Ms. stewart
ERWC
4 December, 2012 Animal Experimentation
Is it wrong to experiment on animals for our own benefit? Many may disagree and believe its immoral and shouldnt be done. Science and manufacturing need animal experimentation to prevent harm to humans because it helps to develope cures for disease and to save humans from experimentation.
Animal rights activist oppose the use of animals for medical research arguing that it's cruel and immoral. The truth is some of the animals dont even suffer. Many people dont understand that because of animal testing many medical advancements have been made. Animal experimentation has created a safer environment for humans.
Millions of animals are used in biomedical experiments every year. Testing is used by scientist worldwide to find causes and treatments for thousands of medical conditions(2facts.com). Without animal testing causes and treatments to thousands of medical conditions would not be known. We would still live with polio if it wasn't for animal testing. Animal testing helped find the cures for polio, small pox, rabies, etc(2facts.com). If it wasn't for the monkey that was first injected with the polio disease the may never have been discovered. The injection was proven safe so it was used to save millions of lives.
If we ever want to find cures for major diseases.If diseases such as AIDS and cancer are ever to be cured resaerch on animals will have to continue(2facts.com). Deadly diseases are allways going to be around unless we continue to research on animals.With continuous research one day we may find a cure for a major illness. The FDA requires that all newly developed drugs to be tested on animals(2facts.com). This is in case any negative effects occur we will know before it is used on humans. If we want to improve in medical advancements animals are allways going to play a major role.
What would the world be like if humans were tested instead? If animal testing wasn't used we would live in a world were suffering would be common(2facts.com). The world would be chaos if humans were tested instead of animals. People would live in fear if that was the case. It would be unethical to try new treatments on humans without seeing how they are recieved by animals(2facts.com). You can't go directly from a test tube to a patient. Animals prevent us from being harmed by putting their lives on the line.
Many believe other testing methods should be performed. testing animals is the most accurate way to obtain results(2facts.com). Testing any other way wouldn't provide the same results. We are able to see the physical effects on an animal, on a computer we can't. Defenders of animal research say even the most advanced technology cant mimic the interactions(2facts.com) Computers aren't allways the most accurate way. If we test on animals it will further our understanding on human diseases. Organizations against animal testing believe otherwise.
Animal activist claim animals are indefensible and its morally wrong to take their lives. Organizations claim animals should be treated with the same respect accorded to humans(2facts.com). People claim that because animals are living beings like us, that we shouldn't take their lives. They claim their lives our just as valuable as ours. Animal activist argue it's cruel and poorly regulated(2facts.com). Organizations claim animals are mistreated and not taken care of. They say it's bad science and its not necessary.
It isn't completely true animals aren't harmed during testing. Laws are in place in the United States and in other countries(2facts.com). The laws prevent animals from being mistreated. Also it is made sure that steps are taken to ansthetize test subjects. In 1966 congress passed the Animal Welfare Act(2facts.com). It is the only Federal law in the United States that regulates the treatment of animals in research. The Animal Welfare Act requires that minimum standards of care and treatment be provided for certain animals. The government has made sure steps are taken to protect animals used for medical research.
Animal research will benefit society overall. Animals have helped find cures and will to if possible. It has also prevented us from using other humans for testing. People believe animals are mistreated and are forced to suffer but it isn't all true there are laws out there.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Not only does the research that we test on animals benefit humans, but it also really helps boost the world of medicine for the animals. Additionally, some of the medicines that we test for humans can be translated over to animals to help fight against the large number of animals that are dying from disease. Animals are very useful when it comes to research like this because they get to benefit from it to.…
- 1042 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Many people also think that animal research is an amazing practice. They might argue with counter arguments like, If humans never used animal for testing we wouldn't have cured many illnesses that had a devastating affect on humans. Many medical breakthrough would have never happened, like when scientist found a cure for polio. If scientist saved so many lives, why would people want to stop animal testing? It heartless that some people do not want to test on animals, do they want people to die? Scientist can go through many more amazing breakthroughs with the help of animals. The medical and scientific field can advance so much more with the help of couple animals. There are about 5 billion rats, so why does it matter that people use a couple? Yes, there have been medical breakthroughs with the help of animals, but that doesn't mean it will always be okay to do. Like stated before, 90% of experiments are a total fail! Why should animals die when scientist accomplish nothing? That means that scientist are just being ignorant, and they do not want to say that they have failed on a project. Poor animals are dying because these type of people do not stop after killing some animals, they keep on killing. Maybe animals are needed for some project, but not all for others. For example animals are not needed for cosmetics and other companies like that. For example, LUSH Cosmetics has over 900 stores! In all those 900 stores…
- 1064 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Animal experimentation saves lives and makes vaccines for diseases. But, millions of animals die for experimentation and it doesn’t work every time, even people die because of false information. Animals are important in their habitats and kingdoms. If people take them, then they can't do their jobs. Animal experimentation is not needed for us because of how many animals die for it and how many false procedures there are that also kill people.…
- 516 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Others believe that animal testing has “contributed to many lifesaving cures and treatments.” According to (Animal Testing) “The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals.” Some people are highley for animal testing for this reason. One believes that animals are the reason why we are still here today, just based on the fact that we could run experiments and learn new things. One also believes that there is no other way to test on a whole-body system besides humans. Some even say that animal testing is beneficial to the animals, thus saying that humans can help the animals when they experiment and test on…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
While some people are fortunate and do not have any medical condition others depend on animal testing to survive or to live a happier and healthier life. Life long injuries such as asthma, cancer, and blindness have been killing people, making them miserable, and unhappy. By following through with animal testing it allowed diseases to be understood and helped gain solutions to help human survivability. With the ability to test on animals these things have been cured or greatly reduces to help thousands upon millions of people. Overall people have greatly benefitted from animal testing as well as many are fortunate enough to go back to their regular lifestyles with the people they love and enjoy being around. While there will always be people who want to stop animal testing because they want the animals have the chance also; animal testing has been a blessing to people who never would have imagined of having a long, happy, active lifestyle which most definitely overpower the cons of animal testing. I do believe that some animals should be backed off of from testing such as horses, dogs, and monkeys since they are well loved by people. However using rats has made most of the discoveries and since rats are not the most liked animals, scientist should keep testing on them to make new discoveries. Animals should most definitely be used for the sole purpose of expanding the medical treatments and should be treated kindly not harshly or roughly handled. Since animal testing has given people a second chance in life pretty much, we need to be kind to the animals and know that they are not objects we are testing on they are alive and deserve to be treated with respect. Thanks to animal testing people can once again live a much more normal life at home or a place they find most comfortable rather than be stuck in a hospital for long periods of…
- 1538 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Animal testing also proves that some drugs and medication are either safe or unsafe. Animal research helps us find a cure to some deadly diseases. (Ian Murnaghan). They test new series of surgeries on animals and then it ends up…
- 540 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
On average, 26 million animals are tested every year for commercial and scientific testing in the United States. Animals are tested to develop cures and treatments, check safety of human designed products, and toxicity of medications. Research on living animals has been done since at least 500BC. Although animal testing is wrong - because it is cruel and humane - there is no need for testing on poor innocent creatures when there are alternative testing methods. 95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act. There are a few pros that are beneficial, but the cons outweigh the pros by a great deal.…
- 586 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
They say animal testing has contributed to many life saving cures and treatments. Experiments in which dogs had their pancreases removed led directly to the discovery of insulin, critical to saving the lives of diabetics. The polio vaccine, tested on animals, reduced the global occurrence of the disease from three hundred thousand cases in 1988 to two hundred cases in 2012(procon.org). Other people say it is cruel and inhumane for animals to be treated that way. They feel this way because animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process.…
- 538 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
According to The California Biomedical Research Association, for over one-hundred years, nearly every medical advancement was made possible by animal testing. It made the discovery of Insulin possible, which has proven to be absolutely crucial to the survival of diabetics, and, according to the World Health Association, animal testing has also led to the discovery of the polio vaccine which took the worldwide occurrence of polio from 350,000 cases in 1988 to just 223 cases in 2012. In addition to these life-changing advancements, animal testing also provided us with pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, anesthetics, organ transplants, and the list goes…
- 1013 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Medicines such as insulin, the polio vaccine, lithium, and penicillin were all tested on animals. After all humans share around 95% of genes with mice making them a prime test subject. Humans and animals also have similar organs which do either the same or slightly different functions. While the experiments seem harsh and inhumane the scientists have to follow strict laws to ensure the animal's well being worldwide. Most scientists use the “Three R’s” method. The Three Rs are Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement. Replacement is using non animal methods when animal use is not necessary. Reduction is using the fewest amount of animals possible for an experiment. Finally, Refinement is using the best way possible to reduce as much suffering as possible. Since 1901 almost every Nobel Laureate in Physiology or Medicine has used some form of animal research. The creator of the Polio vaccine Albert Sabin said “Without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year.” Vivisection helped create treatment for syphilis, malaria, smallpox, etc. It even helped scientists learn about tumors and brain disorders. While animal testing has several benefits not a lot of people are happy with how the animals have been treated during the…
- 612 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Animals have been used for testing for centuries and change has to happen for them. Many things are happening to animals as these things go on and on pain, sadness, and terrible living conditions. It is wrong for us to take animals like we own them and lock them up for our own uses (Animal Rights). The animals never have a release date so they are kept until they are useless or dead. Animal testing is morally wrong, and is causing death of animals. The animals all get stuck in poor conditions, terrible treatment, and even suffer from neglect (Animal Testing). "They feel pain and fear just as we do, and their overwhelming natural inclinations—like ours—are to be free and to protect their own lives, not to be locked in a small cage inside a laboratory,…
- 262 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Firstly, the use of animals for medical has helped immensely by: providing cure to some diseases, shows how a new medication affects the animal, and show how a disease affect an animal. In recent years there has been a few inventions that are trying to eliminate the use of animals, but these alternatives are limited and not reliable. A medication called Ganciclovir that treats people who are infected with HIV is a “life- saving drug… all this was define by prudent animal testing” (Corey) this is just one example of what good animal testing. Likewise, without the testing upon animal’s people would be taking this drug and others blindly unknowing of…
- 556 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
If we didn't test on animals we wouldn't know if a certain medicine is good for us or it doesn't work. The experiments are sometimes bad. For example, using animals for makeup, that's bad. We don't need makeup-.-. That's pretty much useless. The poor animals shouldn't suffer to make a woman pretty. -,-…
- 7091 Words
- 29 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Animal testing benefits human health. Medical research involving animals has dramatically improved the health of the human race over a significant period of time. Advances in antibiotics, insulin, and other drugs have been made possible through research done on animals. Despite these benefits, some people believe that animals should be not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. In order for scientists to create new drugs, that help cure diseases, they have to be able to test them. Scientists have found that many animals have similar physical processes to humans. Observing and examining how a new drug affects an animal makes it possible to find out how new drugs might affect the human body. Animal testing saves human lives. It would be wrong to test new drugs on humans. How many people would die because doctors could not administer medication before compiling all the information about a new drug? Conducted in a recent Monash survey, 99% of all active doctors in Australia stated that animal research has paved the way to many medical advancements. And 97% of doctors support the continuous use of animals for research. In that said, animal testing should only and with causation be continued for medical research, however it must not be used in cosmetic research as except for indecently torturing animals, and it is additionally acknowledged that animals used within medical research also endure these precautions, but it conveys a superficial and unrealistic image to many people at a inhumane price. In medical research, it provides a safe method for drug testing that in addition is easy to maintain.…
- 832 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Animals don't have most abilities that we do, but most humans can't do certain things either, "They can't read, do higher mathematics, build a bookcase or make baba ghanoush. Neither can many human beings, however, and yet we don't (and shouldn't) say that they (these humans) therefore have less inherent value, less of a right to be treated with respect, than do others" (Animal Rights: Do). Animals can't do most things that we can but that does not give us the right to treat them with disrespect and act like they have no value. Most of the Animals being used for research, are used for nothing because half of the time the results aren't valid, ¨Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses¨ (Animal Testing: Bad). So many animals a year are suffering from being used for research but like the article ¨Animal Testing: Bad¨ says, most of the experiments are not even relevant to human health and do not meaningly help…
- 878 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays