Analysis Of Ross's 'Picture'

“Picture” was written in the early 1950s. It was one of the first nonfiction novels, a forbearer of the genre. As such, there was little to compare it to at the time of its publication. Readers had yet to encounter many works like it, so it had the appeal that only something new has. Another critical piece of historical context involves MGM itself. Ross wrote her book during a momentous time for the studio. Mayer, one of the founders of the studio and a fixture in the motion picture industry for decades, was engaged in a power struggle with Schary. As seen toward the end of Ross’ book, that conflict eventually ended with Mayer being forced out. It was a significant move in Hollywood, as Mayer was one of the titans of the industry. In addition to working at MGM, he was one of the founding members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the organization that awards the Oscars. During this time, it is also worth noting that the studio system was still in effect. This meant the studio, not the filmmakers themselves, often had more say in the final product. That system, with all its drawbacks and benefits, can be seen in Ross’ book. Additionally, this is still during what many call “The Golden Age” of Hollywood, which ended in the 1960s. Despite that, the industry was beginning to cope with
It serves as a document of its time, but so much has changed in the business that little of it is still applicable today. Moreover, the dialogue, which takes up such a large amount of space, can sometimes feel stilted, as people simply don’t talk in the style depicted here. In addition, we now have ample evidence of the way filmmaking works. Few moments in the book are revelations anymore. In this way, Ross’ work is hurt by being such a precursor to a good portion of the coverage around Hollywood because it does not t feel as fresh as it must have upon its