Analysis of Jared Diamond's The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race
The Greatest Argumentative Essay in the History of My Life
It’s actually rather mediocre.
Ask anyone in almost any country around our modern world what they think the core of their nation is and chances are they will say the farmers. The people that work year round to feed their people so others can pursue different jobs in order turn the gears of their countries machine. However, some people refute that claim in favor of our old human way of hunting and gathering, claiming that that the negative effects on the human race by agriculture is so numerous compared to the positive that its advent was a complete mistake. One of those people is Jared Diamond PhD. of UCLA. In his paper The Worst Mistake in the History of the
Human Race, he describes how the adoption of agriculture created a society that is malnutritioned, growth stunted, has brevity of life and a number of other things; he says that an alternative society with hunting and gathering would have a much improved quality of life.
Though it is no doubt that today’s practice of farming has advantages as well, such as being able to keep stockpiles of food in case of emergency and having it all ready for purchase in one central store. Overall, both parties have very good points, but Diamond and the others that agree with him are still wrong; while hunting and gathering offers a more nutritional diet and smaller stable population, agriculture allows us to have more time to work in a career, not having to dedicate time to find food, and preventing the extinction of game animals.
Diamond’s main argument is that quality of life as effectively went down after the invention of farming, because of it mankind has payed the price. The world’s three highest cash crops are potatoes, corn, and rice, trading in a wholesome nutrition for a high energy.
The effects of this kind of diet on early civilizations led to them being malnutritioned, with lasting side effects pertaining to skeletal health,
It’s actually rather mediocre.
Ask anyone in almost any country around our modern world what they think the core of their nation is and chances are they will say the farmers. The people that work year round to feed their people so others can pursue different jobs in order turn the gears of their countries machine. However, some people refute that claim in favor of our old human way of hunting and gathering, claiming that that the negative effects on the human race by agriculture is so numerous compared to the positive that its advent was a complete mistake. One of those people is Jared Diamond PhD. of UCLA. In his paper The Worst Mistake in the History of the
Human Race, he describes how the adoption of agriculture created a society that is malnutritioned, growth stunted, has brevity of life and a number of other things; he says that an alternative society with hunting and gathering would have a much improved quality of life.
Though it is no doubt that today’s practice of farming has advantages as well, such as being able to keep stockpiles of food in case of emergency and having it all ready for purchase in one central store. Overall, both parties have very good points, but Diamond and the others that agree with him are still wrong; while hunting and gathering offers a more nutritional diet and smaller stable population, agriculture allows us to have more time to work in a career, not having to dedicate time to find food, and preventing the extinction of game animals.
Diamond’s main argument is that quality of life as effectively went down after the invention of farming, because of it mankind has payed the price. The world’s three highest cash crops are potatoes, corn, and rice, trading in a wholesome nutrition for a high energy.
The effects of this kind of diet on early civilizations led to them being malnutritioned, with lasting side effects pertaining to skeletal health,