Preview

Analysis Of Machiavelli's Obligations '

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
547 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Machiavelli's Obligations '
In the sixteenth century, Machiavelli famously argued that it is better for rulers to be feared than loved. Furthermore, Machiavelli believes that Contrary to Machiavelli’s beliefs are those of Cicero and Seneca. For one, Cicero bases his justice of ruling on the four virtues: wisdom, justice, beneficence and temperance. Based on these four virtues, if rulers follow them, it would lead to more positive reinforcement from their people. For Seneca, mercy is key to showing and affirming power in leaders. Seneca argues that being able to have mercy on someone is a sign of strength for in any relationship, only the superior one has such power to give mercy. Lastly, Machiavelli believes that it is better to be feared than loved. This is based on the premise that using mercy is a sign of weakness and any means …show more content…
Not only that, but being feared and effectively keeping up with one’s appearance can change circumstances drastically in terms of leading and guiding a group of people. Therefore, being feared is better than being loved on the condition that being virtuous and showing mercy is a sign of weakness and costly method of leading whereas using fear and force with an appearance overcomes any obstacles that may stand in its way for leaders to guide their people.
According to Cicero’s On Obligations, every aspect of life requires obligation. Obligation is aimed towards goodness and a moral guidance that shapes our lives. Furthermore, to do so we are guided by four cardinal virtues: wisdom and prudence, justice, beneficence, and temperance. Wisdom is the search for truth to promote happiness and useful knowledge. This should also not divert us from our service to the community (Cicero 2000, 13). Justice has two principles: no one should harm another and communal and private interests should both be maintained (Cicero 2000, 17). Justice is founded on good faith and contrary to justice is injustice. There are two forms of injustice:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s most famous book, he writes to prospective “new princes” on how to be as successful as possible, without taking into account the morality of any of the actions. For example, in chapter 15, he writes that “it is necessary for a prince, if he wishes to maintain himself, to learn to be able to not be good, and to use it and not use it according to necessity” (Machiavelli 93). In addition, he also believed that men were generally to receive misfortune as they “[were generally] ungrateful, fickle, hypocrites, and dissemblers, evaders of danger, lovers of gain” (Machiavelli 101). He believed that during good times, man would likely seek to be friends with fellow neighbors but that in times of adversity, they would only seek out their own well being and be selfless even if one had previously given them a favor. For this reason, he supports the fact that a prince is better off being feared than loved showing pessimism in the nature of humans. He writes, “Love endures by a bond which men, being scoundrels, may break whenever it serves their advantage to do so; but fear is supported by the dread of pain, which is ever present” (Machiavelli 106). Machiavelli supported keeping people in fear to better control them.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Petrarch and Machiavelli

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the fourteenth century, the humanist philosopher Francesco Petrarch wrote a letter entitled How a Ruler Ought to Govern His Sate. Nearly a century later, another philosopher by the name of Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a book about governing, The Prince. The two documents show many similarities in content and theme. While the two wrote in similar subject matter, it is clear that these philosophers possess distinctly different viewpoints on how a ruler should govern. In Petrarch’s How a Ruler Ought to Govern His Sate and Machiavelli’s The Prince, both philosophers possess different opinions on how a ruler ought to govern. In particular Machiavelli pays specific attention to the importance of appearing like a good ruler. There is much evidence to support this in the readings.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli insists that a ruler must do whatever is in his power to rule his people regardless of whether his actions are moral or immoral and that "...it is safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking....For one can generally say this about men: that they are ungrateful, fickle, simulators and deceivers, avoiders of danger, greedy for gain, and while you work for their good they are completely yours, offering you their blood, their property, their lives, and their sons..." (Jacobus 44). These comments support…

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Machiavelli and Odysseus

    • 4351 Words
    • 18 Pages

    This book studies the lessons of Machiavelli on leadership and how they can be applied to modern politics. Michael A. Ledeen’s personal view on the importance of Machiavellian leadership will be used as a tool to back up my claims on why the consequences that Odysseus suffered throughout his journey were the results of his leadership decisions that contradicted the guidelines of Machiavelli. In one case in the book that indicates the importance of inserting fear in the people under one’s leadership, Leeden uses George Washington as an example by illustrating how the former U.S. president used his army to control the citizens who were against the idea of paying excise tax on their liquor.…

    • 4351 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout The Prince, Machiavelli outlines the characteristics needed to be a strong and admirable leader. He explains that personal characteristics such as courage and compassion, both being aspects of virtue, will earn him praise. However, he feels that this expectation is unrealistic and a prince’s first job is to protect the state, and having “bad” characteristics is sometimes necessary to reach that goal. That being said, in order to protect the state a prince may have to act unscrupulously at times which he believes will bring good fortune in the long run. Machiavelli believes that no matter how a prince acts, whether moral or not, virtue and fortune are the two most influential forces in politics and he shows how, throughout history, they have affected different people in powerful positions. Using the lessons learned by previous people of great political power, Machiavelli points out virtues and fortunes present in the particular cases, while then explaining his beliefs and solutions to the examples from the past. Virtue and fortune go hand in hand throughout this guide. One…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Best Paper Evvver

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages

    2) Another is that it is better for a prince to be feared then hated or loved.…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justice may be the most difficult trait for a virtuous man to embody as it causes one to do the right thing, which is usually not the easiest to do. Knowing the difference between right and wrong, and then applying it to one’s life is extremely…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To explain this concept and convince Medici, Machiavelli used historical people including Caesar, Cyrus, Alexander and Hannibal. Machiavelli suggests that the people of a state should not be any concern to a prince if the state is in danger of rebellion. This view of how a prince should govern, is often considered unethical and cruel. The people of a state should always be treated fairly and should not have to fear their…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lead with Example

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stability in a ruler’s morals and ethics are a vital asset to have when ruling a group of people. With similarities shared between the ruler and the common person the ruler will then be able to relate and be more respected amongst the population, as opposed to a ruler who rules with his own self interest at hand. In the piece, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli argues the many principles of how a prince should and should not rule. In order to rule successfully he states a prince must possess some of the following characteristics; morality, a strong army, strict rule, common ground with his people and also to be widely respected. Machiavelli laid the ground work for many rulers in the future with his modern view in a time where rulers were primitive and ruled through fear and terror. The Prince and its ideas can even be seen today in our modern day presidents and kings proving that Machiavelli had compelling ideas and arguments for how leaders can obtain and hold a position of power successfully.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He must, however, take care not to misuse this mercifulness” (679). Machiavelli believes that humans are greedy and will do anything if we get something in return. This is why he believes that we must be ruled by fear otherwise we will get too greedy and try to take what is not ours. In “Freedom of Fear” Kyi explains that if humans are overcome by fear they will become corrupt.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A vital component of Machiavelli's system of morality is that it is necessary for a ruler to occasionally “make exception to being good” (Machiavelli, 55). This means that sometimes a ruler must take on certain actions that are not necessarily considered “good” in order to maintain and extend his power. Despite occasionally making exceptions to being good it is still crucial for a ruler to be viewed as virtuous to his people. The ruler does not necessarily have to actually act virtuously to be viewed as virtuous. In fact, acting virtuously for the sake of virtue and not power can prove as detrimental to the principality.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A leader can give, but must not be known for giving. Other personality traits were also covered by Machiavelli, like love and fear. “A controversy has arisen about this: whether it is better to be loved than feared, or vice versa.” This controversy is responsible the cynical view of Machiavelli. He states, “My view is that it is desirable to be both loved and feared; but it is difficult to achieve both and, if one of them has to be lacking, it is much safer to be feared than loved.”…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli was an out of the ordinary man. What he saw was conveyed through his innumerable works, and irrespective of all the criticism he managed to gather, Machiavelli pinpointed the reality of a political environment. Though initially being associated with pejorative meanings, Machiavellianism has started to become a major topic of discussion between modernist intellectuals. Who he really was is still perhaps a mystery, but the fact that what he provided in his works on sustaining authority and command has effectively percolated into modern politics, cannot be easily disregarded.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays