In many different ways are these styles different. Government, of course, has a direct affect on the people within that governing (or non-governing) nation. …show more content…
The camera follows farmer Jones, who walks drunkenly around the farm, poisoned by the bottle he now carries. Gates and cages are seen open with animals peeking out; only to slam in the faces of the “damned old hens” and the “good for nothing beasts.” Succeeding we see a dog, once on the doorstep of farmer Jone's house, then innocently walking away by the sound of Jone’s feet. Yet, she becomes the victim of a glass bottle that misses her by barely an inch. The movie expresses the fear in the animals eyes and body language, as they live in the hands of their dictator. In a meeting held by Old Major, right before the turn in leadership. We see flashback of even more abuse distributed by the farmer. Climbing up a large, steep hill, we see boxer pulling a mountainous cart of goods. Other visions include a hand stealing eggs, and mother and her new young at the coldest of winters. At the peak of Old major's speech we see a axe and freshly hung ham as he says “do we deserve such a fait?” With all of these vivid examples of torcher, we can confirm farmer Jone’s abusive and forceful behavior. Fortunately the uprising of the new leadership is already elevating, and the animals will soon get equality.
Old Major soon brings a Direct Democracy to the farm, meaning all animals have a vote and a say in the decisions and the farm makes. The difference in the reaction