Preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of Neville Chamberlain's Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
564 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rhetorical Analysis Of Neville Chamberlain's Speech
British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain gave this speech to the House of Commons on September 1st, 1939, hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. Chamberlain and others had spent years negotiating with Hitler in order to prevent another war in Europe. The point of this speech is too inform people of what Hitler has done and of what the British response will be. In the beginning of his speech, Neville Chamberlain reminds you of his qualifications and actions as leader by stating, “Eighteen months ago in this House I prayed that the responsibility might not fall upon me to ask this country to accept the awful arbitrament of war. I fear that I may not be able to avoid that responsibility”, this shows that he has taken responsibility …show more content…
He achieved this through his utilization of logos and pathos. When Chamberlain said “If out of the struggle we again re-establish in the world the rules of good faith and the renunciation of force, why then even the sacrifices that will be entailed upon us will find their fullest justification”, he gives good moral reasons why the British must enter the conflict against the Nazi’s. He describes the Nazi’s again by using logos and pathos, saying, “As long as that Government exists and pursues the methods it has so persistently followed during the last two years, there will be no peace in Europe. We shall merely pass from one crisis to another, and see one country after another attacked by methods which have now become familiar to us in their sickening technique”. He explains that the effect of letting the German people do as they please is that Europe will be plunged into years of struggle, with violence and plagues of death being the toll. Chamberlain needed the emotional support of his citizens. He used pathos in this address to win their trust. He gains his audience back by using pathos and reminding them of grim times, such as World War One, it is still fresh in nearly every ones minds. Chamberlain says, “The thoughts of many of us must at this moment inevitably be turning back to 1914, and to a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Recenctly I read Franklin d. Roosevelt's FourFreedoms Speech. In the speech FDR talks about nazi germany and how they threaten our way of life and if we dont help fight for our four freedoms they will be taken awa. At the time Nazi Germany was Taking over and attacking countries in europe and killing ruthlessly. FDR wanted to awaken the sleeping giant, the American millitary, and he wanted to spur the us to support europe in the war. in this speech FDR uses facts and reality and doesnt use fantasy or anything fiction related.…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He also points out that his policy served to repair the damage caused by the Treaty of Versailles. Chamberlain further states: “Really I have no need to defend my visits to Germany last autumn, for what was the alternative? Nothing that we could have done, nothing that France could have done, or Russia could have done could possibly have saved Czecho-Slovakia from invasion and destruction.” There existed no other solution to German aggression against Czechoslovakia. With the Munich Agreement signed, Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. On the other hand, without an Agreement, it still would have been likely that Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. Thus, Chamberlain remains blameless for German aggression because the German Empire would have invaded Czechoslovakia in either case. After establishing his innocence, Chamberlain states the inevitability of war against the German Empire: “Does not the question inevitably arise in our minds, if it is so easy to discover good reasons for ignoring assurances so solemnly and so repeatedly given, what reliance can be placed upon any other assurances that come from the same source?” How can any of the European powers trust the German Empire after the Munich Agreement was so abruptly ripped up? Any further peace talks will not produce satisfying results because there will always be doubt regarding the German intent to expand its territory. Chamberlain…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, he used techniques to improve his speech as metaphors. And we can see examples of metaphors in the phrases “Nor have we neglected any means of making it crystal clear” “we shall stand at the bar of history of knowing that the responsibilities…” and many other metaphors. Firstly, he started his speech by saying descriptive positive words as “crystal clear” and then he continued using negative words to inspire the audience to war as “terrible catastrophe” “hesitated” “neglected” and many other words and phrases Neville used in the middle and at the end of the speech describing the cruelness of the Nazi government.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roosevelt begins his speech by stating the series of events Japan took and how those events affect the United states. When Roosevelt states "Yesterday, the Japanese government also launched an attack against Malaya. Last night... Midway Island. "(line 17-22) he shows the list of atrocities Japan has committed in one night.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One argument is the view that appeasement was the only realistic option because public opinion supported it and for Chamberlain to lead Britain to war would go against public favour. The First World War savaged Europe and Britain was hit very hard in terms of Human losses. Many families lost men within the family and left psychological scars nationwide. Chamberlain was therefore desperate to avoid another war on the continent at all costs. If Britain was to go to war they would have to rearm and build on their armed forces which had been neglected since world war one. However public opinion was that if Britain was rearming then they would be preparing for war, which was incredible unpopular. Evidence of this was in east Fulham by-election of 1933 the conservative who advocated rearmament turned a majority of 14,000 into a defeat by 5000 at the hands of his labour approach who supported disarmament. This illustrated the political affect that rearmament and policies that move towards War had which was a reason as to why Chamberlain saw appeasement as the only realistic option.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The erosion of Neville Chamberlain’s# reputation was brought about quickly as his policy of appeasement failed to prevent WW2. The Cato# collective branded him as a criminal in the ‘Guilty men’#. Churchill# further reinforced this view telling the commons “England has been offered a choice between war and shame. She has chosen shame, and will get war.”#. These more orthodox views starkly contrast the reactions of the public and media pre-war. Hailed as a hero “Most newspapers supported Chamberlain uncritically, and he received thousands of gifts, from a silver dinner service to many of his trademark umbrellas.”#, with newspapers such as the Stockholm Tidningen# suggesting he receive the Nobel peace prize, Strasbourg renaming her streets overnight and the Telegram# concluding "Your name will go down in history as a statesman who saved civilisation from destruction”#. Ultimately appeasement, “the reduction of tensions between two states by the methodical removal of the principal causes of conflict and disagreement between them, which might otherwise lead to war.”# may not have been the only realistic option, but it was certainly an option and it was taken forward. Used as a synonym for weakness and ‘giving in’ in today’s world, there are Historians who argue that Chamberlain and his policy of appeasement was weak and lead to WW2 such as L.B. Namier, while there are also historians, such as A.J.P Taylor, who argue it was the only realistic option for him, during the years 1936-38.…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Initially, Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King warmly supported British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasing German leader Adolf Hitler. When Chamberlain postponed war by sacrificing Czechoslovakia in the Munich crisis of September 1938, King thanked him publicly, and Canadians in general certainly agreed. Nevertheless, the shock of this crisis likely turned opinion towards accepting war to check the advance of Nazism. Only gradually did ongoing Nazi aggression alter this mood to the point where Canada was prepared to take part in another great war. King himself had no doubt that in a great war involving Britain, Canada could not stand aside.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Munich agreement encouraged Hitler to take more land and spread militarism. Neville Chamberlain should have stopped Hitler in his tracks, and gathered Allies to defend Poland, as well…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler's Speech Analysis

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Adolf Hitler entered Kroll Opera House on the first of September, 1939, as his troops prepared to invade Poland. Propaganda was a major facet of Nazi Germany’s success and this speech reiterates the plight of Germany, Hitler’s beliefs on who was to blame for their failing economy, and what must be done about the crisis. Like many of Hitler’s speeches, outside of those in physical attendance, nations all over the world had tuned in via radio where these speeches were translated in real time. This event was known as a Reichstag Extraordinary Session, a council meeting called upon by the President of the Reich or a majority of the council members. Beyond the live audience, English translations of the transcripts of this speech and others like it have been collected by Yale University through the Avalon Project. This primary source is a vital window into the beliefs of Hitler’s regime and its supporters, as well as evidence of the corruption and propaganda presented during World War II.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most effective speeches throughout history have all incorporated paralleling methods that have made them so successful. Techniques such as applying ethos, logos, pathos, keeping you speech simple, using anecdotes and appealing audiences are just some of the pivotal characteristics that make up a great dialogue. The speech I have chosen to analyze is Winston Churchill’s “Their Finest Hour.” This speech was given at a time when Europe was experiencing the atrocities of the second world war. The historical value in this speech is unfathomable, less than a month after the rise spirits, England engaged the Nazi’s head on which is now known as the battle of Britain . However, Britain continued to encounter intense bombings from the Nazi’s from…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When giving a speech a speaker must be able to connect with his audience, the speaker wants his/her speech to be easy to follow and easy to understand. It is for those specific reasons that speakers purposely put in lots of logos, pathos, and ethos into their speeches so that the audiences can connect emotionally, ethically, and intellectually with what they are talking about. A particular speech that uses many examples of pathos, logos, and ethos is The Great Arsenal of Democracy given by President Roosevelt on December 29, 1940. Throughout the speech President Roosevelt uses excessive amounts of pathos to connect with his people emotionally. He plays on their pride, fear, and the feelings of shame. He uses logos to express the facts and reasoning behind why the American people should help the British. The president knows that his people won’t go on blind faith; they need facts and reasoning to help the British. It is also because of the knowledge that the American won’t go blindly into war just to help, that he also puts lots of ethos into it to appeal to their ethical side. FDR wants the American people to see him as a strong leader who has a plan, as well as; the best interest for his people in mind. He is truthful and honest with them and lays down the line that if they don’t help the UK that America will be in even greater danger if the UK was to fall to the Nazis. It is for the safety of America that the president wants his people to feel emotionally, ethically, and intellectually unified with Great Britain so that by saving them they can save themselves from an even bigger threat down the road.…

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the day of January 17, 1961 Dwight D. Eisenhower gave his last speech as a president. He used the speech to say farewell to his years of being president and to encourage us to keep making America greater. America getting greater will at least keep peace, to foster progress in human achievement, enhance liberty, dignity, and integrity among people and among nations.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Orthodox view that Chamberlain’s policy was foolish and ill-informed came into the limelight during and immediately after the war started, as people could now see the failure of appeasement. From 1939-1960s criticism of appeasement became immense; historians argue that Chamberlain gave into Hitler’s demands far too easily and that he gave in out of fear and to avoid a war. Source A1 is from the book “Guilty Men” which refers to appeasement as "deliberate surrender of small nations in the face of Hitler's blatant bullying". Unlike Hitler, Chamberlain attempted to create peace from the very beginning, he said "We…

    • 5151 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor, in May 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson represented the United States with a speech at the graduation exercises. “Johnson’s agenda was based on his vision of what he called “the Great Society,” the name by which the agenda became popularly known.” The wealth of our nation should be used to raise the quality and advance American civilization, along with the elimination of poverty and racial injustice.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winston Churchill was perhaps one of the greatest public speakers in history. Although Churchill delivered many speeches, his speech on June 18TH, 1940 showed the most emotion and courage of any other he told. In this speech, he explained that the war in France is over and the war in Britain would begin. On May 10, 1940, Nazi Germany began a massive attack against Holland, Belgium, Luxemburg and France. Britain defended these countries. The Germans relied on an aggressive battle plan, utilizing modern communications, the allies including Britain still relied on hand delivered messages. As a result, the German Blitzkrieg caught the allies off guard. After a few weeks of battle, Hitler’s armies conquered Holland, Luxemburg and Belgium. France requested an armistice, Britain now stood alone and it was Churchill’s speech that led the British into victory. (“Winston Churchill-Biographical” Nobelprize)…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays