What should you consider when searching for useful sources? How do you know when sources are reliable? What are some red flags that indicate you should avoid a particular source?…
The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…
* When writing a research paper, you should never include Wikipedia as a resource, why is Wikipedia not consideration a credible source?…
The main concerns I have while conducting research, is knowing if the information is accurate for one, and does it really help me in my writing. With sites like Wikipedia, you have to assume they are not the only sites of their nature. While a lot of their information is correct, it may not be accurate or properly cited or documented. Others have to be doing the same thing, like urban dictionary among others. It makes me nervous unless I am on a .org or .gov website. Knowing if the information is truly helping my case, instead of hurting me is the other concern. Things can be taken out of context very easily, and either I, or the reader could mis-understand where I was going with something.…
All of my research was conducted on the internet. I had to search very carefully for information which was valid. I was cautious about websites that have the domain of wiki because the website can have invalid information. Then I would make sure that when I found a source to cite I would make the reference for my work cited page and place the in-text in as soon as possible so I wouldn’t forget.…
information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…
Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia; providing facts, advice, and opinions from one or more contributors. Although it provides users with a vast amount of information there is often no citation for the facts, which does not allow the reader to confirm the credibility of the record. The mere fact that anyone can manipulate the content submitted allows some readers to challenge the website information as biased or fabricated. Credentials are an important aspect of research; providing information only on topics in which they publish on their website.…
Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…
Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…
Relevance: According to the research on citations of Wikipedia, Along with the increasing number of citations, another indicator that Wikipedia may be gaining respectability is its citation by well-known scholars. (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2008)…
As a researcher, I must be aware of what information from the Internet. I must keep a look out for bias opinions, and cited materials.…
I feel one of the most important things to consider when evaluating a webpage is how current the information is on the article. Website can lose their credibility if the information that they provided is out of date. This makes it very crucial for websites to provide the newest information possible. Another issue that websites have is dead links. Dead links are web pages that have been updated or worked on and the…
Since navigating the web can be difficult in obtaining information Wikipedia should be viewed as a primary source of initial, credible and valid information. In academia credible information, “often means library-mediated proprietary sources such as scholarly monographs, reference books, and peer-reviewed journals” (Information Today, 2010, pg. 40). The problem with this fundamental academic definition is in self limiting resource web sites to the research student.…
Today in society, source credibility is becoming a bigger issue. Many people and students now a days find themselves in a predicament where credible sources are needed to help with research projects, essays, books etc. The internet is a big place and is filled with insane amounts of information for societies reach. The question is whether these sources are credible sources or just information filled in by average person with little experience or knowledge in the subject.…
You can determine if a website is reputable and worthwhile for a research paper by analyzing the url and synopsis. If a url is from a school, government site, or from a reputable company then it is probably a good source. Org sites are now sold to anyone so it does not mean that it is a non-profit company that you are dealing with. Wikipedia is also not a good source of information because anyone can go onto the site to post or edit information; therefore the information may not be from a reliable source. When you view the synopsis it can give you a preview of what the site is about. If you see a price then you know that they are trying to sell you something. You may also see political views, blogs, and other information that will alert you that the site is a waste of your…