Preview

Animals and birds should never be kept in cages.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
487 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animals and birds should never be kept in cages.
Animal welfare has become a hot topic in recent years. Animal lovers have raised their voices many times to defend for the rights of their loved ones. The act of using animals as a commodity for human's purposes has been strongly criticized. Keeping them in cages is also included. While supporters believe that animals and birds should never be caged, I oppose that sometimes animals and birds should be caged for the following reasons.
Firstly, animals and birds bring considerable medical benefits such as bear gall and bird nest. According to scientists, bear bile contains ursodeoxycholic acid, which is believed to reduce fever, protect the liver, improve eyesight and break down gall stones. Meanwhile, edible bird nest is known to have anti-aging and immune-enhancing properties. Therefore, in such cases, they should be caged for experiments and researches, which then contribute to the medical development of mankind.
Secondly, captivity virtually brings them necessary safety at times as some kinds of birds will be protected from their predators once they are in cages. For instance, the baby birds can be easily killed by only one swift bite of the pet dogs, especially in spring and summer. To add on, red and gray squirrels are considered a great menace to the bird houses and the birds themselves. In the case of the chicken, some should be caged so that their eggs can be controlled for agricultural activities. Occasionally, when bird flu is widespread, chicken must be caged so that the disease can be managed so that no serious social impact will result.
On the other hand, the defenders argue that animals and birds should be given freedom. Cages will deprive them of their instinct features. They are unable to move about to search for the food and drink, create their own shelters and enjoy playing in their territories. All they do is sitting in the cages and eating the manufactured food their masters bring. For example, domesticated dogs become less aggressive and less

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We all humans know that animals do not like being kept in cages and in enclosed enclosures. “Animals are territorial. That is the key to their minds. Only a familiar territorial will allow them to fulfill the two relentless imperatives of the wild: the avoidance of enemies and the getting of food and water. So biologically sound zoo enclosure – whether cage, pit, moated island, corral, terrarium, aviary or aquarium- is just another territory…” “In a zoo, we do for animals what we have done for ourselves with houses…” Now he is comparing the animals’ cages to our homes! How is it possible to compare an animal’s cage to our houses? They are definitely vastly different. We cannot possibly compare a place like our home to an animal’s cage. Animals are meant to live in the wild - in the forests, the desserts etc. That’s their home. Like our homes are our habitats in cities and country sides. It’s not possible to call a cage, an animal’s territory; it’s like a jail for…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Foremost, the author tries to engage the reader to feel that locking chickens up in their cages is inhumane, through the use of inclusive language. This can be seen when the author mentions that “We believe, as humans, we are not only doing the animals an injustice when we mistreat them, but that we are also doing ourselves an injustice.” This quote elicits fear to the reader by making them feel as though if he or she opposes to this statement, they are not considered as humans or they would feel left out as they believe that they would be the only one who opposes to the issue. As a result of this effect on the reader, the reader will decide to agree with what the author said is correct, that is freeing chicken was a humane thing to do.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay, I’d like to argue against the general movement concerning animal rights. This movement aims to give animals more rights than is necessary. One of the main people who advocate this movement is Peter Singer. Singer uses many logical arguments that are reasoned and well thought out but are flawed and it will be very useful to show how the animal liberation movement is misguided and unrealistic.…

    • 2564 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The welfare of animals is a much spoken about topic, especially as the animals cannot talk about it themselves. It can be seen that our society worries too much about the welfare of animals but does not take enough action to protect these animals.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you feel if you were caged in and force fed? Animals, around the world, are being abused like that by many humans, every year. They are being chained up, their furs are being pulled straight off from their bodies, and they are being severely abused. Moreover, animal societies and the government started to take action to fight for animal rights. In the article Can Animal Rights Go Too Far?, Adam Cohen explains how animals are being treated and how they are sold to the market. Just like humans, animals have lives, too. They deserve better treatment and care. Therefore, the government should enhance making laws for animal rights, in addition to human rights.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last few years, the pressure to cage animals in zoos has led to animals losing their instincts, freedom, and behavior. The threats posed by the zookeepers are encouraging anti-zoo activists to push beyond early efforts such as sending zoo animals in the wild to keep them from being captive in zoos. Today, in the interest of keeping animals in their natural habitat, many anti-zoo activists are trying to change how people poorly treat animals. Although there are those that oppose to keeping animals in their natural habitat in the wild, anti-zoo activists should make every effort to send more animals in the wild because doing so will prevent animals from suffering, allow them to be free, and keep them remain in their own natural habitat.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What's Wrong With Zoos

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As humans inhabit more and more of the earth’s land, some species of wildlife are more likely to be found in captivity than in their natural habitat. But is that a good thing? Keeping animals captive might not be in our best interest. Caging theses animals up for zoo can be compared to imprisonment for animals. It makes profits for zoos and aquariums while these wild animals suffer. They take away from these animals being free, just so they can entertain humans. Lastly it takes away these the freedom of animals, preventing them from being truly what they are, and that is wild animals. So these animals shouldn't be captive to zoos and aquariums.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The last reason as to why placing animals in captivity is wrong is because it can damage them physically and mentally. The habitats in captivity are very different than the habitants out in the wild. In captivity, they are much smaller, and animals have much less freedom compared to the wild. Animals are also constantly being watched by people, which can stress them out. As a result, animals can be damaged mentally and physically.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal rights are a common altercation when looked at from a medical standpoint and from an equality view. Two authors construct essays discussing the opposing views of animal rights. The first author, Cohen, approaches the need of animal rights from a medical standpoint, while Regan addresses the morality of zoos and the equality of animals. Regan and Cohen differentiate animal rights by addressing the value and equality of animals in regards to animals testing and animal captivity. In this essay, Cohen and Regan’s arguments will both be addressed along with differences and similarities between the two arguments.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the first edition of Peter Singer’s book “Animal Liberation” in 1975 the animal rights movement has been a topic of discussion. This movement or the animal liberation movement is an effort designed to protect mammals from being mistreated and regarded as property by humans. Peter Singer is known as a Utilitarian and believes in maximizing individual happiness while minimizing nonhuman unhappiness. Singer claims that all human beings have the same worth as all nonhuman animals. Singer continued to argue that all animals are equal and the ethical principle on which human equality is based should be extended to animals. “Animal liberationists argue that cruelty towards animals and destruction of the environment arise from the human domination of nature” (Susan, 2007). There are two opposing stances to animal equality one being that animals should be treated with the same rights as humans because like humans they do have personalities and feelings. The opposite viewpoint is animals should not have the same rights…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outline For Animal Rights

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Rights Introduction Thesis: An animal should be given rights because the way they are currently being treated is unethical and it should be banned. These animals are victims of factory farming, they are being hunted, and they are being tested on in laboratories. II. Body Paragraph 1: The method of factory farming has contributed to the abuse that animals have been receiving for many of years. A. Supporting evidence: These animals are being overcrowded in cages with poor air quality and unnatural light patterns, tail docked without anesthesia, being forcibly bred, they are being abused by workers, and neglected if they are sick or nearly dying (ASPCA) or the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue of animal rights revolves around the question of whether animals should be given the same rights as humans. (“Animal Rights” Current issues: Macmillian Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 1 Nov. 2011) I feel that animals should be treated kindly but using animals in experiments for science and medicine can sometimes be very useful. Many people believe that animals lack the mental and spiritual qualities of humans.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is clear that animals in captivity aren't the most delighted. It turns out that while zoos have people believing that the animal is contented,they are not. Animals suffer mentally,physically,and emotionally. This being claimed,the captivity of animals should be abolished.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will examine animal rights from a utilitarians point of view. I will define the…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Captivity

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animals behind cages, starving and dying, it's an awful sight. I believe that animal captivity is bad for animals and that they should be running free and wild. wild animals in zoos suffer physically and mentally. Many animals in zoos show signs of distress such as pacing or rocking backwards and forwards repeatedly. Zoos do not save species from extinction but in some cases they can even make it worse.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics