Machiavelli asserts that, "...for if one governs himself with caution and patience, and the times and affairs turn in such a way that his government is good, he comes out happy; but if the time and affairs change, he is ruined because he does not change his mode of proceeding" an act that he indisputedly condemns Pope Julius II for (100). We can easily deduce from this that Machiavelli is not referring to fortune as a being who commands every action of the human race, but rather, it is the spectrum of things that we are not able to
Machiavelli asserts that, "...for if one governs himself with caution and patience, and the times and affairs turn in such a way that his government is good, he comes out happy; but if the time and affairs change, he is ruined because he does not change his mode of proceeding" an act that he indisputedly condemns Pope Julius II for (100). We can easily deduce from this that Machiavelli is not referring to fortune as a being who commands every action of the human race, but rather, it is the spectrum of things that we are not able to