Preview

Alfieri Tells the Audience 'Justice Is Very Important Here'. How Does Arthur Miller Show the Importance of Justice in the Play?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
667 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alfieri Tells the Audience 'Justice Is Very Important Here'. How Does Arthur Miller Show the Importance of Justice in the Play?
Alfieri tells the audience ‘Justice is very important here.’ How does Arthur Miller show the importance of Justice in the play?

By stating in his opening speech of the play ‘Justice is very important here,’ Alfieri opens the audiences minds to relate justice back to all the events in the book that occur. Throughout the play Arthur Miller shows the importance of justice mainly through Eddie and Marco’s behavior, building up to Eddies tragic death.
Through Alfieri’s first speech, Miller allows the audience to acknowledge that in America they ‘settle for half.’ This is explaining the way that Eddie sees justice, but also how Marco, who is from Sicily, would see justice and these differences. This quotation is implying that whatever justice means to the Americans it means more to the Italians. This is foreshadowing the end of the play as it links to Marcos thirst for revenge on Eddie.
At the end of Act One, Miller subtly suggests the idea of justice through Marcos defensiveness over his brother and also Eddie’s actions towards Rodolfo. After Eddie hits Rodolfo the audience gets the feeling that he feels this is justice for Rodolfo leading Catherine away from the life Eddie wanted her to have. This is emphasised by Eddie’s use of the word ‘Danish’ to describe Rodolfo. By using this as a nickname Miller is trying to access the point that Eddie is trying to isolate Rodolfo from the Italian community and also their family. The true sense of justice in this scene however, comes from Marco who ‘raises the chair over his head’. This is a clear sense of warning implied by Marco, which is clearly registered by Eddie, ‘Eddies grin vanished.’ This, to Marco, is a feeling of justice coming to Eddie for trying to make either him of his brother feel like they don’t belong. While also foreshadowing what will happen at the end of Act 2.
Miller highlights justice as one of the most important things in Eddie’s life. However, he leads the audience to enquire whether Eddie’s desires

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A friend of eddie from junior year of high school by the name of Jose Dominguez who is now in the marines came home because he gets on leave. jose invites eddie to breakfast and Eddie sees Mr s truck across from where they were eating. Eddie explains to jose about what happened and they both walks out of the restaurant The sun was harsh and for a moment i couldn't see ( page 66) Jose explains and so jose tries to help eddie get the truck back . he ends up getting stabbed by three brown boys in green dickies eddie gets blamed for what happened to jose. Eddie is scared and now keeps his head up so he can see everything thing in case someone tries to come up to him and hurts…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Crucible, Authur Miller expressed the argument that individuals must stand in opposition to collective injustice. During the Red Scare people often accused others as communist, which started a huge debate on wether or not they were. Author Miller has created an argument showing what the Red Scare was but in a earlier time period. The which crafts often contributed to the Red Scare in many ways, one way it contributed to which craft was the way that during both of the times people were accused of these acts even if they were not part of it. In the Crucible it was seen that many people were in this predicament . During the time of the Red Scare, Authur Miller wrote this book to express what he thought of the Red Scare. If people would…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Mabo Film Techniques

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Netta and Eddie are both hard working people who make an effort to try and get things done and through their pride and determination they are able to accomplish great things. Eddie fights for the rights and pride of his people while Netta stands by his side as well as constantly supporting the children by looking after them and working to provide food for them. Eddie was a focused and determined man and we see this throughout the film, one part was when Netta asked Eddie “what if you don’t win”, Eddie replies “DON’T YOU DARE!.” Perkins purposely put this scene it to show the dedication and resilience Eddie Mabo had in order to gain justice for his people, however Eddie would not be able to accomplish such tasks if it wasn’t for the strength and provisional care that Netta had for his children. Therefore without Netta’s assistance with the children Eddie couldn’t have been able to successfully focus on winning the court case for the future of his…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller makes sure that the play is assembled so that the conclusion of the conflicts appear inevitable. He has written the play in a way that makes Eddie’s downfall obvious with the use of foreshadowing and other language techniques. Eddie’s opposition with impossible obstacles such as trying to overcome the fact that his niece has grown up and his inability to admit his inappropriate feelings for Catharine along with his extreme loathing towards Rodolpho and later on Marco all comes to the final act that doomed the character Eddie Carbone .…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The different acts in the play have different aspects of the story line that show Arthur Miller’s value of truth. Arthur Miller says that valuing truth is important because it creates an aspect of respect among everyone. Valuing truth was an important aspect of respect that Arthur Miller conveyed. Valuing truth is an important aspect to gain…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law and Eddie

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Eddie is a strong hero as he fights for Indigenous rights in lots of ways with Housing cop community schools, unions. When he decides to take Mabo case to the High Court he has to make some decision about his appeals. it as either about “it’s about Eddie Mabo’s land or either “If I don’t and then you take it to the High Court, it’s about all the blackfellas”.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the subject of Susan Abbotson’s “law in the works of Arthur Miller” she speaks: “In such a play as The Crucible, the main impetus is quite literally a trial, but we actually spend our time outside the courtroom to see more pointedly the unpleasant repercussions in a society that allows itself to be governed by laws that are clearly open to corruption in the pursuit of personal gain.” Particularly, her claim focuses on the judicial aspect of the town which can be taken advantage of by corrupt individuals in pursuit of personal gain. Namely, characters that encourage Abbotson’s claim in this matter are Abigail, and Mary Warren. Above all others, these characters utilize the laws open to corruption to their advantage.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While justice is meant to be administered with utmost fairness and equality Arthur Miller's play The Crucible demonstrates that this does not always prevail, and in many circumstances the forces of injustices are exposed. Those appointed to administer justice often misuse their power resulting in a lack of justice. In addition, Justice failed to protect the individuals of Salem and instead was blinded by their personal jealousies, vengeance, fear, and greed. Similarly, in the poem Justice Denied in…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allusions In The Crucible

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Act four, of Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible from 1953, he demonstrates that one must bend to the will of the court of Salem or follow their own moral guidelines. Miller uses dramatic dialogue, ethos and allegorical allusions, showing that the people in Salem have to make person choices to follow or abandon their morals. This act’s purpose is to show the mental strain on the characters in the play in order to show the difficulty of the decisions the characters must make. The implied ethical argument is that it is unjust to force someone to choose between saving their life and abandoning their moral values and keeping their moral values and losing their lives. While the diction and syntax are understandable, the concepts and ideas in…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strepsiades Unjust Speech

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Furthermore, the weaker speech is considered the unjust speech in the play because it opposes all the theories that the just speech has to say. Moreover, in addition to comparing the unjust and just speeches, the unjust says, “I’ll overturn them by speaking against them, / for I quite deny that Justice even exists” (Line 900-901). In contrast, the weaker speech will always argue against the stronger speech because of the opposing notions on each side.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Miller’s classic tragedy of the 1692 witch trials, “The Crucible”, uses its Salem setting as a microcosm of society under pressure. The frightening rise of hysteria, accusations and vengeance brings out the very best and worst in Miller’s characters. The message of the play is that communities contain both good and bad elements. This is most clearly manifested in the symbolism of the crucible itself, and the characterisations of John Proctor, and Thomas Putnam. The presence of good and bad in the community is represented through the symbol of the crucible.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible the audience is supplied with an array of varying characters. Arthur Miller effectively categorizes the characters of the play into two juxtaposing categories; the accusers, and the accused. The accusers are led by the antagonist of the play, Abigail Williams, whereas the accused are led by the protagonist of the play, John Proctor. The audience sympathizes with John Proctor not only because he has been falsely accused, but also because he is a representation of the human condition. In contrast, Miller causes the audience to despise the accusers in order to exemplify the injustice of McCarthyism.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An Inspector Calls

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The play presents the need to act responsible to one another. This is shown through language, the roles of the characters and the actions they make. This is what helps put the message across. The Inspector gives this advice to the Birling’s towards the end of the play for his final speech.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    play is set at a time when a womans place was in the kitchen and…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Are law and justice the same thing? Many believe the idea that if one disobeys the law, they must be brought to justice. However, this isn’t always the case. The fact that there is law permitting or forbidding an act that does not determine that it is right or wrong. While justice is meant to be administered with the utmost fairness and equality, Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible demonstrates that this does not always prevail.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays