Preview

Anucha Brown Sanders Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
403 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anucha Brown Sanders Case Study
The issue: Plaintiff Anucha Brown Sanders is suing defendants MSG, Isiah Lord Thomas, and James Dolan, alleging that she was discriminated on the basis of her sex and terminated in retaliation for her sexual harassment complaint against MSG and Thomas. MSG counterclaimed against plaintiff for breach of fiduciary duty.

The rule: The rule is that, the faithless servant doctrine provides that an agent is obligated “to be loyal to his employer and is ‘prohibited from acting in any manner inconsistent with his agency or trust and is at all times bound to exercise the utmost good faith and loyalty in the performance of his duties.’’’’ The employer must show that the employee’s disloyal activity was related to the performance of his duties, in order
…show more content…
During her hiring process she signed papers that states, that during employment she can’t engage in activities that may impair her indipendnse or judgment or conflict with her responsibilities to MSG. She also signed a form stated that “public trust and confidence are the greatest assets held by MSG.” When Sanders became vice president her responsibilities included oversighting of the marketing and business operation budget. She got fired in 2006 and her total compensations for the five years of employement exceeded $1,100,000. After Brown Sanders filed the law suit, MSG obtained copies of her tax returns for 2000-2005. In her tax returnrn she had approximately $72,000 worth of Schedule C deducations for expenses of a “direct marketing.” This could indicate that she had her own business on the side while working for the Knicks or that she had illegally deducted personal expenses as business expense. She denied this cenerio stating that, this coul’ve been the accountants error and not a deliberate attempt to commit tax fraud. MSC counterclaimed against her for breach of fidutiary duty, stating that she had breached her duty by opening an outside business or by commiting tax fraud while working for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mr. Sanders Case Summary

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sanders and the Claimant’s biological brother, Jorge Villalobos were not privy to injuries that may have occurred on the job regarding the claimant’s back, hearing and eyes specifically on March 31, 2015. The claimant worked 20 years for Mr. Sanders’, and never provided a “specific date and time of when these (alleged) injuries occurred.” He claimed that there was no medical documentation to support the claim, other than an injury that occurred 5 years ago when the claimant fractured his right arm at a job site. Mr. Sander’s did not have any documentation regarding the claimants right arm injury.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    IDEA Project

    • 2219 Words
    • 9 Pages

    2. Sherika could write extra payroll and bonus checks for her and her husband, which could easily be done since Bernie was usually out of the office and she also had his signature on a rubber stamp. Sherika could set up a ghost employee as well as write other employees an extra payroll or bonus check for them and receive a kickback from that employee.…

    • 2219 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ms. Patt's Case Summary

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page

    Although Ms. Patt’s Complaint alleges that she has suffered injury due to Will Walter’s discriminatory conduct, her allegations…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff sued the defendants, claiming that she was sexually assaulted and beaten by hospital employees while she was hospitalized. The defendants were granted a dismissal of the case for non pros. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff failed to meet her requirement to file a certificate of merit within 60 days. As a result, the Court of Common Pleas,…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legal case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. is a sex discrimination case under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. “Title VII specifically forbids any employer to … discriminate with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment in any way that would deprive any individual of employment opportunity due to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” (Twomey, 2013, p. 397). In this case, Oncale claimed that he was being discriminated against in his workplace because of his sex. In reading the case online, Oncale was “was forcibly subjected to sex-related, humiliating actions against him … in the presence of the rest…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Wittenburg v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. (AEFA), Bonnie Wittenburg was an employee for AEFA in their Minneapolis office. The plaintiff was hired by the company in November of 1998 at the age of forty-six to serve as an Equity Research Analyst in AEFA's Equity Investment Department. During a reduction in force by the defendant in 2003, the plaintiff was terminated. In January of 2004, the plaintiff filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and received her Notice of Right to Sue on January 30, 2004. The plaintiff filed suit on February 13, 2004 alleging that she was discriminated and retaliated against by the defendant as a result of her age and gender. AEFA moved for a summary judgment.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gm520 Es Essay Example

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ms. Pollard was involuntarily transferred to a different environment, working in a warehouse surrounded by all men. Although she was transferred because she needed to be in an environment in which she would not be making so many personal calls, she never asked to be relocated to the warehouse. Being that Ms. Pollard could not report the events to her direct supervisor because he was involved in the incidents, she attempted to file an anonymous complaint online but the website was not working. Teddy’s needs to ensure that their website is working properly at all times in order to avoid this type of situation. The case states that Ms. Pollard’s supervisor (Steve King) rarely enforced any of Teddy’s rules to include smoking, horseplay, foul language and sexual harassment. This does not vie well for Teddy’s because he is already known for being a lenient boss. It does not mention that Steve King’s supervisor ever had a conversation with him regarding his leniency, which shows that Teddy’s was condoning it.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Ms. Deters, the plaintiff, sued Equifax, the defendant, in the United States District Court for the district of Kansas after being sexually harassed on several different occasions by three different co-workers and also the original male supervisor. Violating Title VII, prohibiting discrimination of employees based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. Ms. Deters filed multiple complaints on the daily sexual harassment that had taken place at the office. Mr. Taylor indicated he would handle the sexual harassment, him being the highest managerial position in the office. Mr. Taylor was also designated by Equifax to enact its human resource policies. The courts entry of judgment in the favor of the employee denied the defendants motion on the issue of punitive damages. However, Equifax did not agree with the decision of the court and wanted a judgment as a mater of law de novo. Equifax litigates that the evidence was not in support of the punitive damages.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the case of Hampton v. Snead State Community College (SSCC), the one element that Hampton failed to establish of a prima facie case of racial discrimination was the forth element in the case. The forth element in the case stated, “SSCC treated similarly situated employees outside of Hampton's protected class more favorably” (Hampton). According to the court, Hampton failed to establish the prima facie case of bring substantial evidence of employees of another race who were tried fairly. The plaintiff brought evidence of three colleagues, also coaches, who were White (Adam Rhoden, Steve Machen, and Gerry Ledbetter) who engaged in misconduct and were not demoted or transferred to another division. However, the first two coaches that Hampton supplied, as evidence to the court did not suffice because both coaches, Rhoden and Machen, incident involved another athletic director than whom the plaintiff was suing. The third coach involved in the evidence, Coach Ledbetter, was also deemed an insufficient example because Ledbetter’s misconduct was different than that of the plaintiff. Therefore, since the plaintiff was not able to cover the final element of a prima facie case of racial discrimination, the plaintiff request of summary judgment was denied.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Malika Curry, Aggrieved Party, (AP) alleged that she was discriminated against based on reprisal for a union grievance, Color and Disability as evidenced by the following:…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SOC 315 Week 5 DQs

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Search the Internet to find at least one news item about this lawsuit, preferably from a news source in the state in which the incident occurred.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawlinson’s perused her arguments that weight wasn’t an issue to perform the necessary job duties of a corrections officer because of her weight. Rawlinson’s filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleging sex discrimination. Rawlinson’s continue with a civil complaint filed by Southern Poverty Law Center and district complaint that’s known as a Supreme Court Case Dothard V. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977). Rawlinson had to prove Alabama violated Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964. According to the Title VII, it’s a women choice to work in all dangerous environment.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vaughn Case Brief

    • 3486 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Plaintiff-Appellant Emma S. Vaughn contests the judgment rendered in favor of defendant Texaco, Inc., dismissing with prejudice Vaughn's race and sex discrimination suit filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. Because the magistrate clearly erred in finding no racial discrimination, we reverse.…

    • 3486 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil Jury Trial Report

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Harz, appeared to be a Caucasian female in her late fifties. The plaintiff’s attorney, Michael J. Maggiano, appeared to be a Caucasian male in his sixties. The defendant’s attorney, Louis A. Ruprecht, appeared to be a Caucasian male in his sixties. The plaintiff, Vanessa Russy, is thirty-nine years old and appeared to be a Caucasian female. The defendant appeared to be a Caucasian male in his mid-forties. The plaintiff’s expert witness, Professor Kristin K. Kucsma, appeared to be a Caucasian female in her mid to late forties. The plaintiff’s expert witness appeared to be a Caucasian male in his sixties. Professor Kristin K.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Northville attorney Sarah Prescott has filed a federal lawsuit against the Bay View Association of the United Methodist Group on behalf of the Bay View Chautauqua Inclusiveness Group in Michigan. The suit alleges that the upscale community discriminates against people on the basis of religion and violatesthe federal Fair Housing Act, MLive relays.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays