Those two things seem to coincide with each other. Lately on the news there have been a number of mass shootings, terrorist attacks, violence in neighborhood, etcetera. As the number of these crimes seem to happen more often throughout the years, peoples fight or flight instincts tend to kick in, and they feel like they have to do what they need to do in order to protect themselves. And that usually results in people's fight response being activated, and wanting to be feel like they are able to keep themselves and their family safe end up with them going out and getting a gun. As of last October, the Gallup poll was taken and stemmed out into saying that 63% of Americans believe that having a gun in their household makes them feel a whole lot safer than having a home without a gun. According to the Pew Research Center Survey only 37% of adults own a gun in their household. While the numbers may appear to not seem like a lot, as a researcher it's hard to pinpoint the exact number of individuals who do have a gun in their possession due to not everyone answering the survey on whether or not they have acquired a gun. So the big question for the people and the government are "Is the right to keep and bear arms a civil right?" and " Should we have restrictions when obtaining a gun?" So the present today debate on the Second Amendment main focus is on the protection of an individual right to bear arms or is it a right than can only be protected by the…
For years now our country has been in a heated debate on the second amendment. Some people feel that it is not safe to let citizens have and carry guns, while others agree it is their right as an american to own a gun. In America, there are approximately 270 million firearms possessed by civilians, and only 897,000 carried by police.Close to 33,000 Americans were victims of gun-related deaths in 2011 and an average of 268 citizens are shot every day. In the past decade our country has witnessed 142 mass school shootings and, in 2010 alone 19,392 people committed suicide with a gun. These frightening statistic are what I believe cuz some people to be against the second amendment.…
The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…
Similar to that of the Second Amendment, argument is between those who are pro-guns versus anti-gun. Pro-gunners are advocating for, not more lenient laws but simply, that the government attempts to better enforce the laws that are already in existence. Comparatively those who are questioning the validity of the Second Amendment are appealing to the government to place stricter restrictions on the ownership and distribution of guns. Those who are pro-gun are supported by the National Rifle Association (NRA) in the United States, whose arguments, based in the right to “freedom” as according to the Second Amendment, are directly hindering the progress of gun control. The NRA claims that “there are currently more than 20,000 firearms laws in the U.S., clearly more than enough to punish criminals who misuse firearms, but the laws have to be enforced” (Braga 2001, 545). However many of these 20000 laws are restricted by others, thus making them unenforceable and furthermore, many of these laws were created with the intention to be difficult to enforce (Braga 2001, 546). The NRA has undermined many of the laws in place by the “sponsoring of legislation that undermines the ability of the ATF agents to build cases against unregulated private sellers involved in firearms trafficking” (Braga, 2001, 546). Those involved in the making of laws towards…
Symbolic policies on the other hand, have a minimum of material impact on people. It does not deliver what it appears to deliver. This policy allocates no tangible advantage or disadvantage. Symbolic policy will aid to change people’s values such as world peace, patriotism or equal rights or social justice. For example, freedom of speech and expression protected by the First Amendment, one has the right to voice their own opinion and make statements on a concern that interest them such as pro-choice or pro-life concerning…
The gun control debate is more than just a two-sided argument about should guns be legal or banned. It is an argument about the Second Amendment, it’s interpretation and whether it…
The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…
Since 1982, there have been at least 85 public mass shootings across the country, with the killings unfolding in 34 states from Massachusetts to Hawaii. Due to these mass shootings, the left side/liberals believe that the United States’ government needs to act and create and enforce gun control laws. Some people view all guns, no matter the purpose, as malicious and there is too easy of access to own a gun. The second amendment is in existence because our Founding Father’s saw how important it is for a free country to be able to stand up for themselves against tyranny. Those who are pro-gun control do not understand the valuable means behind the foundation of the United States of America. For 200 years, the second amendment has helped…
It is to be believed that America’s public safety is being threatened by guns. There have been numerous events leading up to this accusation. Today, there is a rising debate whether gun control should be legalized or forbidden. There stand two sides of this dispute, one is for bearing arms and the other is against it. One could infer that one side remains superior over the other. In America majority vote rules, therefore the gun control laws remain not into effect due to the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to possess and bear arms shall not be infringed” (ProCon.org, np).…
The Second Amendment states “"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Bill of Rights). It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. Americans felt that the right to arms was important for different reasons such as stopping invasions, participating in law enforcement, enabling the people to organize a militia system, preventing an undemocratic government, etc. Later into the twentieth century, a debate had grown about. The question most frequently being asked in many different words are, is the amendment that was created to ensure the continuation and successful of the state militias as a means of defense, or was it created to ensure an individual’s right to own a firearm. People, gun control advocates, began to read the second amendment concerned with rising violence in society and the role firearms play in that violence. While on the other side, firearm enthusiasts saw the attacks on gun ownership as attacks on freedom and defended their interpretation of the second amendment just as aggressively. Much of the debate that is going on today is centered on how the amendment was phrased and no…
The First Reason is by having more strict laws on gun control is reducing the usage of guns.By controlling guns is making…
Imagine an intruder entering your residence, picking the lock and invading your families’ personal and private place, your home. Now, remember that your father has a rifle locked away in a case in the back of the bedroom closet. You barely hear him as he removes the firearm from its resting place and loads a cartridge until to action, perhaps it’s your imagination. Yet, you can hear the intruder passing through the house as the eerie silence of time speeding by launches your senses into a fit of terror. Across the hall you hear your father slip out of the bedroom and pass your door. Flicking on the light he shouts at the intruder, “Get out of my house!” The intruder fires a handgun he had concealed and your father fires back. There he is, the man that invaded your home and endangered your family, wounded on the kitchen floor. The police arrive, having been called by your mother, and handcuff your father. He spends the next six years in prison for owning a firearm in an area where it’s prohibited without a license (Adams, M). Is this just? Is this the society we have created? The fundamental right to protect yourself, your family and your property denied because of an unconstitutional regulation forbidding the possession of firearms in one’s own home. The Second Amendment provides for the protection of the people of the United States and their rights, be they basic human rights or rights as citizens of a profoundly thinking country. It is through the Second Amendment that the founding fathers acknowledged the pre-existing right to protect ourselves, in so doing, guaranteeing American citizens the right to “bear arms”.…
The gun control issue has recently created a massive uproar throughout the U.S. due to some major horrific events such as the Virginia Tech shooting in 2007, where 32 people were killed, the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012 where 27 people were killed, mostly children, and the Columbine shooting in 1999 where 13 people were killed, (CNN) as well as many others. To some, it is a crime issue, to others it’s a right’s issue. It is, obviously, a safety issue, an education issue, a racial issue, and a political issue, among others, and within each of these issues there are those who want more gun control, the Democrats, and those who want less, the Republicans. There are lots of opinions on both sides of the issue ranging from moderate to extreme, and each has good points and arguments. Is there really a “right” party?…
Gun control in America should be limited based on second amendment rights that allow US citizens to protect themselves against their own government and in a private manner and limited changes in behavior by enforcing stronger laws. There has been controversy about gun control due to the recent public mass shootings and crime in our country. While stats can be used to persuade one way or another, true examination of mass shootings do not support arguments that ability to acquire guns is the true issue. In reviewing the position of the second amendment rights and facts related to private gun ownership and public mass shootings, research does not support increased regulations on guns as a means to reduce crime in the US.…
The debate for gun control has been a part of the American way for many years. Only in recent months has the situation become heated again, with the Newtown, Connecticut shootings to name one. Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner wrote in her article titled NRA Leadership Is Promoting an Irresponsible Position on Guns, “This tragedy was a wake-up call to the fact that nearly 40 percent of all gun sales in our nation happen without background checks, that military-style assault weapons with high capacity magazines can be bought in places like Wal-Mart, and that federal gun trafficking laws are largely missing in action in the United States.” I don’t believe this tragedy was a wake up call. I believe that any tragedy gets one to thinking about ways to better a situation and how to cope. Anyone can turn a tragedy into something that pertains directly or indirectly to them. And the fact that President Obama is exploiting these children and the families for his own agenda is sickening. I do believe there needs to be stricter gun laws. But as many have stated before, it’s a slippery slope.…