Preview

Amphibian Man Transformation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
770 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Amphibian Man Transformation
Science fiction allows society an outlet to imagine world’s more fantastical than will ever be possible on our own planet. This includes fantastical notions of what humans can someday be and if it is ethical for humans to strive to be better by using science to better themselves. In the novel, The Genome, the film, Amphibian Man and the play, Professor Dowell’s Head, the ramifications of scientific modification is explored, illustrating that while science is beneficial to society it is not always for the good of the individual.
The Genome explores many scientific modifications, in this futuristic novel, as well as how harmful these modifications can be. These consequences can be looked at both on a greater scale and a more personal view. The
…show more content…
Ichthyander has been modified to be able to breath underwater for limited amounts of time. He falls in love with a pearl fisher’s daughter and his problems stem from this. After falling in love Ichthyander realizes how unhappy, and isolated he is. He daydreams of being able to swim with his love, which shows he not only yearns for her, but he yearns to not be the only one with his modification. His father, by giving him the ability to breathe underwater, unknowingly secluded his son away from ever having normal human connections. Additionally, a rich pearl fisher exploits Ichthyander for his ability, since he is the only one with his abilities. Since Ichthyander is viewed as the other by the pearl fishers, the exploitation can be justified. This exploitation just results in further dehumanization of him and further removes him from …show more content…
In Professor Dowell’s Head, Professor Dowell is turned into an experiment by his own partner, Kern, and only lives as a head at the complete will of those around him. After his modification, Dowell has lost complete agency over himself and his actions and is forced to live on to assist his murderer in completing the science he had commenced. This modification is perilous to humans because it takes away all freedom. Without freedom, Professor Dowell ceases to be a human and only serves to be a head, only good for the experiment Kern is carrying out. As well, Kern has no care for the people that these heads belong to. When one of the secondary heads dies, he does not worry much or is even concerned over who that person was. This modification dehumanizes the person and allows their sense of agency to be robbed from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Progress, which can be defined as making the world increasingly better, is a fundamental element of Garrett’s argument. She explains that synthetic genomic research marks the beginning of tapping biology’s full potential. The beginning of a biology revolution, bioengineering research mimics revolutions in physics that allow for clean energy and other advancements. But one cannot discount that progress in physics also led to the atomic bomb, and bioengineering’s atomic bomb could be an epidemiological catastrophe. If the government mitigates negative effects like this through the regulations that Garrett suggests, it is possible that bioengineering research could be a prime example of progress, making the world astoundingly better through tailored vaccinations and…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When two texts that stem from the same universal themes but different contexts are compared we gain a sophisticated understanding of the values being presented. The time the text was created shapes the meaning, values and significance of the text and shapes the ways in which they are received. Scientific advancement and environmental concern are common themes evident in both texts that are presented differently due to the historical context in which they we created, ultimately strengthening the responders understanding of the meaning and values presented. Mary Shelley’s novel “Frankenstein” and Ridley Scott’s Film “Bladerunner - The Director’s Cut” both successfully address the repercussions of scientific progression without a consideration for its effect on society and the environment.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    manolo vs louboutin

    • 695 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The New York Times put Manolo Blahnik on the cover of their weekend style section, declaring the return of the comfortable, ladylike pump. On the same day, the Times UK profiled Christian Louboutin, who basically says that women are thrilled to wear debilitating shoes—as long as they look great.…

    • 695 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the contextual disparity, both Mary Shelley’s nineteenth century novel “Frankenstein” and Ridley Scott’s 1982 post-world film “Blade Runner” reflect parallel values associated with the dangers of ambition. Specifically, both texts highlight the consequences of man’s lack of morality and humanity due to their blind ambitions and man’s eagerness to play the role of God in a quest for power. Additionally, both texts explore concepts related to the dangerous nature of knowledge and unrestricted scientific advancements.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specter And Gawande

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If the people who purchase and read The New Yorker were truly uninterested by articles that do not contain the presence of an individual, the editors and the executives of the company would not have published Gawande’s essay in it 88 years after the first issue debuted. The final topic both Specter and Gawande touch upon is public policy. Specter writes about public policies which do not exist yet but are on the verge of existing. As CRISPR becomes more precise, human testing is becoming a reality and with this reality comes policies that need to be enacted to ensure the safety of society. Whereas Gawande is questioning why indivuals don’t follow public policies enacted to ensure the safety of society. Even with public policies, society cannot be deemed safe from dangers associated with gene rewriting unless every person follows the them. Researchers and law makers must first know why people do not follow policies to ensure they are creating policies that will be follow. Specter and Gawande speak to each topic, science, journalism and public policy in their own way but each is also interconnected by the fact that they both share the…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific experiments are performed as a way for humans to understand more about the world in which they live and themselves. However, the thirst for such knowledge has often resulted in ignoring the ethical implications of such experiments and thus has resulted in some of the worst human rights violations. In 1973 the Senate Subcommittee on Health held a series of hearings in an attempt to tackle the conundrum of risk versus reward in medicine and human experimentation. Much knowledge has been reaped from these experiments that have resulted in medicine being able to improve the quality and lifespan of many people’s lives. However, a lot of this knowledge has been gained through the sacrifices of others and sometimes these sacrifices were not made willingly. Thirty years later, Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go attempts to tackle the same conundrum by posing a question to readers that all experimenters…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Brave New World the author demonstrates how science is used and abused. In the story they found a way to artificially create life and train a cast system upon toddlers. Brave New World has many different plots. Mr. Foster says “The lower the caste the shorter the oxygen” that is cruelty that some are born into which is unfair.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “As science is more and more subject to grave misuse as well as to use for human benefit…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With the development of genetic modification scientists have created a chicken that has a dinosaur leg in a reverse evolution experiment, a goat that produces spider silk, featherless chicken, glow in the dark cats, sheep and monkeys and recently in February 2016 British scientists were granted permission to genetically modify human embryos. Just as Etienne Geoffroy St. Hilaire and his son Isidore Geoffroy St. Hilaire created malformations in chicken embryos, scientists in the 21st century are creating malformations in animals in the name of science – for “the good” of human beings. Wherever a person situates themselves in time, whether it is in the 18th century or 21st century, people need to understand that there will always be consequences for what we choose to do with the knowledge we gain. Knowledge can create and knowledge can destroy- both in the physical realm and in the moral realm. Morally speaking, knowledge can change how individuals (and collectively human beings) view themselves in the world and how individuals view other animals and material things in the…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley tells a ghastly narrative of horrendous ramifications when man exceeds the boundaries of life, and manipulates nature itself. The young scientist plays God while learning the consequences of creating life, and the potential of permanent damage it can conflict on others. Mary Shelley, in her young adulthood, challenges both society and the individual to ponder the eternal question of whether being able to do something gives us the right to do it. Just because we have the potential to break science, and play the role of God; Should the consequences of endangering the world or society be worth it?…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Macer, Darryl R.J., Ph.D. "Ethical Challenges as we approach the end of the Human Genome Project." N.p: n.p. 2000…

    • 1585 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ability for a scientist to create is powerful, and should be considered seriously, with a drive to create for the overall benefit for the public and not for business, fame, or own desire. From a young age Frankenstein took interest in re-animating life, even though his professors discouraged it, but his drive for re-animating life was supposedly to be for the good of the public because he wanted to be able to “ ...[discover] if [he] could banish disease from the frame and render man invulnerable to any but a violent death…”(26), but unfortunately Frankenstein was not able to understand the danger of the “astonishing power placed within [his] hands”(37), because he was also driven by the greed for “wealth” and “glory”, and ultimately abandons his creation because it turns out to be monstrous instead of “beautiful”. Moreover, in today’s society, scientists develop discoveries in a…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Towards the end of the Renaissance era in Europe, a sensation we now call the Scientific Revolution initiated and continued into the late 18th century. This revolution brought about the ultimate thinkers and inventors of our time, and some of the paramount scientific discoveries such as the microscope. Our world of scientific knowledge continues to develop across new horizons, and we have transitioned to impressive areas of study like cloning sheep, and even space exploration. The new discoveries being made are so exciting and surreal; one could say it was science-fiction. Amidst all of the wonder in scientific discovery, it is easy to forget the question: What are the ethical implications of these discoveries? Through Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the reader discovers the ethical and moral concerns surrounding the creation of a human being by means of Victor Frankenstein’s naivety, his lack of responsibility, and through the feelings illustrated by his creation. Although dramatic, Shelley’s arguments in Frankenstein show that our society should question the boundaries of science.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weston Meehan

    • 3393 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Before the Evolutionary theory’s inception the four burning questions of man has been who am I, where did I come from, why am I here, and where do I go when I die? The answer to these questions has always been some sort of religion, and that this world has a designer with an incredible plan. Now as time has progressed a very dangerous solution was introduced to the world and with its arrival it is changing the very fabric of humanity. The new religion of the day is science and this affects our legal system, school system, and thought process. These effects over time can be detrimental to the minds and morals of us as a society.…

    • 3393 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causal

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Science has helped improve many people’s lifestyle from eating a healthy diet to stopping different form of disease that are attacking the human body. Science also provides intolerable lifestyle to people such as the elders as when the elderly have an incurable disease and the elderly are suffering for this incurable disease and wants to die, but cannot due to science advancement in technology making impossible to die at that moment. The possible future of science is uncontrollable. The power of science provides possibility and with this possibility doesn’t always generate a good possibility. Jeremy Rifkin in "Biotech Century" and Michael Bishop in "Enemies of Promise" talks about the science as their argument in a casual sense of manner. The fear of the unknowingness of what science can provided for future can be argued in a causal manner with Rifkin and Bishop.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays