Preview

Animal Testing: A Rimming Controversy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
85 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Testing: A Rimming Controversy
Millions of animals , millions of needles, and millions of failed tests . For years animal testing has been a brimming controversy for many . Some people believe that there is no harm in animal testing while others seeme to think that it is corrupt. Animal testing is in fact opprobrious and an immense threat to animals . According to Philosopher Jeremy Bentham the questions is not, can they reason, nor, can they talk . But, can they suffer ? ( qtd in Isacat 187)
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Ethical Boundary
    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of Ethical Boundary

    In the article “Ethical Boundary-work in the Animal Research Laboratory” Pru Hobson-West writes about the three obstacles in regards to the occasion of talking about the ethics behind animal testing. The three “boundaries” that Hobson-West refers to are the need for animals to be tested with reference to the advancement of medicines, the impacts of “Home Office regulation” and the third is the difference between Human and Non-human animals (1). One of the main arguments that supports the use of animals in scientific experiments stated in this article is that when deciding whether or not it is ethical to use animals, you must determine whether or not humans have a higher moral value than animals (660). Another argument is whether or not restrictions…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing: Good Or Evil?
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Testing: Good Or Evil?

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Essay - Animal Rights
    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Essay - Animal Rights

    Epstein and Brook attempt to persuade the reader into believing animal rights are bad for society. They highlight many positive influences of animal testing, and explain to the reader the global implications of discontinuing testing. The logic offered is reasonably sound in theory, though it is a bit too harshly worded at times. Although evidence of the constructive qualities of medical testing on animals is provided,…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Are Animals Right Or Wrong?
    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Are Animals Right Or Wrong?

    All of my life I have had a tremendous amount of passion for all animals, and in most instances I've found that I have felt more comfortable around them than I do people, finding myself drawn to their many personable qualities, such as innocence, loyalty, lack of judgment, and overall cheerful disposition. As I have grown, my care for animals and their well being has as well, and my eyes have been opened to the horrors taking place all throughout the globe involving poor, innocent animals, who are unable to defend themselves, against the very people they are meant to find companionship with. The controversy over the practice of utilizing animals for the purposes of testing has been an issue for the past 30-40 years, and with it, comes the moral debate. However, the topic of ongoing question, whether animal testing is right or wrong, lies within your own personal morals.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Two Sides to Animal Testing
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two Sides to Animal Testing

    Animal experimentation is a highly controversial subject throughout the world and in the 20th century the public has become increasingly aware of the two sides to animal testing. The earliest dated animal testing can be traced back to 384-322 BCE and it is still a common practice to this day. There are a few disagreements that are highly debated about animal experimentation such as the importance of the testing for scientific and medical goals, the suffering of the animals, and the ethical principles that apply to animals. Both sides of animal experimentation have their reasons and facts for why animal testing is ethical or unethical, but it comes down to the amount of pain the animals suffers and if it is morally correct.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Benefits Of Animal Testing
    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Benefits Of Animal Testing

    Animal testing is an expression that the vast majority has heard yet is maybe still uncertain of precisely what is included. Whether it is called animal testing, animal experimentation or animal research, it alludes to the experimentation completed on creatures. It is utilized to survey the wellbeing and adequacy of everything from medicine to beautifying agents, and also seeing how the human body functions. While supporters trust it is a vital practice, those contradicted to creature testing trust that it includes the torment and Suffering of Animals.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing: the Facts
    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Animal Testing: the Facts

    Why should animals not have the same rights that humans do? Maybe because they cannot talk, read books, or drive cars, but neither can some humans for that matter. So why is it that when an experiment, which was conducted to help treat type 2 diabetes, killed 203 people, it was halted immediately, although millions of animals die each year due to scientific experimentation? The answer is that many believe that animals are worthless or are not worth as much as human beings are, so they are therefore dispensable. The problem with that is animals are living things just like humans. Therefore, like human beings, they understand fear and experience pain. They also feel excitement and happiness. So why should they be denied the same basic rights that humans have? The answer to that question is that they should not be. Animals deserve the same rights that humans have, so testing that jeopardizes animal life, and safety should come to a cease immediately in the same way that it would if the same testing were to be conducted on human beings.…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing - 18
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animal Testing - 18

    Regulatory agencies across the globe make it mandatory for companies to get their 'products' tested for toxicity before making them available in the market. These 'products', which range from prescription drugs to cosmetics, are tested on animals to check for the degree of skin irritation, skin penetration, eye irritation, carcinogenicity, etc. On the basis of these tests, it is determined whether the said product is fit for human use or not.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Animal Testing Remain Legal?
    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should Animal Testing Remain Legal?

    Every year millions of animals are subjected to horrible unethical experimentations in order to advance medical science. Dogs, cats, monkeys, mice, and other animals are kept in dark rooms in cages while being exposed to various toxic and poisonous substances daily in order to test how the substance may react in humans. These poor creatures suffer from inhumane treatments and are denied any form of happiness, and these experiments should cease and alternatives should be used instead. Animal testing is a cruel and ineffective medical practice that produces unreliable results and those laboratories should use safer alternatives that will provide more accurate results.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Persuasive Paper
    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Persuasive Paper

    Attention Getter: Do you imagine the pet that you love being being use for test? Relevance: Although some people agree that animal testing is fine,but I strongly dislike the idea of the cruelty with the animal Credibility: According to Peta ’s fact sheet, they argue that ‘In many cases, animal studies do not just hurt animals and waste money, they kill people too.’” Thesis: Animal testing should be banned from United States. Preview: I will be discussing about animal testing and other options available. I have always felt strongly about animal rights, and cruelty to animals. Transition: Animal testing is the study, experimentation and research of any animal. Animal rights activists are opposed to using animals for medical research and experimentation because humans do not have the right to use animals. I. Animal rights Transition: Finding cures for humans and testing in animals. II. Animal testing Transition: In conclusion, A. Animal testing is not reliable and is very expensive. Animal testing is inhumane and now that there are alternatives to this, there is no excuse for anyone to still commit this act. Animal testing should be banned in America. I suggest that governments fully ban animal testing, so that the world becomes a better and safer place for both animals and humans.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing In Today's Society
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Testing In Today's Society

    Animal testing is a major debate in today’s society, but it is not just a problem of today. Animal testing dates back the 1800’s when Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory served to suggest that animals could serve as effective models to facilitate biological understanding in humans. Other cases of animal testing include psychological experiments such as the one by Ivan Pavlov in the late nineteenth century. He conducted experiments on dogs to demonstrate how dogs could be conditioned with regards to memory and repetitive tasks, but the first major reference to animal testing occurred in the late nineteenth century when Louis Pasteur gave anthrax to sheep and showed the importance of vaccines with his germ theory. (Murnaghan, Screen 1) Major…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Controversy Of Animal Testing
    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Controversy Of Animal Testing

    Animal testing is a very huge controversy and many people have an opinion on it. Some people wan animal testing to stop due to safety hazards and concerns for the animals, while others aren't so concerned about it, since testing it make it better for everyone. Animal testing used to be deemed necessary but not people can't be so sure. I personally believe that animal testing should continue and i will later state my reasons why. first, what exactly are the pros and cons of animal testing? Testing Animals has many good and bad reasons.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Testing Dilemmas
    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Animal Testing Dilemmas

    Animal testing is an ethical dilemma as it is using animals, which are other living creatures to profit humankind, when they are incapable of giving assent. Over 115 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in labs every year for any scientific experiment or test. This topic was chosen as it is one of the most controversial issues throughout the world. They raise ethical issues, as George Bernard Shaw, a political activist has said “The worst sin towards our fellow creatures is not to hate them, but to be indifferent to them: that is the essence of inhumanity.” , inflict both physical pain as well as psychological distress, are time and resource intensive and does not correctly predict reactions on human.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Animal Testing Wrong
    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

    “The question is not, can they reason nor can they talk, but can they suffer” said Jeremy Bentham,an english philosopher. Animal testing has been a controversial topic for many years. Some people believe that animal testing is beneficial, while other people feel as if animal testing is cruelty. Many people who are against animal testing have created organizations to spread awareness for people who do not know much of this topic such as in books and websites. Animal testing is abuse to the victims and is not very beneficial.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Morality Of Animal Testing
    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Morality Of Animal Testing

    Animal testing is undoubtedly one of the most controversial issues in modern society. This practice began in the 19th century; animals were used to test dosing of certain drugs and chemicals. In the 1920’s, animals were also being used to test pesticides and food additives (Fano, 11). Today, animal testing is used to study everything from cosmetics to cancer. With such a wide range of opinions on animal rights and human priority, it is no wonder that this topic is so controversial. There are people who have an extreme view on the issue and are either completely pro or completely con. In my opinion, the issue of animal testing is far too complex for one simple answer; its morality lies somewhere in between the two poles. Animal testing is acceptable if it results in saving people’s lives. It is not acceptable, however, if it results in personal or cosmetic products that are far from vital to the human race.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics