Answer to Gun control
(1.) The controversial issue is about Pro-Gun lawmakers are open to limits on size of magazines.
(2) The issue is that some of the influential lawmakers in Republicans and Democrats parties believe that the proposed ban on assault weapons as politically poisonous. That there is difference between the size of magazine and assault weapons.
(2b)Some lawmakers agreed that if the ban on the size of 15-30 rounds devices that have been used in shootings rampages from Aurora, Tucson, Colorado, and Newtown, it could be less numbers of people killed.
(2c) the difficulties associated to the issue is that majority of republican lawmakers are not in support of the ban of assault weapons but in support of the ban of size of magazines.
(3) My position is for the ban of both size of magazines and assault weapons, the two are one and have the capacity of taking more lives than other single devices. But I don’t know the position of my other team members.
(4)
(5) The techniques to present and persuade our audience are through evidences that differentiate between Magazines and assault weapons and this is to prove beyond reasonable doubt with audible tone avoiding biases about realities of life in this issue.
(6) In order to persuade our audience, we must involve the audience in the conversation by asking some questions directly to the audience in order to put them at the state of those that lost their loved ones.
(7) Supportive evidences in research are those strong and solid propositions that can make the audience optimistic about the outcome of our communication to the audience.
(8) The individual that supported my position id Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords of Tucson who was directly victim of the last year (2012) mass shooting in Tucson
(2) The issue is that some of the influential lawmakers in Republicans and Democrats parties believe that the proposed ban on assault weapons as politically poisonous. That there is difference between the size of magazine and assault weapons.
(2b)Some lawmakers agreed that if the ban on the size of 15-30 rounds devices that have been used in shootings rampages from Aurora, Tucson, Colorado, and Newtown, it could be less numbers of people killed.
(2c) the difficulties associated to the issue is that majority of republican lawmakers are not in support of the ban of assault weapons but in support of the ban of size of magazines.
(3) My position is for the ban of both size of magazines and assault weapons, the two are one and have the capacity of taking more lives than other single devices. But I don’t know the position of my other team members.
(4)
(5) The techniques to present and persuade our audience are through evidences that differentiate between Magazines and assault weapons and this is to prove beyond reasonable doubt with audible tone avoiding biases about realities of life in this issue.
(6) In order to persuade our audience, we must involve the audience in the conversation by asking some questions directly to the audience in order to put them at the state of those that lost their loved ones.
(7) Supportive evidences in research are those strong and solid propositions that can make the audience optimistic about the outcome of our communication to the audience.
(8) The individual that supported my position id Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords of Tucson who was directly victim of the last year (2012) mass shooting in Tucson