Preview

Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis
Throughout The Prince, there is a certain academic tone to Niccolò Machiavelli's writing, and the presentation of his theories and observations is extremely pragmatic. In consequence, it was surprising when, in chapter 25, Machiavelli began to speak, quite frankly, about the role of fate and fortune in a principality, saying that, "...fortune is arbiter of half of our actions, but also that she leaves the other half, or close to it, for us to govern" (98). This at first glance appears to be a far more fanciful notion than the ones that Machiavelli had previously maintained. However, as we delve deeper into Machiavelli's work, we are soon able to realize that there are underlying connections to fortunes role – as well as what our own reprisal ought to be – all throughout the text. …show more content…
Machiavelli asserts that, "...for if one governs himself with caution and patience, and the times and affairs turn in such a way that his government is good, he comes out happy; but if the time and affairs change, he is ruined because he does not change his mode of proceeding" an act that he indisputedly condemns Pope Julius II for (100). We can easily deduce from this that Machiavelli is not referring to fortune as a being who commands every action of the human race, but rather, it is the spectrum of things that we are not able to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Leaders of countries or Princes must make decisions that not many will agree with, but are the best for the populace and he must make them, no matter the cost. Niccolo Machiavelli uses logos, ethos and distinct clear diction to prove the necessity for a ruler to be able to make unpopular decisions, in an excerpt from his book “the Prince” (1532).…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to popular belief, Machiavelli is not a diabolic political figure in search of power. He is instead an astute politician who uses his extensive knowledge of politics to analyze various princes and principalities in order to educate future…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli isn’t necessarily a teacher of evil because of his courtesy to educate others about past history and persuade people to think differently. We are shown from the Prince that although Machiavelli does have an admiration for ones fortune and skill (virtue). Although there is a set of controversial approaches that he tries to suede people in a position of power to adjust themselves. With this we can learn that although there is to be some success in the mist of violence shown through his teachings it shows that although it is unnecessary and will cause the people who are innocent to retaliate against their administration. Machiavelli also mentions some key past princes who have misused their power.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli's The Prince, hints of future democratic theories can be pulled out of Machiavelli's plan for the success of a prince of a state. Within Machiavelli's concentration of plotting out successful achievement of a stabilized state within a principality, he often reveals the importance of the satisfaction the people within the governing walls of that principality. One of the themes to Machiavelli's plan included the dismissal of the affection of virtue of the nobility as well as the significance of an honest people. Even though Machiavelli may have had other motivation for the writing of "The Prince",…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle came up with a persuasive pattern we see in media all over called, rhetorical appeals. Ethos, logos, and pathos are seen in various types of media, ads, magazines, and many more. In “The Qualities of a Prince” an excerpt by Niccolò Machiavelli, he informs us about how a prince is able to hold his title and position and how to maintain the power that he has over the people. He uses past experiences for examples on how to maintain power. In Capitalism: A Love Story by Michael Moore, he tries to incorporate the rhetorical appeals into his argument about power. In order to use these appeals he shows how the government has abused capitalism and gains the viewers trust by using persuasive patterns. Each…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this excerpt of The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli argues that a good prince should be more concerned with maintaining the security of the state than with morality and ethics, pointing out that, although an ideal prince would be perfect in every way, ideal princes don’t exist. So a prince must therefore choose which qualities to regard in higher terms. Machiavelli uses as an example of this the quandary of whether ‘tis better to be feared or loved, saying that being feared is better (though not unto the point of hatred), because people are inherently bad, and fear of punishment is a stronger motivator than desire to be good. A prince, he says, must master the arts of deception and cunning; not only should he have a lion’s courage but a fox’s…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Metaphors are an important ingredient to speech and argument. It is used to show comparison between two things, a way to create new meaning. Niccolò Machiavelli in his book The Prince discuss of social and political along with his creative usage of metaphors. His ideas consist of Medicine, the Fox and the Lion, as well as The Archer. These are the metaphors that I will be discussing as we go in more debt about Machiavelli and James Kastely thoughts of argument. Machiavelli on the other hand may have used these metaphors as arguments. He does not imply it directly, but his twist and turns of his writing may be comparable to Kastely arguments about "rendering the indeterminate determinate" but not quite so with the…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is Machiavelli’s attitude toward mankind? Does his view of man’s relation to fortune reflect optimism or pessimism?…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: Many people who have read The Prince by Niccoló Machiavelli were appalled by Machiavelli’s fierce and authorative tone he used to assert his ideas, especially his concept of how the ends justify the means, which slowly made people begin to criticize him and his book as immoral, wicked, and evil. For this reason, Machiavelli began to be insulted as a ruthless and evil person, or in the adopted term, a Machiavellian. Machiavelli didn’t wish to care for morals or spiritual integrity; however, he didn’t arrange to establish the approach to wickedness. As a matter of fact, he argues that the concept the ends justify the means are meant to be followed, but only when necessary commands for it to happen.…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    So much of what he is saying is simply trust yourself, and find balance in how you rule. Too harsh or too merciful, too transparent or too deceitful, too trusting or too suspicious and you have set yourself up for failure. From Machiavelli's point of view, lacking this ability to walk both sides of the line would make a rise to power difficult and maintaining authority even harder. All of this can be true of a number of situations from a restaurant manager to the President of the United States. You see this theme of balance in chapter 25 when he speaks about a persons power over Fortune.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On the other hand, because fortune is unreliable, no matter how virtuous the ruler, the power may be lost as in the case of Cesare Borgia. He was given the chance to be a ruler through inheriting the title from his father, Pope Alexander VI. From Machiavelli’s perspective, during his rule, Borgia portrays his virtue and becomes a good example for other to follow. However, with his father’s early death and his own sickness, fortune does not seem to be on his side and he begins to lose his control. With his final error of choosing the wrong Pope, he completely loses his power. Borgia shows the effects of having bad fortune which lead to bad decisions on his…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was trying to gain the favor of a local leader by giving him advice. Through the use of repetition, historical reference, and persuasive aphorisms Machiavelli effectively conveyed the important skills required to be a prince.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli V. Bush

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s ideal princely duties include “all mercy, all loyal, all sincerity, all humanity, all religion” (Rebhorn). Italian born, he carries a passionate enthusiasm for the Florentine republic. The Da Vinci of politics, Machiavelli manipulates deceit and duplicity to pursue political goals. Machiavelli presents his political ideals of princely responsibility via his legacy “The Prince”. Claimed as a paramount political activist and a brilliant strategy thinker, Machiavelli’s philosophy soared centuries ahead of his time.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lead with Example

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stability in a ruler’s morals and ethics are a vital asset to have when ruling a group of people. With similarities shared between the ruler and the common person the ruler will then be able to relate and be more respected amongst the population, as opposed to a ruler who rules with his own self interest at hand. In the piece, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli argues the many principles of how a prince should and should not rule. In order to rule successfully he states a prince must possess some of the following characteristics; morality, a strong army, strict rule, common ground with his people and also to be widely respected. Machiavelli laid the ground work for many rulers in the future with his modern view in a time where rulers were primitive and ruled through fear and terror. The Prince and its ideas can even be seen today in our modern day presidents and kings proving that Machiavelli had compelling ideas and arguments for how leaders can obtain and hold a position of power successfully.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays