Preview

What Is Machiavelli's View Of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
627 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Machiavelli's View Of Government
In The Prince Machiavelli tries to approach the rules in order for them to understand the importance of knowing how to rule from a citizen’s perspective. He states that there are two main types of principalities: the new and the hereditary ones. The first ones, are acquired through the usage of force or influences, so their life cycle are more difficult to over go. On the other hand, the second ones are passed from one generation to another, so as they are already in the tradition of the people, they are accepted and liked. An important aspect that Machiavelli reveals is the contrasting perspectives between mixed principalities, for costumes differ between old reigns and recently conquered ones, as well as expectations. Therefore,
maintaining
…show more content…
Also, if the prince is to be settled arbitrary by them he will always have a pending debt. Additionally, He never actually talks about morality or being ethical, but states different tasks a prince should be able to accomplish, this acts of cruelty are in fact helpful for Machiavelli, for he considered them tactics needed in order to govern. Moreover, for a prince to have an effective government he could devastate or use the reigns laws to maintain control over people. Now, if an ecclesiastical principality is stablished, then the “higher powers” will govern for the prince.
The two main supports of a principality are laws and armies. For Machiavelli , warcraft encompasses intelligence (inner and external factors) and weapons The most trustworthy armies are the prince’s owned ones, for they are loyal. The other two put the whole principality in danger of complot or debt.
Some important characteristics that a prince must have are: self-reliance, benevolence, cruelty, support, love from people, admiration, courage, faith, generosity, patriotism, influential, he must be bale to fortify his city and solidify support and foundations, he
…show more content…
He states that is better to start from the bad characteristics for the people to notice the change into the good ones.
Machiavelli, considers promises not to be so reliable, for as men, people tend to lie and change sides on their best interests. Additionally, he says a prince should protect himself from the inner people by lowering the hate and externally by detecting the enemies. The usage of strategies is important for the prince should never let towns be undivided, or weaponed; Also, to accomplish prestige by acquiring alliances. Now, when selecting the ministers there might be 3 classifications, by independent, acknowledgment and neither. Being able to select the correct ministers determent he reputation the prince will be having, so a prince should choose to be seen as wise.
In conclusion, Machiavelli tries to give a guide for the rulers to follow in order to accomplish the best principality ever. He ends the book by stating that there are neither bad lucks, or merely fortunes the main causes of failing principalities, but the incompetence within the prince which guides him to a dead end. However, it tells Italy that Lorenzo Di Medici is the hope of the country for he is a great man capable of learning from past experiences and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the excerpt Machiavelli uses logos to talk about this issue in a logical manner. His first step in approaching this topic is when he states to the reader that others have tried to discuss how a prince should act. Machiavelli states that he is doing something along the same lines but what he says is that a prince must be able to do what is not…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli's The Prince, hints of future democratic theories can be pulled out of Machiavelli's plan for the success of a prince of a state. Within Machiavelli's concentration of plotting out successful achievement of a stabilized state within a principality, he often reveals the importance of the satisfaction the people within the governing walls of that principality. One of the themes to Machiavelli's plan included the dismissal of the affection of virtue of the nobility as well as the significance of an honest people. Even though Machiavelli may have had other motivation for the writing of "The Prince",…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian historian, politician, diplomat, and philosopher during the late 1400s early 1500s. Machiavelli is considered the father of modern political theory; and his theories are most prominent in his short book, “The Prince”. Machiavelli’s “The Prince” is main purpose is to tell rulers how to remain in power once they have gained it. The best way to go about ruling according to Machiavelli is to simply rule well. However if this does not work Machiavelli recommends several different strategies such as the use of violence. During Machiavelli’s time his theories were not widely accepted and because of this he died in shame. Machiavelli acted on his thoughts and beliefs despite what society taught and believed. However once time passed Machiavelli’s philosophies were better understood and accepted. Other philosophers began take portions of his philosophy to add to their own. This brought upon a new respected look to Machiavelli rather than the shameful look he died with.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli the Prince

    • 10718 Words
    • 43 Pages

    Machiavelli explains why maintaining a new principality is more difficult than maintaining a hereditary state. In the first place, people will willingly trade one recently arrived ruler for another, hoping that a new ruler will be better than the present one. This expectation of improvement will induce people to take up arms against any relatively unestablished prince. Although the people may quickly realize that their revolt is ineffective,…

    • 10718 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout The Prince, there is a certain academic tone to Niccolò Machiavelli's writing, and the presentation of his theories and observations is extremely pragmatic. In consequence, it was surprising when, in chapter 25, Machiavelli began to speak, quite frankly, about the role of fate and fortune in a principality, saying that, "...fortune is arbiter of half of our actions, but also that she leaves the other half, or close to it, for us to govern" (98). This at first glance appears to be a far more fanciful notion than the ones that Machiavelli had previously maintained. However, as we delve deeper into Machiavelli's work, we are soon able to realize that there are underlying connections to fortunes role – as well as what our own reprisal ought to be – all throughout the text.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Church said things must be done a certain way and people must behave a certain way but Machiavelli argued that we shouldn’t let god solely control our lives and to live for once and take matters into your own hands creating your own destiny. The Prince is one big idea of the way things should be and presented views of humanism and the Catholic Church dogma that are backed by lessons in history that Machiavelli used to demonstrating the way a ruler should lead in regards to government. The Prince says argues not only individuality but collectivism in humans as a…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, Machiavelli shows that in order to be an effective prince, one must disregard the morality of one’s actions in certain times for the welfare of the state. This strong belief shows that Machiavelli’s best interests are in the state and not in the general population. Because he…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Petrarch and Machiavelli

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the fourteenth century, the humanist philosopher Francesco Petrarch wrote a letter entitled How a Ruler Ought to Govern His Sate. Nearly a century later, another philosopher by the name of Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a book about governing, The Prince. The two documents show many similarities in content and theme. While the two wrote in similar subject matter, it is clear that these philosophers possess distinctly different viewpoints on how a ruler should govern. In Petrarch’s How a Ruler Ought to Govern His Sate and Machiavelli’s The Prince, both philosophers possess different opinions on how a ruler ought to govern. In particular Machiavelli pays specific attention to the importance of appearing like a good ruler. There is much evidence to support this in the readings.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout The Prince, Machiavelli outlines the characteristics needed to be a strong and admirable leader. He explains that personal characteristics such as courage and compassion, both being aspects of virtue, will earn him praise. However, he feels that this expectation is unrealistic and a prince’s first job is to protect the state, and having “bad” characteristics is sometimes necessary to reach that goal. That being said, in order to protect the state a prince may have to act unscrupulously at times which he believes will bring good fortune in the long run. Machiavelli believes that no matter how a prince acts, whether moral or not, virtue and fortune are the two most influential forces in politics and he shows how, throughout history, they have affected different people in powerful positions. Using the lessons learned by previous people of great political power, Machiavelli points out virtues and fortunes present in the particular cases, while then explaining his beliefs and solutions to the examples from the past. Virtue and fortune go hand in hand throughout this guide. One…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli intended The Prince to serve as a guide to creating and holding on to a principality. In it, he also characterizes a "good" society and the necessary tools for building one. Although Machiavelli conceives the republic as being the most practical form of government, he reasons that it is still possible to create a good society under a monarchy, as long as the leader of the monarchy follows the stipulated guidelines. Machiavelli realized that humans are predisposed to act perniciously and therefore it is the responsibility of the prince to exploit that nature in a way that will benefit society as a whole. In this way, Machiavelli's prince is an ideal crafted from the actual, rather than an actual crafted from the ideal.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lead with Example

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stability in a ruler’s morals and ethics are a vital asset to have when ruling a group of people. With similarities shared between the ruler and the common person the ruler will then be able to relate and be more respected amongst the population, as opposed to a ruler who rules with his own self interest at hand. In the piece, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli argues the many principles of how a prince should and should not rule. In order to rule successfully he states a prince must possess some of the following characteristics; morality, a strong army, strict rule, common ground with his people and also to be widely respected. Machiavelli laid the ground work for many rulers in the future with his modern view in a time where rulers were primitive and ruled through fear and terror. The Prince and its ideas can even be seen today in our modern day presidents and kings proving that Machiavelli had compelling ideas and arguments for how leaders can obtain and hold a position of power successfully.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my point of view, Machiavelli wrote “The Prince” as a manual of how to rule back on those days; nonetheless, nowadays things have changed and in order to be a good ruler you must act differently. For example, if you want to be president of a country you cannot make decisions without taking in consideration the people’s opinions. The key to win over the people is to listen to them and let them express their points of…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Who Is Naruto A Hero?

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    Boy oh boy, where do I begin? It's been a hell of a ride. Seeing our hero Naruto fulfill his lifelong dream of becoming Hokage after so many years. Looking back at what took place years ago is really nostalgic. When Naruto was younger, the people of the village feared him because he held the nine tails chakra within him. He felt lonely and empty inside because people tended to avoid him. But that all changed when Naruto joined Team 7, composed of Sasuke, Sakura, and Kakashi.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays