Preview

How Did The Munich Agreement And Appeasement A Controversial Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2820 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Munich Agreement And Appeasement A Controversial Policy
The Munich Agreement and Appeasement policy was a controversial policy employed by the British to avoid a war that would destroy them. Their tactics brought Appeasement to the center of political debate, creating multiple views of this strategy. Chamberlain, the man responsible, was viewed differently by separate political parties. This tactic was Britain’s last chance at avoiding a war that they were in no shape to fight in. However, they put themselves in this undesirable position by political errors that severely crippled them. There are many possible rationales of why representatives of Britain signed the Munich Agreement, and why they thought that avoiding war would be beneficial to the country. Another reason was that Britain did …show more content…
Also, in 1939, appeasement was described as “a clever plan of selling off your friends to buy off your enemies.” It is clear that appeasing to Hitler was a controversial action, and was used because it was a last-ditch effort for peace. People began saying that appeasement was a weak and fearful tactic, so in 1950, Winston Churchill, a British politician, defended the idea of appeasement by stating that it was a noble, intelligent strategy. The perception of appeasement also changed over a two-year span. Before 1937, appeasement was viewed by a large majority of people as a positive action that calmed hostility between countries. However, after 1939, the view of appeasement completely changed. People thought of appeasement as negative, and that it was simply “buying off” your enemies or “sacrificing principles” to satisfy an enemy. A. J. P. Taylor, Author of The Origins of the Second World War, argues that there were several critical errors made by Chamberlain that caused the war to be inevitable, such as Chamberlain offering a unilateral military guarantee to Poland in March of 1939. This was a devastating consequence …show more content…
It did not prevent a war, in fact not long after this World War II started. On the morning of September 26, an unofficial version of the Godesberg Terms appeared in the New York Times that had been released by the Czechoslovak government. That weekend, the whole country was preparing for war. Everyone seemed to recognize the fact that they had failed, and that a catastrophic war was going to occur. The population was still recovering from World War I. For most of the population, their only memories of World War I were digging trenches, which at the time they still vividly remembered. World War II would bring greater terror and death than any of them could have thought of. According to Harold Macmillan, the British people were “grimly, but quietly and soberly, making up their minds to face war.” They knew they failed. At 11:15 AM on September 3, 1939, Neville Chamberlain broadcasted to the nation, “We are now at war.” This was the official British declaration of war on Germany. At this moment, the Munich Agreement had failed. The Allies’ effort in preventing a war had been futile, and a Second World War had

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Apush Dbq 11 Essay

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. Axis Powers—in World War II, the nations of Germany, Italy, and Japan, which had formed an alliance in 1936…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History 1378 Review Terms

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Appeasement – the policy of acceding to the demands of a potentially hostile nation in the hope of maintaining peace…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He also points out that his policy served to repair the damage caused by the Treaty of Versailles. Chamberlain further states: “Really I have no need to defend my visits to Germany last autumn, for what was the alternative? Nothing that we could have done, nothing that France could have done, or Russia could have done could possibly have saved Czecho-Slovakia from invasion and destruction.” There existed no other solution to German aggression against Czechoslovakia. With the Munich Agreement signed, Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. On the other hand, without an Agreement, it still would have been likely that Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. Thus, Chamberlain remains blameless for German aggression because the German Empire would have invaded Czechoslovakia in either case. After establishing his innocence, Chamberlain states the inevitability of war against the German Empire: “Does not the question inevitably arise in our minds, if it is so easy to discover good reasons for ignoring assurances so solemnly and so repeatedly given, what reliance can be placed upon any other assurances that come from the same source?” How can any of the European powers trust the German Empire after the Munich Agreement was so abruptly ripped up? Any further peace talks will not produce satisfying results because there will always be doubt regarding the German intent to expand its territory. Chamberlain…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ 19

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1939 the world was plunged into World War II because of the Munich Agreement. The Munich Agreement was an agreement regarding the Sudetenland Crisis between the major powers of Europe after a conference held in Munich in Germany in 1938. The Sudetenland was an important region of Czechoslovakia. The Treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty created as a result of six months of negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which put an official end to World War I between the Allies and Central Powers. The Munich Agreement caused many disagreements between European countries. Collective security was a more effective response to aggression than appeasement because more European countries disagreed than agreed with the decision made during the Munich Conference for various reasons and Germany had many ways of keeping its territories under control.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Churchill, a very strong opponent of appeasement, notoriously said “An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last”[1]. However it wasn’t till the late 1960s that official Government documents on the subject were publically released which created a new view on Chamberlain and appeasement and that it was the only realistic policy for Chamberlain and Britain to pursue.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After two days, the British proclaimed war on Germany and World War II had started. On September 17, the Soviets moved into eastern Poland to involve their "authoritative reach" assigned in the mystery convention.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of them being that Germany was frustrated over the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was upset that they had to follow unfair demands, including paying for all of the damages of World War I, lessening their armies, and limiting their military. In time, an aggressive ruler in Germany came to power named Adolf Hitler. Hitler felt that the outcome of the Treaty of Versailles was unfair, so he did the opposite of what the treaty stated and put all the money into building a stronger military. As time went on, Germany wanted to reunite their brother land (doc 1). Since other powerful countries feared the power of Hitler and his army, they gave into him, following the policy of appeasement. They agreed to the terms in which the “Big Four” gave Czechoslovakia over to Germany in order to resist war (doc 4). Hitler believed it was their right to the land because Germany owned it, post-World War I. In addition, at the start of World War II, most nations were in a worldwide depression. This state of depression, made it easier for aggressive and charismatic rulers to take control over weak nations. The people hoped the powerful rulers would help to fix and change the economy. Many of the great powers thought it was a good idea to give into appeasement. On the other hand, many disagreed and argued that by giving into one demand today would cause the nation to weaken “tomorrow” (doc…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Representatives from Nazi Germany and Soviet Union signed the Nazi- Soviet Non -Aggression Pact, which prevented two countries to attack each other. Thus, Germany protected itself from having a war prior to World War 2. In return, Germany gave the Soviet Union land from parts of Poland and Baltic States. Since Hitler was preparing for war in hoping to acquire Poland, he wanted to prevent a two-front war that may cause weakened German forces, so he planned prior to the war and made a pact with the Soviets, creating the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world was plunged into World War II in 1939 for many reasons. There were reasons such as Japan invading Manchuria, Mussolini's attack on Ethiopia, and when Hitler defies The Versailles Treaty. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to WWII. It basically just postponed the War from happening. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries no where and didn't benefit them in the least.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 2 Dbq Essay

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II is the cruel, black scar that marks the back of the Twentieth century. After World War I the seeds of World War Two were planted through the unbearable burdens put on the German people from the infamous treaty of Versailles. With the rise of the notorious dictator Hitler, the German people were hungry for a new beginning. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to World War II. It basically just postponed the War from happening. Leaders arose in countries that were unsatisfied with the results of the past war, World War I. Italy, Germany and Japan took action and no one was stopping them. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries nowhere…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were various ways World War II could have been prevented. Small events led to the immediate cause of World War II, these events could have been averted. Isolationism should have been ended and Fascism could have been fought prior to the death of millions. Countries were selfish, especially the U.S., when it came to getting involved in foreign affairs. Many countries faced their own economic depression and issues, resulting in political leaders turning their concern away from the threat of Germany.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The years leading up to the declaration of war between the Axis and Allied powers in 1939 were tumultuous times for people across the globe. The Great Depression had started a decade before, leaving much of the world unemployed and desperate. Nationalism was sweeping…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obama VS Chamberlain

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When Chamberlain went to Munich on September 29th, 1938, to ask Hitler to discontinue, as he would have said, his plans to take over Poland, Chamberlain had good intention, but bad execution. He claimed that the appeasement was for, "The peace of our time," and that his agreement with Hitler, that which Hitler publically disregarded 7 days later, would allow Europe to continue war-free, sparing it from the trauma and anxiety associated with war. It is well known that Chamberlain failed utterly to accomplish anything with the appeasement, and war did in fact break out the following year. Recently, President Obama went to Geneva to negotiate peace terms with Iran regarding them physically possessing nuclear weapons, and failed to accomplish anything. In fact, Iran slapped America in the face by completely undermining America's request, and this is the cause for much controversy and ill feelings toward Obama as of late.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain gave this speech to the House of Commons on September 1st, 1939, hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. Chamberlain and others had spent years negotiating with Hitler in order to prevent another war in Europe. The point of this speech is too inform people of what Hitler has done and of what the British response will be.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chamberlain suggested appeasement in hopes of keeping peace and avoiding war. He wanted to avoid war for as long as possible and keep the Europe out of war unless a bigger reason arose.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays