was a good idea to give into appeasement. On the other hand, many disagreed and argued that by giving into one demand today would cause the nation to weaken “tomorrow” (doc…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think the most effective response is with out a doubt collective security. (Doc 4) In 1938 Britain, France, and Italy met with Hitler to discuss his demand for the Sudetenland. Hitler got what he wanted from this meeting because of appeasement. Europe was happy from this because it avoided war. This did not benefit the Czechs at all though. For some reason Neville Chamberlain favored appeasement. (Doc 5) He thinks appeasement is the best way because he believes war is a "fearful thing." He thinks that appeasement will benefit Europe. Winston Churchill disagreed with Chamberlain's policy of appeasement. (Doc 6) He believed that keeping peace depends on holding back the aggressor. He also thinks we lost many opportunities in the quest for peace. He believes it was the people in control of our political affairs fault. Another view on appeasement was also put out there by A.J.P. Taylor. It stated that since the majority of German people put Hitler into power they were the only ones that could turn him out. Also he said some "appeasers" feared that the defeat of Germany would be followed by Russian domination over most of Europe. In another excerpt an author named Keith Eubank states that stopping Hitler prior to 1939 was not an issue. (Doc 9) He says that Hitler had too massive of a force and that nothing he had done had been considered that dangerous at that point in time. All this options but still if the rest of the country didn't do something besides just keeping appeasement Hitler was going to just keep demanding more and more. This would have left Europe ten times worse off. They made the right choice on going into Collective Security. They should have done this from the beginning instead of wasting so much time and losing so much, to just end up going into war anyways, just later in time. Collective Security…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appeasement policy, contrary to its aim, encouraged aggression, because each time Hitler was appeased, it simply inflated his appetite and confidence. Whenever Hitler violated the Treaty of Versailles, Britain and France only protested, but accepted his actions almost till it seemed like outright surrender. In March 1935 Hitler announced Germany's rearmament policy to increase her army, navy and reintroduce conscription, the allies did little to stop him and Britain even sympathised believing the Treaty was too harsh. France and Britain also failed to react when Hitler remilitarised the Rhineland in 1936 as he claimed had a right to place troops on his own border. Viewing this as a sign of weakness, it only encouraged him, and in March 1938, he annexed Austria and turned towards Czechoslovakia. By 1938 Hitler announced he was ready to fight for Sudenten Germans in Czechoslovakia, and after a meeting with Britain, France and Italy, known as the Munich Conference he was given the Sudentland to avoid conflict. According to Allan Bullock, this is one reason why Hitler risked attacking Poland in 1939, as opposed to a year earlier; due to his increased confidence and his conviction that his opponents where not as daring or skillful, shown in their allowances to him in Munich and therefore would appease him again. The policy…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler did not want to advance on to foreign territory first. He explained that the first thing he wanted to accomplish was to secure all of Germany; he wanted all of Germany to stand with him and support him. While accomplishing this, he decided to secretly grow his military (in 1933-1934). It gave him time to prepare for war and grow the country. Growing his military was a breach of the Treaty of Versailles, but the Allies weren’t aware. However, using appeasement was basically pointless. Although the allies weren’t aware of the secret growth of Hitler’s military, they could have used collective security in the near time future to stand up as a power and attack Germany upfront. It would have been more effective, as appeasing to Hitler was just giving him what he wanted, whenever he…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hence, with reference to sources ranging from books, speeches and journal articles such as, Clodfelter, Mark’s book “The limits of Airpower, The American bombing of North Vietnam” and Lyndon B. Johnson speech, “"Tragedy, Disappointment, and…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Munich Agreement and Appeasement policy was a controversial policy employed by the British to avoid a war that would destroy them. Their tactics brought Appeasement to the center of political debate, creating multiple views of this strategy. Chamberlain, the man responsible, was viewed differently by separate political parties. This tactic was Britain’s last chance at avoiding a war that they were in no shape to fight in.…

    • 2820 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mission Command

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages

    With German forces on the run following the Allied success at Normandy and the breakout and pursuit across France, Allied forces were staged to enter Germany in late summer 1944. Both Field Marshal Montgomery and General Bradley clamored to be given the priority of effort. General Eisenhower chose Montgomery’s Operation MARKET GARDEN as the plan for action. It called for airborne forces to open the route for a ground force to move more than sixty miles up a single road, ending up north of the Rhine River near Arnhem, Netherlands. By accomplishing this task, the German Ruhr industrial heartland would be within easy grasp. But the operation failed. The ground force did not make it to the last bridge; it was six more months before Allied forces crossed the Lower Rhine River near Arnhem. Between 17 and 26 September 1944, there were 17,000 Allied casualties including eighty percent of the 1st Airborne Division (UK). The historical evidence overwhelmingly shows that the British 1st Airborne Division lost the Battle of Arnhem because of poor planning. This paper will prove the failure of The Battle of Arnhem was not solely the fault of MG Roy Urquhart. Although this was his first command of such a division (being an "outsider") could he have not completed his wartime mission any better despite having inexperienced leaders planning airborne operations, bad intelligence, allowing the Air Force to plan the DZs based off what was best for the air movement plan and poor execution. This paper examines MG Urquhart, the commander of 1st Airborne Division (UK).…

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    To begin with, states are critical actors in international relations because they have power, which is the ability not only to influence others but to control outcomes of various events in a way that would not have occurred naturally. States have power vis-à-vis each other and with respect to those within the state. Yet power itself is a multidimensional relationship; there are different kinds of power. The outcome of the power relationship-whether and to what extent power is used or abused-is determined, in part, by the power potential of each of the parties involved. Power is thus the means by which international actors like states deal with each other.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Chan, D. 2000. “Airwars in Asia: Competitive and Collaborative Strategic and Tactics in Action. “Emerald Management and Development, 19:473-488.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit II The Modern State System; Power and its elements; National Interest; Balance of Power; Collective Security; Role of Ideology; Foreign Policy – its determinants; Instruments of Foreign Policy – Diplomacy, Propaganda, Economic Instruments and War.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Air Power is a relatively recent addition to military power. Born in the early twentieth century it has matured in just some eighty years, a relatively short time, and come to occupy a central position in the mustering of a nation’s military might. India’s Air Power has made great progress from its humble beginnings in 1932. The past 74 years bear testimony to the country’s growing prowess in air operations. Understanding the evolution of the IAF to see how we have come to where we are is vital to chart the future course of the IAF. This understanding of the evolution also gives an indication of the effectiveness of policies and strategies used in the past and in force on date, further projection and refinement of which, would yield tomorrow’s strategy, and required capabilities along with the required force structure.…

    • 9400 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays