Preview

All Is Fair in Love and War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2275 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
All Is Fair in Love and War
There’s a lot of bombing the bejeezus out of all sorts of people around these days and Webdiarists seem to be much keen on discussing it recently so I am grateful both to SWMBO and the Librarian at St Vincent’s College Potts Point for bringing to my attention AC Grayling’s Among the Dead Cities: Was the Allied Bombing of Civilians in WWII a Necessity or a Crime? Bloomsbury Publishing, London 2006.
Grayling is Professor of Philosophy at Birkbeck College, University of London and he raises some interesting points that I thought germane to a few recent debates on WD. Grayling of course is a philosopher while I am a legal philosopher so we differ from the outset however some of the questions he raises and analyses raise interesting points about warfare in general, air warfare in particular (including the use of tactical nuclear weapons) and moral culpability.

He writes very much from a British perspective, having grown up in post-war England but he analyses the attitude of Bomber Command to "area bombing" in Europe as against tactical bombing by the US 8th Air Force and the fire-bombing of Tokyo and the dropping of the atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

The pacifists amongst you will be sad to learn that he starts from the premise that the war, on the part of the allies, was a just war and that just war is permissible [pp 210-4] but comes to the conclusion that both area-bombing in Europe and the atomic attacks were immoral, disproportionate and unnecessary.

For reasons which will appear below, I differ but not without some disquiet.

His starting point [p10] (I said he was a philosopher) is:

I reported the assertion that ‘deliberately mounting military attacks on civilian populations, in order to cause terror and indiscriminate death among them, is a moral crime’. I then asked: Are there ever circumstances in which killing civilians in wartime is not a moral crime? Are there ever circumstances – desperate ones, circumstances of danger to which such

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this essay I will discuss the reasons for and against whether America was right to drop the two atomic bombs. These two bombs were unloaded on Hiroshima, 6th August 1945, and attempted to hit Nagasaki, 9th August 1945. America gave the two bombs code names, the one that was dropped on Hiroshima was called ‘Little Boy’. This bomb was made of uranium. The final death toll added up to 135,000. The nuclear bomb that fell on Nagasaki was called ‘Fat Man’. This bomb was made of plutonium. The final death toll was about 70,000. This was because the bomb had missed its allocated target and instead fell into a valley.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hiroshima and Night are two novels about one of the world’s most powerful and destructive wars. In Hiroshima, Hersey writes of the events that began on August 6, 1945. Hiroshima is told through the memories of six survivors: Miss Toshiko Sasaki, Dr. Masakazu Fujii, Mrs. Hatsuyo Nakamura, Father Wilhelm Kleinsorge, Dr. Terufumi Sasaki, and Reverend Kiyoshi Tanimoto, and Hersey makes sure to never let his readers forget their stories. Every one of those six people experiences their share of death, destruction, and dehumanization. Elie Wiesel contributes similar concepts in Night. But instead of other people putting forth their stories, Elie Wiesel shares his own war story by narrating his…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Fussell wrote an article called “Thank God for the Atom Bomb,” seemed to be about how only certain people would understand why it happened while others are still debating if it happened because we wanted something cruel to happen or because that was an alternative to something less painful. Fussell does not agree with what a combat soldier said about he bombing and stated his opinion, “The purpose of the bombs was not to “punish” people but to stop…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    McLaughlin, John J. “The Bomb Was Not Necessary.” History News Network (2010). Database. Web. 25 April 2014.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When talking about WW2 and Japan, something that comes to mind often is the atomic bomb. Some people say it was a good thing, as it ended one of the worst war in history. however, some say that it was wrong to drop a bomb of a country that was on the verge of surrender. Proof of this statement, this essay will tell you.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1945 began as a year of increasing tensions between countries as the war extended onto its sixth year. Military groups of the various countries involved were now beginning to seriously consider the conclusion of the war in terms of how the global ceasefire would be carried out and frankly, who would win. After the defeat of the Axis Powers in Europe, the focus had been turned towards the war in Asia and the Pacific Regions in which the Allied Forces of Great Britain, Australia and the USA were in conflict with the Axis power of Japan and her partners. Following the urge to end the war, the ‘Big Three’ made up of the three leaders of the major Allied Forces; Churchill, Stalin and Truman met for what is known as the Potsdam Conference to discuss ‘post-war world’ and as a result, the Potsdam Declaration was written giving the Japanese an opportunity to surrender or face “prompt and utter destruction”. Despite this opportunity, the Japanese chose to ignore the warning, thus, the US decided to administer the use of their newly developed nuclear weapons and drop the atomic bombs on Japan with both hope and belief that the Japanese would be forced to surrender and thus, ending the war on American terms. At the time, there was massive speculation surrounding the attack. However, the USA had entirely justifiable reasons behind the attack; therefore, they should have dropped the bombs on Japan. Firstly, Japan had been given the opportunity to surrender on peaceful terms but refused due to military being in control of the nation. Secondly, the only alternative was an invasion on Japan; however this action would not end lightly with predictions of huge casualties on the Americans’ part. Furthermore, the Japanese surrendered within a week of the dropping of the bombs proving the effectiveness of the USA’s actions.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ingpen, Robert and Philip Wilkinson. “Bombing of Pearl Harbour.” Encyclopeida of Events that Changed the World, 1991, the only volume, 224.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    history ww 2

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    R2-Arnold Tabbs ‘parents have been killed, his home devastated and his dog has just died’…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: /b><ol><li>Claypool, Jane (1984). Turning Points of World War II: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Toronto: Grolier, 1984.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hiroshima Research Paper

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On August 6th, 1945, the world was forever changed when the world’s first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan. The attack was made as an attempt to end World War 2, and it succeeded at a devastating price. John Hersey’s Hiroshima depicts six different accounts of victims of the bomb. The journalistic novel tells how each of the people began their day, how they survived the explosion, the response, and where they were 40 years later. Each account is different, and they all represent the various ways that the bomb hurt the people. These six individual catastrophes illustrate the horrible effects of atomic bombs and how the use of them should not be even considered by any empathetic human being.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Throughout history there have been many philosophers, psychologists, politicians, and historians who have studied warfare, the ethos…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On august 6th 1945, an atomic bomb named little bomb has been dropped on Hiroshima Japan, a blast which was over 6,000 degrees Celsius where over 70,000 people were killed instantly and over 20,000 killed because of the aftershocks and sickness. (Bbc.co.uk,2015) People’s eyes came out of their sockets, and peeled skin hung from their body. Their ashes left shadows on the wall and floors of Hiroshima. There were people who died in less than a second with quick and short death and other people jumped straight into dried up rivers looking for water. Humans no longer looking like humans. (Crimes of War, 2011) I strongly believe that this action was unjustified. There were even children who eye witnessed this event which have scarred their innocent childhood. In this essay I will examine a range of evidence to show my decision.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The nuclear bombings of Japan are a very controversial topic, and is highly discussed and researched by scholars and the general public. The nuclear bombings are not just a small part in military history, but a lesson in reality and the destruction possible of man to achieve their goals; these bombings have raised a whole host of ethical issues and concerns, which must be taken into consideration. There are many reasons why the actions taken by the United States and specifically President Truman to drop the A-Bomb on Hiroshima were absolutely unnecessary. On the other hand there is an abundant amount of weak justification as to why it was so imperative for the U.S. to distinguish the lives of sixty-six thousand civilians in the blink of an eye, and cause catastrophic destruction and disparity that would have a lasting effect for decades to come.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays