Preview

Although New England and the Chesapeake Region Were Both Settled Largely by People of English Origin, by 1700 the Regions Had Evolved Into Two Distinct Societies. Why Did This Difference Occur?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
688 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Although New England and the Chesapeake Region Were Both Settled Largely by People of English Origin, by 1700 the Regions Had Evolved Into Two Distinct Societies. Why Did This Difference Occur?
The first major cause of this differentiation lay in the very reasons for the founding of the two region's colonies. In 1607 the London Company of Virginia, a joint-stock company, had been formed to settle in the Virginia area a colony of Englishmen. But the Company wanted this colony solely for economic gain. As Document F, Capt Smith's history of Virginia, shows the first colonists spent their time searching for gold like the Spanish windfall instead of planting crops. As a result, half of the colony died and only Capt. Smith's assumption of dictatorial power and his use of draconian measures prevented the colony from collapsing completely.

In contrast to the mercenary nature of Virginia, New England was founded out of altruistic and religious reasons. The Separatists, and later the Puritans who arrived in 1630, came primarily so that they might practice their religion as they wished, free of royal interference. As John Winthrop wrote, the settlers saw their colony as a noble experiment, a "city upon a hill" which was being watched by the entire world. The settlement would be a Christian community in which all would labor together for the common good, and everybody would help his neighbor in every way. Clearly the two regions had very different outlooks in life.

Secondly, the colonies differed in the nature of the English settlers they attracted. As the ship's list of those bound for New England shows, entire families of men, women and children came over together. The men were primarily in their thirties and forties and were usually skilled in a profession or craft. On the other hand, as the Virginia ship's list shows, those bound for the colony were almost all young, single men in their teens and twenties who came for adventure and to find their fortunes. Very few women came, and those that did were all young and single with no children.

Next, the very different geography of the two regions influenced the economic activities of the people and greatly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Even though the Virginia and Massachusetts Bay colonies were the some of the oldest and most heavily populated of the English colonies, their differences in their economies, politics, religions and society set them apart. Some of the differences include the southern Virginia colony having a representative assembly, while Massachusetts Bay colony had a democratic assembly, and the main crop of Virginia being tobacco, while the Massachusetts economy revolved around lumbar, fishing and trade.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH DBQ sample

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both colonies, in setting themselves up, started to differ greatly as time went on the societies themselves started to go in opposite directions of each other. For example, in Virginia, the population was almost fully just single men who had no one to provide for and in return became highly unmotivated at doing their jobs (document B). At the other end though, in New England, the whole society was based off of families and circulated around life at home(document C). This made the gap between the two colonies even bigger as the Virginians, looking for women on their own, would often go and intermarry with the Indian women. Secondly, the climate and topography of each region was much different. The south, finding an easier time agriculturally due to nice weather and land, prospered and were able to become very successful in exporting big amounts of crops such as rice and tobacco. The north on the other hand was a lot more rocky and hilly and the weather was a lot more sporadic. This made it so that the North relied mainly on livestock and then crops more suited for harsher and colder temperatures such as pumpkins, corn, and apples. As it shows in Document D, Massachusetts made a covenant that bound them to believe in their God, to allot property convenient to all inhabitants and to share farmland against them. In the New England region, the community was much more communal than that of the Chesapeake…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This essay explains and shows the differences between the Virginia colony and the Massachusetts colony. People all over Europe started coming down to the “new world” (America), they came to the new world for many reasons such as land, food, religion and much more. Before I start to contrast between the 2 colonies I’m going to give a general background on them. Massachusetts was established in 1620 and Virginia was established in 1607. Virginia’s colony was Jamestown and Massachusetts was Salem and Boston.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the first two regions of America to be colonized, Virginia and Massachusetts had many similarities. However, their differences are what defined their society and economy and made them unique. Virginia and Massachusetts differ socially in terms of religion and demographics and economically in terms of production focus and labor usage.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Ne and Chesapeake

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Economy: New England consisted of skilled merchants who began to develop commercial business in the region. On the other hand, the Chesapeake was vast agricultural tobacco land, which was extremely spread out and was connected by the waters of the Chesapeake bay.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Settlers in New England and the Chesapeake area had contrasting views on religion which separated the colonies.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The demographics between these two colonies differentiated greatly at first, but transcended to an almost equal status through the years to follow. The majority of English colonists that voyaged to Virginia in the seventeenth century were single men in their twenties. They saw Virginia as a place where quick profits could be earned before returning to Great Britain. Few had any intention of staying more than a couple of years in Virginia. This is in contrast to the New England colonies. Here the communities were composed…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virginia and Massachusetts were the first two colonies settled by England in the New World. However, these colonies were very different from each other. Virginia’s economy, based heavily on slaves and other low-class workers, resulted in a very small, rich class having all influence and power. Massachusetts, in contrast, had an economy with a large middle class of “equals,” resulting in a more democratic government than that of Virginia. Overall, the first two English colonies in the Americas had extremely separate ways of creating economic and Economic development usually has a lasting influence on the political structure of any up-and-coming area. This certainly was the case for Virginia and Massachusetts. The Southern economy was based on the production of cash crops, predominantly tobacco, rice, and indigo. Crops were grown on large plantations that, by the mid 1600’s, had begun to use African slaves and lowly whites as the labor source. This meant that a lot of people worked for only a few people. Thus, the plantation owners tended to be wealthy, and they acted like it too. Many landowners hired a person in England to ship them goods that would fit the lifestyle. As a result, the South was cash poor, but the land and products owned had great potential value. The Massachusetts economy could not have been more different. Although the use of slaves and other servants did exist, it was miniscule compared to what was occurring in Virginia. Also, while plantation success depended on one system that could fail at any time, the Northern economy was more stable and diverse. In part because of the landscape, the Massachusetts colony was dependent on anything from shipbuilding, fishing, and whaling to farming, store-owning, and other types of artisan work. This allowed for a flexible economy with a large middle class that likely would survive if one market crashed. Meanwhile, if there had been a drought or drop in demand for tobacco, the whole Southern economy would have…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The foundations of the colonies were different. The New England colonies were founded because the founders wanted freedom of religion. The founders of these colonies were the Puritans. They came to this New World so they can build a society and win God’s favor not only economically but as wells as religiously. They wanted a government that would have God involved around it. Virginia in the other hand was one of the earliest settlements in the New World and was established by over 1,200 settlers. The Virginia colony was one of the first colonies to have elected legislature called the House of Burgesses. These people wanted to become economically wealthy.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summer Assignment

    • 1763 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Chapter 3: Compare and contrast the government, religion, geography, and economy of the three English colonial regions. Be sure to consider the role of race, gender, and ethnicity.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The events leading up to 1700 that occurred in the New England colonies and the Chesapeake colonies made both of these establishments vastly different. While both the New England and Chesapeake colonies can be separated by their culture, and government and religion, their motivations for colonizing was the most significant factor in differentiating the two.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New England colony from the founding had been a more democratic political background. Also there towns were set up in more of a way that our towns would be set up in the modern day. Compact with meeting places towards the middle of the town. Because it was, more compact and based on religion the farms were smaller therefore the New Englander’s didn’t have any use for slavery or indentured servants. While New England scaled better to more industry. While in the Chesapeake it was legislatively owned by the…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although New England and the Chesapeake region were both settled largely by the people of English origin, by 1700 the regions had evolved into two distinct societies. The reasons for this distinct development were mostly based on the type on people from England who chose to settle in the two areas, and on the manner in which the areas were settled. <br><br>New England was a refuge for religious separatists leaving England, while people who immigrated to the Chesapeake region had no religious motives. As a result, New England formed a much more religious society then the Chesapeake region. John Winthrop states that their goal was to form "a city upon a hill", which represented a "pure" community, where Christianity would be pursued in the most correct manner. Both the Pilgrims and the Puritans were very religious people. In both cases, the local government was controlled by the same people who controlled the church, and the bible was the basis for all laws and regulations. From the Article of Agreement, Springfield, Massachusetts it is clear that religion was the basis for general laws. It uses the phrase "being by God's providence engaged together to make a plantation", showing that everything was done in God's name. The Wage and Price Regulations in Connecticut is an example of common laws being justified by the bible. Also in this document the word "community " is emphasized, just as Winthrop emphasizes it saying: "we must be knit together in this work as one man". The immigrants to New England formed very family and religiously oriented communities. Looking at the emigrant lists of people bound for New England it is easy to observe that most people came in large families, and large families support the community atmosphere. There were many children among the emigrants, and those children were taught religion from their early childhood, and therefore grew up loyal to the church, and easily controllable by the same. Any deviants from the regime were silenced or…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The motives for moving to the New World behind the two colonial areas helped shape the differences between the Chesapeake and New England societies. Many of the ships going to the Chesapeake region in the 1600’s consisted of single people, mostly men, in search for wealth, gold, and a better life in the New World. At least one third of the freemen in Virginia in 1673 were single freemen (Doc. G). With the residents of the Chesapeake being mainly single men at this time, it only made sense that their motive behind moving to the New World was to find wealth. They had no responsibilities other than themselves; therefore, the want for wealth would be appealing more so to single men causing the Chesapeake colonies to be a majority of this group of people. On the contrary, most people who migrated to New England did so as a way to find religious freedom. This meant that New England colonies would be inhabited mainly by families and couples who held their religion high as a priority. On a ship’s list of emigrants bound for New England in 1635,…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    New England Vs Chesapeake

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As previously stated, the New England colonies were mostly settled by families while the Chesapeake region was mostly settled by single, young men. This lead to the New England colonies having close settlements and more of a small town atmosphere for the children in the colony. A list of emigrants bound for New England, from 1635, shows that one of the youngest members heading for the New World was Nathaniel Bernard, who was one year old, Musachiell Bernard son (doc b). The list also showed there were seven families headed to the New World (doc b). The strong presence of family life created a sense of security. The town was focused on keeping the families together and making sure they were all unified. In an Articles of Agreement written in Massachusetts in 1636, the author says, “ We intend that our town will be composed of forty families,...rich and poor.” (doc d) The towns wanted the people to live together and help each other. Unlike the New England, the Chesapeake region consisted of mostly single men. The list of emigrants headed to Virginia in 1635 consisted of 64 men and only 11 women. The youngest being 14 year old James Whithedd (doc c). With more his lead to an every man for himself atmosphere. The men of the Chesapeake region disperse when they reached the New World. They would create a new life for themselves and gain their own wealth. Overall New England colonies were settled by families who were…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays