Preview

America's Intervention In World War I

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1401 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
America's Intervention In World War I
The world broke out into a massive conflict, which had 32 countries pitted against each other. The two sides of the war were the Allies and Central powers. America’s involvement in the war came much later than the rest of their allies like Great Britain. The reasons that America entered the First World War were due to specific events like German submarine attacks on the Lusitania and Sussex. Another event that sparked America’s intervention in the First World War was the interception of the Zimmermann Telegraph. Examining these reasons, along with the long-term trends and immediate effects of America’s intervention based on looking at how the military operated and how the country supported the war effort. [sentence fragment]
America enters
…show more content…
“Soon after the fighting began, Woodrow Wilson told Americans that this was a European war; neither side was threatening a vital American interest. The United States would therefore proclaim its neutrality and maintain normal relations with both sides while seeking to secure peace,” (Murrin, 2012). At first, the majority of American citizens were happy with the decision, but he also encountered opposition from people like Theodore Roosevelt, who thought it was important that America enter the war on the Entente side and check Germany’s power and expansionism. I found this interesting because not long before World War I broke out, America pushed and expanded its land across the plains and forcibly take land from Mexico and the Native Americans. However, Wilson’s plans and attempts at peace kept the United States out of the war for three years and only saw small effects due to the …show more content…
However, the U.S. Army was less tactical and strategic sound as their allies and even less than the German army. Some of the limiting factors that affected the army’s performance was limited transportation and bad roads, which hampered the American Expeditionary Forces, their tactics, and the lack of knowledge by young officers, (Doughboy Center). In the Shortcomings of the AEF’s Tactical Doctrine, the U.S. 1st Army received negative reports from both the German General Staff and the AEF General Headquarters. The German General Staff said the U.S. officers did not understand how to make use of the terrain and instead of seeking protection when facing the enemy, they fell back. They also said that instead of crawling out of danger, they simply fell to the ground, waited, then stood up and tried to advance forward, (Doughboy Center). Not only did the German General Staff say that the enlisted and officer infantry personnel not know what they were doing during combat, but also criticized higher headquarters saying that they didn’t know how to grasp a new situation and exploit it. What the German General Staff was saying, is that the U.S. Army all throughout the ranks had no tactical knowledge of how to wage war and defeat their enemy. This lack of knowledge is detrimental when in a massive war

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first problem was that the Germans had established their positions first and had made deep trenches out of steel and concrete. The Allied intelligence had under estimated the German defences. They were 30 feet wide and had shell proof underground bunkers. The Germans had also placed their trenches in the best land which was the ridges so it was even harder for the Allied infantry to get to them.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cracks were developing in the plan and weaknesses were showing. Various issues of miscommunication, in some cases intensified by the battle, led to bad tactical engagements. Sturmtruppen were good at their job and could sometimes outrun the covering artillery leaving them too far forward for resupplying, but too far back to safely attack the enemy. Other times, the artillery would push to fast leaving the Sturmtruppen uncovered surrounded by enemies.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tet Offensive Research Paper

    • 2421 Words
    • 10 Pages

    There are a number of battles the United States has participated in over the past years. Of the many battles, the United States military branches won in a decisive manner. However, there is one particular battle that comes to mind in which the United States military as a whole failed to utilize the intelligence that was provided to ward off a surprise attack. The battle that comes to mind is the Tet Offensive. This battle took place in Vietnam in January 1968 between North Vietnam and the Viet Cong, against the allied forces of South Vietnam and the United States. This passage will explain that if the United States’ and South Vietnamese’s military commanders acted upon the intelligence that was received prior to the lunar New Year’s holiday,…

    • 2421 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The element of surprise was needed. To keep the Allies from detecting their plans the Germans used a clever variety of deceptive tactics including a flurry of fake radio messages sent to non-existing frontline command posts, false rumors spread in public places for anyone to overhear, and relied primarily on secretive face-to-face conversations to relay the actual battle plans. At the same time, three whole armies, including twelve Panzer tank divisions, were quietly rolled into position for the offensive using a fragmentary approach to avoid detection. Along with the element of surprise, the Germans needed to sow confusion to succeed. Here one of the more interesting exploits of the war unfolded, the brain child of Hitler himself. A special "School for Americans" was set up by SS spy master Otto Skorzeny to train 2,000 German commandos to speak and behave like American soldiers. Using captured uniforms and Jeeps, the commandos intended to confuse U.S. troops in the zone of attack by giving bad directions, mixing up road signs, killing dispatch riders, cutting phone wires, and would try to generate panic by depicting a hopeless situation to anyone who would listen. The offensive began December 16,…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allied military strategy in WW II had changed since the battles of WW I and faced new challenges that required coordination and cooperation on levels never seen before. This paper will discuss identifying the strategic problems, differences in the types of strategy to employ, cohesion between land, sea, and now airpower, and how those decisions were accomplished.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Factors Of METT-T

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page

    Troop – US 82nd Division was fresh compared with the German 2nd Wurttemberg Landwehr Division that were fighting since 1914. The picture at the top right illustrates camouflaged…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These forces managed to breach the enemy defenses and allowed the divisions of armed tanks to penetrate quickly and have free passage behind the enemy lines. This caused commotion and disorganization between those defenses. The air power of Germany did not allow…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lions led by Donkeys

    • 1854 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people say that the generals did not understand what it was like on the battle field. They say that they led a comfortable lifestyle miles from the front line.…

    • 1854 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Doughty, Robert A. The Evolution of U.S. Army Tactical Doctrine, 1946-76. Leavenworth Papers No. 1. Ft. Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College.…

    • 3345 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corregidor Mission Command

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    At the task force level Col Jones made the decision to cancel the third drop and bring the battalion in by the sea. His chain of command concurred with this assessment from the man on the ground and supported the decision fully. At battalion-level and below, units had freedom of action to introduce new techniques and tactics. The innovation of abandoning positions to Japanese at night is one good example of this. This innovation, which ran counter to accepted practice of holding seized terrain, allowed for the relatively easy elimination of the enemy once morning…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    General Von Seeckt immediately placed the collective mental capacity of one tenth of the total officer strength to work answering the question of why did the First World War turn into a stalemate ultimately leading to the defeat of the German military? Although interested in what occurred, General Von Seeckt directed an impartial and systematic approach to finding out why events occurred. He guided their collective efforts in determining areas where new tactics and technology were successfully implemented, and issues still needing addressing. By 1923, this concerted effort produced doctrine that emphasized offensive maneuver, decentralized operations, and leadership and…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This tactic was highly unsuited for the war for several reasons, one of them being that the…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the german troop was just ready to give up as there were many adjustments to the plan. He said that not most of it went on how they…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequently, too few of soldiers were deployed over too broad of a front during the campaign and…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    France's Downfall

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While we could sit here and talk about how the French were planning to fight a WW1 styled war again, it can also be said that both the axis and allies knew to some degree that the war was going to be on a whole new level. Tanks and airplanes are what made that rightfully clear. That brings the aspect of military training into effect. The Germans can be rightfully attributed to being better accustomed to these new situations of war, because their military was trained under the emphasis of improvisation. As we saw in the Battle of France, the Germans were able to proceed much quicker than they should have in accordance with the old rules of the game. The French stuck to their belief that it wasn’t possible for any military force to be able to advance their movement on a large scale once a front was firmly positioned. That is why the French assumed that German forces would have to attack through the Northern plains of Belgium. Germany being able to not only improvise but also be initiative, sent their forces to the north as a decoy to fool the French in their movement through the South in the Ardennes forest. This was clear improvising as the original battle plans were captured off of a German officer that had their projected attack going through North Belgium. So when we look at the French on the other hand,…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays