This issue is discussed in further depth in the introduction to the book, Do Animals Have Rights? Pro-experimentation thinkers believe that animals do not have rights and conclude that it is acceptable to follow through with animal testing. They follow the ideas of people such as philosopher René Descartes who believed “that no animals have rights because they do not use language, and because, he asserted, they are not conscious” (Carroll 4). Although it is true that most animals cannot communicate the way humans can, followers of this idea are misled, for consciousness can be defined as a state of awareness and can be categorized by thought and emotion. According to animal rights lawyer, Steven M. Wise, “entitlement to legal rights rests upon the existence of conscious states” (Carroll 5). Wise follows this declaration by stating how animals, such as great apes, behave in ways similar to the mental processes demonstrated by humans. They deceive and empathize with others, comprehend the idea of cause and effect, and can even recognize themselves in mirrors. For example, an ape can notice and will react to a splash of dye on their face when observing their reflection in a mirror. This characteristic in animals supports the idea of a conscious state, therefore animals are entitled to…
Gartner, John. "Vioxx Suit Faults Animal Tests." Wired.com. Conde Nast Digital, 22 July 2005. Web. 23 Apr. 2012. .…
Research shows that 26 million animals have been used for testing of all different kinds. 26 million animals have been put through wringer for the sake of a human. 26 million animals have had no say, defense, or chance to save themselves. Animals are used as human experiments to see if a certain product can work or not. Animal testing is wrong on many different levels. If humans are not willing to use, test and experiment on themselves, why should one be allowed to test on an animal who has no say in what happens.…
Regulatory agencies across the globe make it mandatory for companies to get their 'products' tested for toxicity before making them available in the market. These 'products', which range from prescription drugs to cosmetics, are tested on animals to check for the degree of skin irritation, skin penetration, eye irritation, carcinogenicity, etc. On the basis of these tests, it is determined whether the said product is fit for human use or not.…
Each year in the United States, an estimated seventy million animals are hurt and killed in the name of science by private institutions, household products and cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centers. Animal testing is wrong and downright mean. Innocent animals should not be treated badly and caused pain for the sake of a human 's safety. Many people think animal testing is good while others think it is wrong. I think it is completely and absolutely wrong. Some people argue that humans are not necessarily superior to animals, so why should animals be experimented on and made to suffer to protect human beings? Do you know what animal testing is, what condition the animals live in, and what some alternatives to testing animals are?…
Animal testing is a major debate in today’s society, but it is not just a problem of today. Animal testing dates back the 1800’s when Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory served to suggest that animals could serve as effective models to facilitate biological understanding in humans. Other cases of animal testing include psychological experiments such as the one by Ivan Pavlov in the late nineteenth century. He conducted experiments on dogs to demonstrate how dogs could be conditioned with regards to memory and repetitive tasks, but the first major reference to animal testing occurred in the late nineteenth century when Louis Pasteur gave anthrax to sheep and showed the importance of vaccines with his germ theory. (Murnaghan, Screen 1) Major…
Is it wrong to experiment on animals for our own benefit? Many may disagree and believe its immoral and shouldnt be done. Science and manufacturing need animal experimentation to prevent harm to humans because it helps to develope cures for disease and to save humans from experimentation.…
Approximately, more than 115 million animals worldwide are used in laboratory experiments every year (Humane Society International, 2010). Animals, from the fruit fly to the mouse, are widely used in scientific research. Research is critical for the advancement of medicine, leading to increased chances of survival from diseases and improved strategies to prevent them. Without animal experiments, transplants, diseases, cancer, and vaccines would not have been advanced. The use of animals can be inevitable, particularly in conditions that require first-hand understanding of biochemical processes in and outside the body. Therefore, animals should be used for scientific research.…
Animal testing is a very huge controversy and many people have an opinion on it. Some people wan animal testing to stop due to safety hazards and concerns for the animals, while others aren't so concerned about it, since testing it make it better for everyone. Animal testing used to be deemed necessary but not people can't be so sure. I personally believe that animal testing should continue and i will later state my reasons why. first, what exactly are the pros and cons of animal testing? Testing Animals has many good and bad reasons.…
Animal research is cruel. Animal also have their live, they also have heart, brain, and can breathe just like us. If the animal can talk they must curse and start a riot. Why we can’t let the animal and people equal? Animal just like us, humans are greedy selfish people. Animal also need love and warm, most animal are cute innocent creatures like bunnies. Why we need to do animal experiment? We need to let humans and animal fair, if you can’t I wanted to the government should be completely banned. They are living things just like us. In fact we are not much different from each other. Animals breathe, eat, sleep, and dream. We do to. They have family and friends and we do to.…
Us as humans have liberty freedom justice, choice etc. animals also have the right to live why should they be tested on they never did nothing to you god made them for a reason but not to be tested on. Is it right to take the freedom of an animal just because you want to research? No it’s not right to make them suffer for us or kill them.…
Imagine living inside a locked cage, having no control over any aspect of your life. You can’t choose your food, how your times spent, with who your times spent. Imagine sleeping in your own waste, filth and dirt. Imagine having your freedom and life taken away. Imagine your innocent self being forced to intake toxic chemicals, being poisoned, infected with drugs, burned and even cut. Did you do anything to deserve this cruel punishment? Well, neither have the animals tortured behind laboratory doors used for research and testing. These tests evaluate how toxic our consumer products may be. Other tests are for medical or physiological research. But Animal Testing isn’t just giving a mouse a pill to see what it does. It’s much more than that. Not only is Animal testing cruel, but with modern techniques it is completely unnecessary…
In addition, animal testing is cheap. There is a large supply of animals for medical research. Animals are easily bred and maintained safely in controlled labs. Rats and mice breed very quickly, meaning that the supply can be restocked quickly. The costs of testing on humans would be extremely high. More research can be done and at less expense than testing with humans, who may not only be in danger but would probably need to be highly compensated. Testing humans would be even more controversial than testing on animals because you would have to find a person who is willing to be tested on. If scientists did not use animals for animal testing, they would have to use humans for cosmetic, drug and chemical testing. In…
Thank you Madam Speaker, and good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. Today we are debating the motion: Animal testing should be banned. We, the government, strongly agree with the motion and have two reasons for this: uncertainty and expense.…
Animal testing can date back to the Ancient times of the Greeks and the Romans. Animal testing and its ethics have always been questioned and some of us as humans do not want to consider animals being on the same level as us. Just because an animal is not capable of speaking to us does not mean they don’t have feelings or that we’re not on the same level. If an animal’s baby was taken away from the mother she would be sad and hurt as would a human mother. Animals do not deserve to be hurt or tortured because scientists want to test products on them to deem them safe for human use.…