That said, the first premise, democratic Laws are made by the majority, does show weakness. It is true that a democracy is
That said, the first premise, democratic Laws are made by the majority, does show weakness. It is true that a democracy is
In the story, “The Stranger”, by Albert Camus, Meursault the protagonist, does not think like most people. When his neighbor Raymond questions his opinion on Salamano a dog beater and how he beats his dog, Meursault does not think much. Meursault says to raymond “no” (camus 28). Meursault is very neutral and does not really judge people. On the other hand, most people are like Raymond. Raymond said that, “Salamano's acts are pitiful” (Camus 27). The thing with Raymond though, Raymond beats women. It is ironic that Raymond is fine with beating women, but beating a dog is unrighteous. On another note, Camus the author might have put Salomano in the story to continue the pattern of showing how Meursault has no emotion. Another reason, Camus…
Simone de Beauvoir was born in Paris in 1908 to Georges de Beauvoir and Francoise Brasseur.1 Her father was raised in a rich family that drew him to the right on the political scale.1 He was a strong atheist and pushed this on Beauvoir and her sister.1 Her mother on the other hand was a devout Catholic, and that along with her weak and rather submissive personality (something that manifests itself in the fact that she grew up in a time before first wave feminism), polarized her and Beauvoir. Her father fed her intellectual side, providing her with abundant works of literature and encouraging her to read and write from an early age. Beauvoir was very religious as a kid, which was likely a result of…
1. What was de Tocqueville’s observation about the way democracy played itself out in America?…
Throughout writing Democracy in America Tocqueville kept the audience he is writing to, foremost in his mind. Tocqueville is addressing the French aristocracy and is introducing as well as explaining the benefits of a democracy within his book. As he wrote Tocqueville understood that the aristocracy in France would have most likely never even heard of life in a democracy, much less seen and experienced it. Since Tocqueville is trying to convince the upper class in France to like and eventually turn to this form of…
Baron de Montesquieu also touches on the definition of a democracy, drawing inspiration form the Roman structure, “the body of people is possessed of the supreme power.” In The Spirt of Laws he also touches on the fact that similarities to Roman punishments enlighten other governments similarities to that of Rome. John Locke also touches on this separation of powers labeling then differently in The Two Treaties of Civil Government labeling then as legislative, executive, and federative…
Tocqueville create a tone of sympathetic. In “A Letter to Countless de Tocqueville” he delineates for the reader an impartial observation of the suffering of Native Americans under The Indian Removal Act. The terrible trip across the South to the Indians new land left the Indians with mental and physical struggles. This journey killed thousands of Indians and their agonies didn’t go unremarked. Alexis de Tocqueville, a Frenchman, observed and recorded every aspect of the new nation and wrote a letter to his mother stating how he was shocked by what he saw.…
In The Lais of Marie de France, poet Marie de France illustrates many different kinds of love. The main themes being marriage and extramarital affairs. From reading the lais, Guigemar and Bisclavret, I believe that Marie has a traditional view of marriage. I can assume that Marie believes a marriage takes two to work. I also can assume that Marie believes that either partner can cause a marriage to fail. In her stories she does not put the blame of a failed marriage on just the husband or the wife, instead she creates different scenarios that causes the audience to recognize that it is not just one gender that possesses certain characteristics. She plays with what society would consider masculine or feminine by giving the characters opposite…
Since Alexis de Tocqueville was born shortly after the conclusion of the French Revolution, he escaped its physical brutality but not the religious aftershocks that followed. Tocqueville witnessed extremists overturning Christianity in favor of the Goddess of Reason, and he witnessed as the lack of religion drove French citizens to intellectual servitude. When he was granted permission to study the United States’ penal system, he took it as an opportunity to analyze the results of the democratic experiment. He ascertained that the point of departure, which formed the undertones of the Constitution, was determined with the arrival of the Pilgrims. The Pilgrims a high value placed on freedom and religion which meant that “from the beginning politics and religion were in accord” (Tocqueville 275).…
In chapter seven, Tocqueville primarily talks about the unlimited power of the omnipotence of the majority of America. The natural strengths of the majority rule are clearly elaborated by Tocqueville in two ways. First he asserts that “The very essence of democratic government consists in the absolute sovereignty of the majority” (p. 282). Meaning that the essence of democratic government has determined the inevitable fate of the superior power of majority rule in this country. On the other hand, this trend has been strengthened by the constitution of some major states in the United States. The legislature, which can be the most vulnerable governmental agency affected by the majority, is the best embodiment of the majority rule. It is due to the fact that the lawmakers are directly elected by the majority, besides, their term of service are incredibly short as compared with the great power they were…
A disadvantage of majority rule is the majority’s ability to vote against the interests and preferences of those in the minority without those groups or individuals being heard or involved in the discussion. Those in the minority may be disenfranchised and remove themselves from the decision-making process because they are aware they do not have the numbers to win or significantly impact the vote…
In the article that I read Philosopher Thomas Hobbes believed that people must surrender their freedom to a ruler. In the article, french philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau states that people should come together in societies and the solution was to form a social contract with general will or the common good.…
Tocqueville compared the American system of government to other forms of European governments. In the European governments, the people had no power, or say in how they wanted their government run. He praised the system of American government for its success, and held it as a role model for what European governments would eventually conform to. Despite the praise he gave the American government, Tocqueville had reservations. With great power comes great responsibility, and if the majority rules the American people, who ruled the majority? This is where the majority exceeding its limits comes into play. This affected the United States as the minority did not get a say in how they wanted their government to be run. He feared that all the virtues he honored would be endangered by the “tyranny of the majority”. The American Government was successful, but still contained flaws. Tocqueville believed that in order to keep the country from the “tyranny of the majority”, more power would need to be given to the minority to balance the power of the people and keep the majority from abusing their power.…
When citizens become faithless in the core principles of democracy, than that democracy will fail. The congress people have no role in enforcing their specific leaning on their thousands of constituents[Doc B]. It might be the case that legislators become overconfident in their abilities to be a free agent in terms of legislating. When legislators lose focus of the purpose of democracy, than America become more of an oligarch than it does a democracy. As JFK said, “[saying] f the people... would deny the obligation of a representative to be bound by every impulse of the electorate”[Doc A]. This is especially true in context in the context of a democracy. It becomes infinitely regressive for an elected official to disagree with the conclusion their constituents fall upon. This denies the autonomy of a whole population of concerned citizens to participate in the governmental system. The governmental system become corrupts when elected officials become the center of the political system. They say why not this change, then why agree with any other decision that the electorate has. This creates a dangerous system that would not be possible if the congress people were more directly tied to the decisions of the people who elected…
Tocqueville’s analysis and opinions are convincing. He made clear statements about what he noticed as an outside observational party. The justifications for his observations, however not easily deciphered, were that of a man who witnessed the unquenchable determination of the American culture first hand. Tocqueville also made reference to people who were living in areas of less prosperity, modernization and economic growth which gave his argument more justification from comparison.…
A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority, and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party. Hence it is, that democracies have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths."…