Nevertheless, Scalia and the court agree on that it’s important to pay attention to the whole law, and not just parts of it when interpreting code §36B. Important to notice when looking at the different interpretations under code §36B,
SUMMARY OF ANTIONIN SCALIA’S DISSENT 3 is that Scalia says that the court nullifies the term “by the State.” That completely changes the outcome of how §36B is interpreted. Antonin Scalia’s dissent opinion argues important points of how the court, and himself interpret the Affordable Care Act differently. The main parts of the Affordable Care Act that Scalia, and the court interpret differently are state exchanges, and code §36B. Even though the Affordable Care Act didn’t have to be rewritten according to Scalia, the court did rewrite parts of