As things are for now, I see this mémoire as a sort of case study of the perceptions of national and colonial identities by Britons within the Empire through the examples of the Indian Mutiny and the Morant Bay Rebellion. I believe that studying the tensions generated by revolts is a good means of getting to the bottom of one's…
Often, scholars approach their writing from the point of view of the colonizer. This lens is based in Eurocentric views dating back to the sixteenth century. In The White Man’s Indian, Robert F. Berkhoffer describes the contrasting category of the Indian as a “noble savage” that emerged early on and remained…
We find out much about British rule in India from the outbreak of fighting of the mutiny before 1857 as it tells us about how the East India Company forced strict rules and intervened upon the Hindu society such as ignoring their religious beliefs, which was one of the key factors leading up to the Indian ‘mutiny’. We see that although some changes did benefit from the Indians, the general attitude was negative, since all Indians were heavily taxed as discriminated. The way Britain changed from a trader to a ruler reveals to us how greedy Britain were at the time and how powerful as they could gain control of such a big country like India. We also can see how the British abused their power as they treated the Indians unfairly, as, in an account written by Vishnubhat Godse, an Indian who was living in the city of Jhansi in 1857, described how they British took…
The Brits, however, soon had their response. Niall’s arguments here consider the fact that although the British preached liberty and freedom, and did many things that were morally right such as outlawing slavery, they still seemed to contradict themselves in India in which they seemed far less tolerant to compared to their many white colonies. In fact, much of India’s civilians were put to work by the Brits in conditions much like that of the slaves elsewhere! Contrary to what it may seem, British rule wasn’t bad in every sense. They actually invested and introduced many advancements to India’s way of life.…
Bibliography: Dirks, Nicholas. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton, NJ:…
Kipling’s tale reflects the values of both the colonising British and the indigenous Indian population but the climax reinforces the colonialist values as being the more significant.…
By the end of the nineteenth century, Britain held power to India by means of colonization. This continued until the mid-twentieth century until India gained independence from Britain. Imperialisms implied motive is to land on an empty space which would initially “inscribe their linguistic, cultural, and later, territorial claims” (Singh 1). Modern Culture has written novels based on Indian colonialism, like Rudyard Kipling’s The Jungle Books. Kipling demonstrates in his novel how western colonization impacted Indian culture by the symbolism of animals.…
During the 1800’s in India, Britain had already set up colonized empires. Britain hoped to gain valuable resources such as iron and coal from imperialising India, as well as felt as it was their moral need to guide and culture the Indians, which is referred to as the ‘white man’s burden’. To help with this, the British created the British East India Company to deal with matters in India. The British believed Indian culture and…
Religion was a vital part of everyday life for the British. They felt that they had been ‘burdened’ with the task of having to spread their faith – Christianity. When the British had come into contact with the Aboriginals, they tried to ‘save’ them by introducing them to their religion, however, the Aboriginals had their own religion – the dreamtime.…
Similar to the idea of religion as a manifestation of exile in various stanzas within ‘The TV’, Crichton Smith’s poem ‘That Ethnic Differences Should’ highlights the poets personal feelings about religion as a whole and the extremity at which those go to in order to stay faithful to their God. Crichton Smith talks about his belief that God is the enemy, in which He promotes and encourages the most extensive variation of exile where people distance themselves from other cultures, ethnicities and religions in order to keep the peace between themselves and their idea of God. Through this suggestion, it can be interpreted that those who do suffer from this particular type of exile are then distanced from others and…
The Indians were mainly of the Hindu and Muslim religions. The Hindu Indians wanted to use their religion to signify to collect legitimisation. They believed in some things that the British didn’t, and forcing them to change religions was a highly disrespectful thing to do. The caste system was manipulated for British and Indians in the higher class. The British took the original system from the Hindu religion and changed it so that it fit to their standards. Being a part of the “untouchables”, which was the lowest caste there was, meant that you were disadvantaged and shamed upon.…
* “It is religion that gave birth to the Anglo-American societies: one must never forget this; in the United States religion is therefore intermingled with all national habits and all the sentiments to which a native country gives birth; that gives it a particular strength.” – pg 405-406.…
On this form you can express your preferences for modules in the 2013/14 academic year. Please bear in mind the following principles: if you do not, you are less likely to receive the modules you might desire.…
In this superb collection of essays, Sen smashes quite a few stereotypes and places the idea of India and Indianness in its rightful, deserved context. Central to his notion of India, as the title suggests, is the long tradition of argument and public debate, of intellectual pluralism and generosity that informs India's history.…
Sir Vidiadhar Surajprasad “V.S.” Naipaul was born in Trinidad on 17th August 1932, the descendant of indentured labourers shipped from India, this dispossessed child of the Raj has come on a long and marvellous journey. His upbringing familiarised him with every sort of deprivation, material and cultural. A scholarship to Oxford brought him to this country. Nothing sustained him afterwards except the determination, often close to despair, to become a writer. Against all likelihood, a spirit of pure comedy flows through his early books. It is a saving grace. Footloose, he began to travel for long periods in India and Africa. It was at a time of decolonisation, when so many people the whole world over had to reassess their identity. Naipaul saw for himself the resulting turmoil of emotions, that collision of self-serving myth and guilt which make up today's bewildered world and prevents people from coming to terms with who they really are, and to know how to treat one another. On these travels he was exploring nothing less than the meaning of culture and history. Victimhood might have been his central theme, granted his background. That same determination to be a writer also liberated him from self-pity. Each one of us, his books declare, can choose to be a free individual. It is a matter of will and choice, and above all intellect. Critics have sometimes argued that people - in the Third World especially - are trapped in their culture and history without possibility of choice, and can only be free if others make them so. To them, V.S. Naipaul's vision that they have to take responsibility for themselves can seem like some sort of First World privilege, and a conservative philosophy at that. Quite the contrary: the absolute rejection of victimhood is necessary if we are to meet as we must on an equal footing, and it is no exaggeration to say that he has shifted public opinion towards this understanding as no other writer has done. Courage…