The emphasis is on opportunity. It levels the field for many who see them selves not represented in the vast majority of society. Walter Benn Michael’s states in “The Trouble with Diversity”, “ the whole point [is] for [universities and employers] to argue for the desirability for a diverse student body [and workforce] without appealing to the history of discrimination” (728). Institutions are meant to commit to diversification values without stemming into the notion of reverse racism. It is a common misconception that such policies undercut otherwise qualified white males in favor of unqualified marginalized …show more content…
The minorities in America are still citizens of the nation, yet are largely misrepresented, even with the acquisition of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. American society is far from having that equality forum it so eagerly boasts. According to Race In America, in 1996 when California Voters enforced Proposition 209, which eliminated most affirmative action programs statewide, it resulted in the drastic decline in admittance of African Americans and Latinos into California top Universities (478). Without the regulatory implementation of policies that favor minorities, institutions default back into their regular setting and disregard the notion of diversity. Minorities again suffer and their opportunities are once again limited. The fact remains that institutional racism, although reluctant to be discussed, is still a prevalent issue. Tim Wise states in “Affirmative Action Is Not Racial Profiling,” “despite affirmative action, statistics show that whites still are advantaged in educational opportunities and employments.” To argue that such policies are taking the position of other whites, is a huge misconception given the statistics nationwide. Society has the moral obligation to dismantle the wide belief of racial