Analysis Of The Language Of Reading John Foster
1. What Foster means by a “language of reading” is the reader's ability to comprehend what is being said and applying it in a thematic sense in which is only done so by recalling certain memories thus identifying certain patterns and symbols throughout the story, it sets rules where readers learn to do when dealing with literature. Literature is full of ways and reading where experience will be increase when you can recognize the habit which expresses different ideas of the reader. The language of reading helps an individual improve and enhance on their skills. All of it is put together to bring out a symbolic meaning.
2. When Foster mentions, “There’s no such thing as a wholly original work of literature,” (p.24) and “there is only one …show more content…
What Foster means is that irony negates his writing and understanding. The irony creates excitement for the audience where they hope for one thing and the opposite happens. Not everything turns out the way you would think it would, you'd be surprised on how much irony is put into most shows and movies. The irony gives the audience an effect where keeps the reader and person interested wanting more.
10. Literary analysis is dependent on writers and the readers explanations because the allusions is drawn from the writer's work and is interpreted in many ways. Reading in literary analysis benefits the reader to understand the story and being able to make connections to bring out the certain symbolic meaning that is pointed out.
11. The content of Foster's has strengthened my ability to read “confidently and assertively” by understanding how to interpret all the literature of the book into assumptions and opinions. I have learned that everyone interprets their literature in their own unique ways. I gathered my own thoughts and opinions while reading this book and realized many effects it has on the audience. The lesson about “reading between the lines” resonates with me the most is how every reader will have their opinion on what they read and the different way on
2. When Foster mentions, “There’s no such thing as a wholly original work of literature,” (p.24) and “there is only one …show more content…
What Foster means is that irony negates his writing and understanding. The irony creates excitement for the audience where they hope for one thing and the opposite happens. Not everything turns out the way you would think it would, you'd be surprised on how much irony is put into most shows and movies. The irony gives the audience an effect where keeps the reader and person interested wanting more.
10. Literary analysis is dependent on writers and the readers explanations because the allusions is drawn from the writer's work and is interpreted in many ways. Reading in literary analysis benefits the reader to understand the story and being able to make connections to bring out the certain symbolic meaning that is pointed out.
11. The content of Foster's has strengthened my ability to read “confidently and assertively” by understanding how to interpret all the literature of the book into assumptions and opinions. I have learned that everyone interprets their literature in their own unique ways. I gathered my own thoughts and opinions while reading this book and realized many effects it has on the audience. The lesson about “reading between the lines” resonates with me the most is how every reader will have their opinion on what they read and the different way on