Preview

Machiavelli's Position In The Florentine Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1605 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli's Position In The Florentine Government
The Prince Machiavelli, a man who greatly wanted to become involved in politics, wrote The Prince to earn a political position in Florence under Lorenzo de’ Medici, the governor. Although his efforts did not win him a position in the Florentine Government, his work has become a controversial topic today. In his book, Machiavelli uses historical events to explain his opinion on principalities. When The Prince was first written, Machiavelli’s view on principalities did not draw much attention but as his work spread, people began to interpret his work as evil, and immoral. According Machiavelli, there are two forms of government, a republic or a principality. Principalities, either new or hereditary are achieved, “with the arms of others …show more content…
A prince should first decide how much injury to inflict and strike quickly and all at once. He then, should not bring injury to the people for a considerable amount of time. If a prince does so correctly and consistently, he will not receive glory but his subjects will over time forget the violence and cruelty inflicted upon the state. Machiavelli used Agathocles the Sicilian, to clarify this point and stated, “Yet it cannot be called prowess to kill fellow-citizens, to betray friends, to be treacherous, pitiless, irreligious. These ways can win a prince power but not glory” (Machiavelli 29). The point of using force and violence is not to gain glory but to create fear among the people and to force them to support the prince. Although the prince receives the overall goal, his cruelty toward his people is not appropriate or acceptable. A prince should win the people’s support with his actions and …show more content…
A prince should be concerned about what is best for the state and not about what his people think. If cruelty is necessary and practical, it should be done and the wellbeing of his people should be put aside. Although generosity is sometimes an option, Machiavelli suggests that cruelty is usually the best option and causes the people to fear him. Fear, allows the prince to keep order and guarantee cooperation. Though a prince should want to be both loved and feared, it is “difficult to combine them, it is far better to be feared than loved if you cannot be both” (Machiavelli 54). To explain this concept and convince Medici, Machiavelli used historical people including Caesar, Cyrus, Alexander and Hannibal. Machiavelli suggests that the people of a state should not be any concern to a prince if the state is in danger of rebellion. This view of how a prince should govern, is often considered unethical and cruel. The people of a state should always be treated fairly and should not have to fear their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli points out that once the prince is in place he cannot be as foolish as to leave of others in power or to let anyone come to be as powerful as he is. Instead he is either to destroy their power or make it impossible for one to come to power without relying on the prince’s own authority and influence.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, when a prince decides to seize a state, he must determine how much injury to inflict. He needs to strike all at once and then refrain from further atrocities. In this way, his subjects will eventually forget the violence and cruelty. Gradually, resentment will fade, and the people will come to appreciate the resulting benefits of the prince’s rule. Most important, a prince should be consistent in the way he treats his subjects.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, it is just right for individuals to be scared than loved considering men and women react better to punishment than love. This is because you ought to be tough if you find yourself a prince, and you are attempting to make your nation higher. It's excellent for a prince to be considered not cruel, however it's more in most cases that cruelty can be used as a better weapon. A prince needs to be cruel in a situation that would benefit its state. Hannibal was excellent given that he used to be insanely cruel.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In chapter one this short chapter lays the foundation for Machiavelli's book. All kinds of authority, he says, can be divided into two large categories the republics and the principalities. Principalities can be either hereditary passed down from father to son or they can be new states acquired through military force or political fortune. Machiavelli continues by admitting that hereditary principalities are much easier to govern than those that are newly developed since the prince who rules by inheritance simply has to follow in the paths of his ancestors. The Duke of Ferrara is an example of such a prince. Though he was attacked by outside forces on two separate occasions, the fact that he was a hereditary prince placed him on good standing…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli 's, The Prince serves as a handbook to future rulers with their roles and responsibilities. Machiavelli begins his handbook with his view of princely virtues. He argues that in order for a person to be a good leader and stay in rule he must not just be a good person but that “he must learn how to not be good” (Lawall et al, 1951) in order to protect himself from anyone trying to overtake his rule. He must always be prepared and not make himself the “good guy” all the time. Machiavelli shows that being a good person all of the time will only allow for the bad people to overpower the good people, “because anyone who determines to act in all circumstances the part of a good man must come to ruin among so many who are not good” (Lawall et al, 1951).…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Published in 1532, Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince describes how a principality should be run within feudal times. Since its publication, The Prince has been criticized for some of its abstract ideas, although it is also renowned for being one of the first works of political philosophy. Throughout his book, Machiavelli describes many commitments and challenges a prince faces when he comes to power, mostly dealing with his people and government. Machiavelli’s views on government, power, and leadership often reflect a government with totalitarian control, but his ideas are not totally absurd, as some connections between his book and the United States government are apparent.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli, born in Florence in 1469, remains one of the most controversial authors to this day. His work demonstrates his expertise with military power, political success and historical events. His experience and understanding is a sum of all aspects of his life—from serving on the commune of Florence to carrying out his own military missions. Even when Machiavelli was accused of conspiracy and sentenced to a period of exile and torture, that did not keep him from producing some of his most influential work, including The Prince. The final, most renowned section of this book focuses on the qualities and assets of a prince, himself. Although many other theorists have covered the topics expressed, Machiavelli—being the pragmatist that he is—insists that practical, rather than ideal rules should be applied toward a Prince’s characteristics. In chapter XV, he acknowledges the fact men never live every part of their life virtuously, and that should a Prince strive to do so, he would surely ruin himself. Instead, Machiavelli believes the Prince should exhibit values that will gain him the most important benefits, even if that means not abiding by strictly virtuous characteristics. He expands on this in chapter XVI, describing that although generosity is strongly desired, it can be detrimental to the Prince’s reign. Because others cannot see truly virtuous generosity, in order for the Prince to be considered generous he must appear extremely lavish. This is obtained by raising taxes, which harms more people than it benefits and ultimately creates hatred and disrespect. In chapter XVII, Machiavelli continues to talk about the balance between cruelty and clemency, and which favors the Prince’s rein. Although ideally every Prince wants to be considered merciful, it is better to be called cruel if that is what it takes to keep the people peaceful and loyal. If he shows no mercy to the few people that disobey the law, the greater…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Cruelty

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is through the cruelty presented in works such as The Prince that has led to the disdain for the term Machiavellian. It has become synonymous with the ideas of duplicity in diplomacy, with little regard to the effects on morality. However, The Prince is not necessarily a treatise desiring violence and cruelty, but a document founded upon the ideas of pragmatism. To Machiavelli, the use of cruelty is not meant to be done for the sake of cruelty itself, but for the ideas of cruelty being well used. Its central doctrine is the idea that the ends justify the mean.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was harsh in his tactics, but they were not only effective by successful. When the Medici family was run out of Italy by the French invasion, there was a period of time where the Italian government didn’t know what to do, so they didn’t operate effectively, if they operated at all. Italy’s power began to grow weaker until a man working for the Italian government, Niccolò Machiavelli, decided that it was time for him to chime in and take control. He wrote a rulebook, essentially, on how the Renaissance Italian government should rule called The Prince. This novella guided the Italian Renaissance government on how they should rule while the Medici’s were out of power. Throughout his novella on modern political philosophy, Machiavelli constantly refers back to his theory that “a ruler should be feared father than loved.” Oddly enough, Machiavelli was a statesman, but he appears to sanction behavior of unethical and scheming monarchs, or princes, to rule over the people they govern. He uses the metaphor to illustrate how a ruler should be like a fox, to recognize the traps, and like a lion, to scare away the wolves, in order to benefit themselves ad their country.…

    • 854 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli’s The Prince is a comprehensive guide on how a prince should govern. Written in 1513, it addresses a multitude of topics, including whether one should be feared or loved, how to avoid hatred, and how a prince should spend his money. While the advice was more applicable in the Renaissance, when most rulers governed with absolute power, either in their city state or their country, it does not apply well to today, when institutions such as parliaments and congresses exist to check the power of nation’s rulers. This is easily seen through Machiavelli’s advice on cruelty and being feared versus being loved.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Prince Machiavelli tries to approach the rules in order for them to understand the importance of knowing how to rule from a citizen’s perspective. He states that there are two main types of principalities: the new and the hereditary ones. The first ones, are acquired through the usage of force or influences, so their life cycle are more difficult to over go. On the other hand, the second ones are passed from one generation to another, so as they are already in the tradition of the people, they are accepted and liked. An important aspect that Machiavelli reveals is the contrasting perspectives between mixed principalities, for costumes differ between old reigns and recently conquered ones, as well as expectations.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my point of view, Machiavelli wrote “The Prince” as a manual of how to rule back on those days; nonetheless, nowadays things have changed and in order to be a good ruler you must act differently. For example, if you want to be president of a country you cannot make decisions without taking in consideration the people’s opinions. The key to win over the people is to listen to them and let them express their points of…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    achiavelli presents a unique view on governing a state. Machiavelli believes the ruling Prince should be the only authority that…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Price Machiavelli says “that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than lived, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with” (Machiavelli XVII). Going along the lines of fear and love, Machiavelli believes that a prince should be considered “element and not cruel,” but should not overuse his cruelness and authority. Machiavelli states in The Prince “therefore a prince, so long as he keeps his subjects united and loyal, ought not to mind the reproach of cruelty; because with a few examples he will be more merciful than those, who through too much mercy, allow disorders to arise from which follow murders or robberies” (Machiavelli XVII) He says that people need to be punished for their actions because if they are not punished then citizens will do what they want and if he shows mercy and lets people off the hook then they will not take him seriously. Machiavelli also stresses that in order to be a successful ruler one must be generous to his people, but not too generous or else people will become greedy and ruin his state.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Research Paper

    • 2149 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Prince gains territory by victory and sets solid foundations for the territory to flourish upon, “One, however, who becomes Prince by favor of the populace, must maintain friendship, which he will find easy, the people asking nothing but not to be oppressed”(Santoni, 1950). Machiavelli believes that a good nation with just laws will develop from an efficient military. He is not arguing that you need a war to create a state, but rather a successful victory can create a solid foundation of the state. Machiavelli understands human nature and decides to work with it rather than disregard our flaws. He knows we are not all good, but acknowledges that there is potential for us to change (Lerner,…

    • 2149 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays