raisins may be replaced by strawberries you do not have any. Now that we have to sweets out the way, a touch of savory ingredients is needed to enhance the dish, if I may call it a dish! Feta cheese always adds an air of class to the dish and tastes pretty good too! Adding cherry tomatoes is optional as it may clash with the dish in its entirety however; some of my friends find it incumbent that they are included! Healthy food for women is a necessity and ensuring that you get the right nutrients into your body is vital. An apple a day keeps the doctor away as they say; with healthy food, it echoes this very adage.
President Obama is trying to resell healthcare once more.
The election coming up in November 2010 will be important. President Obama knows this. Maybe that's why he's trying to resell healthcare again. President Obama made an appearance in Falls Church Virginia. Obama has said some healthcare benefits have kicked in for many Americans already. The healthcare law President Obama signed six months ago is set to start today. The patients bill of rights ensures patients get what they're paying for. One requirement is that children under age twenty-six stay on their parents healthcare policy. Co-payments are no longer charged for preventive care. No denial of coverage for children with preexisting conditions. Tax credits for business covering employees. Seniors receive rebate checks for prescription drugs. President Obama is having difficulty selling the healthcare plan to Americans. Could it be President Obama didn't state his case clearly? It's possible because when the law was passed many Americans didn't know much about the law. Insurance companies are not lowering premiums. Instead premiums are rising and the cost of healthcare is rising. When you ask insurance companies why the premiums are rising they blame the healthcare law. Americans want to know when the healthcare reform law will help them. The healthcare law will not help many Americans until 2014 because most laws don't go into affect until then. I asked one American about his thoughts on the healthcare reform law and here's what he said. "It's a tax raising free healthcare for some. Insurance and doctors are too wrapped up in it. When it's all said and done the working class will be footing more of the bill. In order to bring down healthcare costs is to go after the health insurance companies." One thing Americans don't like about the new health care law is their right to choose healthcare. Instead the government will choose for them. What Does The New Healthcare Plan Consist Of . For children
with pre-existing conditions there will be no denial of health coverage. . Children remain on their parents health insurance until age twenty-six. . No lifetime policy limits. . Children will be eligible to receive free immunization shots. . Preventive care will now be free of charge. . Insurance companies won't be able to practice revision. . Rights to appeal denial of a claim. . No prior approval for emergency room visits outside of providers plan. The healthcare law will take affect when your employers plan comes up for renewal. The health care plan seems too good to be true. For many Americans it's too good to be true and some feel the impact already. Why the Healthcare Plan Is Bad . Provisions taking place could cost healthcare to rise nineteen percent. . Lifetime cap could increase by twenty two percent. . Healthcare companies no longer offer child only policies. . Employers will ask workers to pay more toward their insurance. What does American really think about the new healthcare plan? Guess we will have to wait and see.
Types of Health Care Cases Because health care is an industry practice, it is easy for many people to think of health care cases and health care law in terms of malpractice or litigation - suing doctors or hospitals for malpractice. While a large and visible portion of law, my practice does not involve malpractice litigation. Instead, the focus is on corporate and regulatory aspects of the law. In fact, one of my goals is always to keep my clients out of litigation. Inevitably cases do come up that require litigation. How a litigator thinks of cases, however, is very different from how a corporate or health care attorney thinks about cases. Some of our projects involve very special assignments for hospitals - mergers or acquisitions. A client hospital, for instance, may want to buy another hospital or facility, or they may be looking at a particular transaction with a group of physicians. They may want to open a joint venture and create a free-standing surgery center or free-standing imaging center. We work on those kinds of projects, looking at all of the different legal aspects of it. This kind of practice is very different from working one case file called Smith v. Jones. In negotiation, as in litigation, the first and most important thing is to understand what the client ultimately wants to achieve. Second, you have to depersonalize negotiations. It is not about you - it's about what the client wants. You can't try to hammer home or belabor a point just to "win" one when it doesn't do much for the client. In general, that is the difference between corporate negotiations and litigation negotiations. In corporate negotiations, by and large, the parties have the same objective. They want to achieve the same end result, and it is simply a matter of how you get there and who takes what advantage to get there. In litigation, however, the parties want opposite results. It's all about who wins every issue, and you don't necessarily care whether the opposition gets to the same place as you. In fact, you don't want them to get there. You want to see them lag behind. It makes for a very different dynamic when you are negotiating in the business context versus the litigation context. In the corporate context, you must realize that there will be points your client is willing to lose and points your client will not be willing to lose. You simply have to balance which ones you can give on to get the ultimate result the client wants. Strategies for Clients In and Out of the Courtroom The attorney must first understand what the client is trying to accomplish. Maybe the client is trying to get into or out of a relationship, which could be anything from a joint venture to an employment agreement to a service contract. Regardless, we have to ask the client what he wants to accomplish in the end. No one goes into litigation with the simple goal of suing someone else. They are usually trying to accomplish something. Trying to gain an advantage during negotiations often results in litigation when the negotiations fail. Often, litigation simply adds expense, time, and confusion about what direction the client actually wants to take. If you start from the perspective of understanding the client's ultimate goal, then approaching litigation is easier, whether you settle or try the case to get the clients what they want. reference: Moral Dilemmas in Community Health Care: Cases and Commentaries by Becky Cox White, Joel Zimbelman - Longman Publishing Group