Preview

Anarchy vs. Liberalism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2807 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anarchy vs. Liberalism
Contemporary liberal and anarchist philosophy are both two very different ways of trying to see what would be the best way to run society. While discussing these two ideologies I will try to show how both, in their purist sense, are not able work in today 's society effectively. Contemporary liberals are involved in every day politics but through over regulation and dependence on government they loose their chances of running a reliable democracy. Anarchist have very good ideas of how a natural society could function without government or modern institutions but the biggest problem they have is how to get to that point. Both theories look good on paper but once they hit the real world they change due to alternating conceptions and individual influences. The root of the word anarchism comes from the Greek word "anarchos," which means "without ruler." The main philosophy behind anarchism is that people can reside in an unregulated community with no real authority and maintain a sustainable life. Anarchists see government and capitalism as an institution that creates liberty for the rich and enslavement of the masses. Emma Goldman best describes anarchism as: "The philosophy of a new social order based on liberty unrestricted by man-made law; the theory that all forms of government rest on violence and are therefore wrong and harmful, as well as unnecessary." With anarchism there is a belief that once all government is abolished by the people that everyone will come together in a community of mutual aid and understanding without laws or authority to direct. Their philosophy can be considered opposite of most other ideologies, especially that of contemporary liberalism. Contemporary liberalism strives to hold on to the classic liberal 's ideals pertaining to political, economic, and social liberties but it tends to look at democratic government as a tool rather than a hindrance. John Stuart Mill, John Dewey, and Franklin D. Roosevelt are established ideologues of


Citations: "What is anarchism," An Anarchist FAQWebpage,www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1931/, Internet Explorer, 5/4/98. Schumaker Paul, Dwight C. Kiel, Thomas Heilke, Great Ideas/Grand Schemes: Political Ideologies in the 19th and 20th Centuries, New York, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 1996. Schumaker Paul, Dwight C. Kiel, Thomas W. Heilke, Ideological Voices: An Anthology in Modern Political Ideas, New York, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1997. Word Count: 2711

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Freedom vs anarchy Reagan states that the students were going on from “free speech to filthy speech”. This shows the behavior of the students during that period of time, in some of the documentary we saw in the class shows that the students were calling the authorities by some disrespectful names. All these behaviors lead the authorities to take action against the students because the government needed to have the situation under control. In the picture tittle Lonnie Wilson, Untitled taken on May 22, 1969 shows a group of heavy armed soldiers and in the other side a group of students. This shows that the government had to use force to stop those students. According to the way Reagan describes the student seems to states that the students…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal democrats were formed in 1988 from The Social Democrat party, set up by four ex labour members. Currently the liberal democrats have formed a coalition government with the Conservatives. Classical liberals traditionally believe in negative liberty when it comes to state power (The idea that the state should have as little intervention as possible, socially and economically to enhance the freedom and innovation of the individual, therefore not infringing basic, natural rights). Classical Liberals prefer to keep the state to a minimum however with enough framework to provide basic laws prohibiting other regarding actions and to regulate government power. These views where portrayed by many liberal philosophers such as Adam Smith, in regards to economic management; he believed that free trade and free markets where fundamental to successful economic growth, as individuals, consumers and business would create competition and feel confident within the economy. However more modern liberals believe in a form of positive liberty (More state intervention for progression by providing individuals with the tools to create a basic standard of living to develop there social and economic lives, with systems such as welfare) TH green believed there was a need to embrace positive liberty as he stated that individual liberty was only achievable under favourable social and economic circumstances (Creating the welfare system). However today’s contemporary liberal democrats have a combined belief of both positive and negative liberty. There is potential to suggest that there is a contradiction within the lib dems with regards to their position on the state.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberals, no matter classical or modern, believe in small state. As Thomas Paine put it: "Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil". This concept links nicely with the idea of democracy, which literally means "rule by people". Liberals have defended democracy on the grounds that people must have a way of protecting themselves against the government and its actions. This type of democracy is also referred to as protective democracy. Moreover, democracy opens an ability for people to choose. In a pure democracy, for instance, people would vote on every occasion and policy, hence the core liberal idea of individualism would flourish in its fullest. However, in modern society it is practically impossible to have pure democracy, so we have to resort to participatory democracy. This still support the idea of individualism, as each vote counts towards the end result.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anarchists believed in a society free of governmental institutions. This movement was viewed as extremist especially when it was associated with violent deeds like political assassinations.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Drew

    • 506 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Liberals believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems.…

    • 506 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Classical liberalism is much like individualism. Classical liberalist believes that the government should have a limit and that individual liberty it what matters most. Individual liberty including freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and free markets are all good examples of what classical liberalism would consist of. Classical liberals do not like for the government to interfere with their personal lives. They stress instead reliance on private initiatives or the free market to determine the best outcomes. (p. 3) Classical liberals are individuals who like to put themselves before anything or anyone. Therefore, when I think classical liberalism, I think about a saying my sister always say “let me do me while you do you”. Classical liberals do not trust the government 100%, but they respect the government.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberalism is a political philosophy which emphasizes on the rights of an individual, and usually the rights will assure by the government. Liberalism has turned up for around 300 years, and the complexity to explain and define liberalism is increasing as there are several forms, including classical liberalism, neo-liberalism, conservative liberalism, social liberalism, libertarianism and libertarian socialism (Mastin, 2008). Although anarchism, communism, democratic socialism, social democracy, communitarianism and liberal conservatism have the same objective with liberalism which support for democracy as well as basic equality and against authoritarianism, but it does not consider as liberalism (Haar, 2015).…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical liberalism specifically puts emphasis on a couple of key areas, individual sovereignty, and property rights. Classic liberals encourage "laissez-faire" public policy…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy vs Capitalism

    • 2445 Words
    • 10 Pages

    From the very beginning of human existence until today, the idea of capitalism has conquered the way we live, how we bring in capital and the way we buy and sell. Only during the past few decades has the ideology of modern democracy been developed and used, with many nowadays trying to bring apart the two ideas of democracy and capitalism. This study of the capitalism and democracy will look at both sides and arguments for and against followed by the detailed look into the relationship between the two.…

    • 2445 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Two Cheers for Anarchism, James Scott describes a way of looking at the world through something called an “anarchist squint.” An anarchist is a person who believes in or tries to bring about disorder. Scott states that if you put on anarchist glasses and look at the history of popular movements, revolutions, ordinary politics, and the state from that angle, certain insights will appear that are obscured from almost any other angle. Throughout his book, Scott also uses sociological imagination. Sociological imagination describe the ability to “think yourself away from the familiar routines of everyday life” and look at them from an entirely new perspective.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anarchism, not in the sense of lawlessness, but in the sense of noninterventionist governmental policy and activity, has a colorful history in the United States. It has enjoyed periods of welcoming and periods of scorn by every class of people and for widely varied reasons. It is embraced by free market economists and by the socially liberal, favored in part by both major parties and wholly endorsed by the Libertarian Party in the U.S. today. In the past, its place has been substantially different, for at different periods of time, different policies and mindsets on the parts of the citizens and the government have been at the forefront of progressive thought. Whether it is considered novel, conservative, beneficial, or detrimental is all dependent on a large array of contemporary social and economic considerations.…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It's not the rioters that cause harm to others because they support lawlessness over principled anarchy. The real anarchists are the intellectuals, the philosophers, the rednecks, the geniuses, the patriots, and every other person in between. Anarchists are all around, and all they want is to live life by affecting and being affected by no one else. Anarchy can be done in American society, as that was proven throughout this paper as we looked into the framework of anarchy, discovered the first forms of government, explored anarchist beliefs and concepts, and finally showed the correlation between anarchy and major ideals within the US. So go out, reject authority and live your life for…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many who oppose government and advocate anarchy are in favor of voluntary associations or non-hierarchal organizations. However, the absence of government and presence of anarchy, to many, is unrealistic and dangerous because it can only be favorable to all under the assumption that we, as humans, are inherently good and will not cause mayhem if all law enforcement ceases to exist. Philosopher Immanuel Kant described anarchy as “freedom and law without force,” but to many freedom means being able to walk outside without fear and with the knowledge that our rights are protected by a system put in place in order to inforce the law. While the absence of government does relieve us from the restraints that impede our complete freedom, it also makes our safety completely dependent on the idea that humans are inherently good, an idea that has been proven wrong time and again through systematic racism, slavery, murder, and…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Virtue of Selfishness by Ayn Rand, Rand talks about anarchism. Anarchism is the belief that any type of government should be prohibited. If there is no government then how would the country be standing. A type of government is need to keep the country from falling part. Rand mentions the problem of anarchism in her book.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the trails

    • 1825 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “LIBERALS” - believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all, and that it is the duty of the State to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Believe that people are basically good. Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve people’s problems. (Most are DEMOCRATS)…

    • 1825 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays