Preview

Appeals Process Criminal Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1401 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Appeals Process Criminal Justice
Final Project: Appeals Process Paper University name here
Your name here
CJS/220
09/99/2012
Instructors name here

What is an appeal?

An appeal is a process which assists defendants from wrongful incarceration, (What are Appeal Courts for? 2004). An Appeal if successful allows the higher court to over-turn a lower court’s decision. An appeal is also a defendant’s way of challenging the court’s decision. In the Criminal Justice system, an appeal takes place when an offender “tried in court”, is found guilty, later sentenced or someone who is already convicted and incarcerated may be released from incarceration or a sentence vacated if the prison term has not commenced with a successful appeal. A sentence can be vacated via an appeal, or reduced even after the sentence has begun. In Federal court, the attorney or offender files a brief(s) in support of their motion 2255 to vacate the sentence. In Europe, they follow a different standard as follows: But it is as well to remember, for example, that while article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights,agreed in November 1950, guarantees you a fair trial, it does not guarantee you a right to appeal against the outcome of that trial. The right of appeal is to be found in article 2 of the Seventh Protocol to the Convention which was only agreed so 34 years later, in November 1984. So, even in the legal thinking of the modern world, appeals are something of an additional luxury, (What are Appeal Courts for?, 2004).

The following are permissible grounds for appeal. (a) The Commission relied on erroneous information, and the actual facts justify a different decision. (b) There was significant information in existence but not known to me at the time of the hearing, and a different decision would have resulted if the information had been presented. (c) The Commission made a procedural error in my case, and a different



References: ABC News 20/20 (2011) Retrieved from: http://abcnews.go.com/US/amanda-knox-trial-italian-murder-case/story?id=14576338#.T-c1V7V5GSo Church discipline (2010), Amanda Knox, retrieved from: http://church-discipline.blogspot.com/2010/12/amanda-knox.html Meyer, J. F., & Grant, D. R. (2003). The courts in our criminal justice system. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Mulherin (2012). Criminal Justice: What Are Intermediate Sanctions. Retrieved from: http://criminal-law.knoji.com/criminal-justice-what-are-intermediate-sanctions/ Valdosta daily times staff writer (2011) What we think, governor cannot stay an execution, Retrieved from: http://valdostadailytimes.com/opinion/x221223438/What-We-Think-Governor-cannot-stay-execution Walker (2012), Amanda Knox, retrieved from: http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/2012/06/17/cleared-convict-amanda-knox-plans-la-capanne-jail-visit-86908-23897184/ What are Appeal Courts for?. (2004). Otago Law Review, 10(4), 517-536.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Romeo phillion research

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Appeal refers to the appellant, sometimes called the plaintiff in error, must file a notice of appeal, along with the necessary documents, to commence appellate review. The person against whom the appeal is brought, the appellee, then files a brief in response to the appellant's allegations.(http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Appeal+(law) which means requesting a formal change to an official decision. In this case only one appeal had taken place.in 2009 Romeo Phillion sat through his first and last appeal. However, should this appeal even had taken place? The case was reopened in 2006, and in March 2009, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned his 1972 murder conviction and granted him a new trial, in part because a 1968 police report establishing a clear alibi for Phillion had not been turned over to his defence lawyer. (trial.http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/phillion/) due to the fact that Phillion was wrongfully accused he should not have even had an appeal.…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We use it today to appeal state convictions to the federal courts when a person who has been…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    10A2 UnitActivity 1

    • 664 Words
    • 4 Pages

    b. Restate the facts you quoted in task 1a, and state your opinion about their credibility.…

    • 664 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main and biggest issues with the standing appeals system is the time and resources it drains. The appeals system sees an unprecedented amount of nearly never-ending cases and does not have the judges, administrators, and lawyers to keep up with the constant hearings, paper-work, and proceedings that must take place. Almost 34% of all appeals are for offenders who claim total innocence (DeathPenalty.org) but the other 66% are either repeat with crimes and want an easy off, or are looking to plea out. Not only is this insufficient but a waste of valuable time that could be focused towards the reinstatement of rehabilitation programs and educational services that could help the amount of appeals lessen. Not only is this an issue in…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    See Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 735 (2001) (affirming dismissal of prisoner’s claim for failure to exhaust where he “never sought intermediate or full administrative review after prison authority denied relief”); Thomas v. Wollum, 337 F.3d 720, 726 (6th Cir. 2003) (noting that a prisoner must appeal administrative rulings “to the highest possible administrative level”); Gibbs v. Bureau of Prisons, 986 F.Supp. 941, 943-44 (D.Md. 1997) (dismissing a lawsuit for failure to exhaust, where a federal prisoner did not appeal his administrative claim through all four stages of the BOP’s grievance…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    M1 Custodial Care

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page

    Adjudications are formal procedures used in prisons which are like court hearings, but they are quicker and cost considerably less. The prisoner in the situation which is accused may been given legal advice. This would come from either prison staff or inmates, and they are known as your McKenzie friend. These Adjudications are put into process when an offence has taken place inside the prison involving inmates. For example offences would be things such as possession of contraband or physical assault towards another inmate, or a visitor. Depending on the severity of the situation there a different repercussions for their actions. They can have their privileges taken away, whether it is some of them or all of them. This would be things like, time out of their cell or in cell televisions. They could also have their wage for work lowered or stripped completely. This also depends on the scale of their actions. If what the accused has done is a large problem then they could have an extension put onto their sentence. The maximum for this is 42 days.…

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2nd exam notes

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Type 2 – reverse (trial court made a mistake) and remand (sent back to trial court)…

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Saints Bounty Scandal

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    D. The scandal is a serious situation that not only subjected athletes to an increased risk of injury, but also has had a negative impact on young athletes and the perception of the National Football League.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court, Trials, and Sentencing: Due Process is a documentary explaining the court system within the criminal justice system. The American legal system is adversarial with two parties, the defense and the prosecution, working to prove to the jury their side is right. Overall the process of going through the court system is long and drawn out in order to make sure the person is guilty. From the initial charging to sentencing and appealing, there are a lot of steps the defendant needs to go through. This can be beneficial to the accused because it makes sure that they are guilty, but it also puts a burden on the community because of the time and money that needs to be spent on each individual case.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (1) the magistrate who issued the warrant relied on information supplied by an affiant who knew that the statements in the document were false or who recklessly disregarded the truth;…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For an example. Let’s say a federal officer wants to strip search you. That person has done nothing wrong, but the police officer disagrees and says he needs to strip that person to prove it. Under the criminal justice system, you get to bring that argument to a judge, who will issue a ruling only after listening to the government’s reasons for wanting to strip search you and your reasons for why they shouldn’t be allowed to do that. In the event that the judge rules against you and finds that the police officer has probable cause to search you, not only do you have a right to appeal that judge’s decision all the way to the Supreme Court, you are welcome to talk to as many reporters, friends, relatives, and elected officials as you want to…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Offenders

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Grounds of appeal can be - new evidence - legal precedence, such as when an expert witness is proven to be wrong in his procedure…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeal Process

    • 816 Words
    • 2 Pages

    October 26, 2014 Appeal Process Paper When any defendant is found guilty, of any charge, is entitled to an appeal to at least one level of appellate court (Meyer, J Grant, D. 2003). An appeal is when a defendant has already been found guilty in court, and they decide to take it to a higher court in order to change the ruling (Meyer, J Grant, D. 2003). Basically it is a process that takes place, because the defendant and their attorney do not feel that the verdict given was accurate and that could be due to many different reasons. Appeals ensure that there was a fair trial given and no rights were violated (Meyer, J Grant, D. 2003). The appeal process begins very shortly after the trial, when the defense sends an appeal to the court. Appeals factor in to the overall criminal justice process, because in the end they can change laws or amendments. The Miranda rights are a great example of this. They came about after someone went back and challenged the court. It was then that the Miranda rights became part of the law and the criminal justice process. Just because a criminal goes to court and is decided guilty and is charged with whatever he/she was being charged with, does not mean that the process is over and he/she accepts the sentence and it is done. The defendant may decide something went wrong or he/she has a way of proving their innocence. Then they will submit an appeal and may ended up getting out of the original sentence given. This completely changes up the criminal procedures and processes. Based on my review of the appeal courts results in New Jersey, I think that the current appeals process is very effective. As per New Jersey Judiciary annual Report 2011- 2012 (n.d.), 6,461 appeals were received and 6,159 of those appeals have been decided. (Appellate Division of Superior Court). Mostly everyone appeal submitted to the New Jersey Appellate Courts has been resolved, therefore showing that the defendants are given a chance to have their case heard once…

    • 816 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trial Process

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The criminal trial process is a vital part of the criminal justice system in NSW as it plays a fundamental role in achieving justice, by determining the innocence or guilt of an offender. Yet, despite the criminal trial process still having many complex issues that remove it of achieving its full means of justice, the process has stood the test of time and lasted for more than two centuries. It aims at lawfully and justly providing victims, offenders and society with the rights of a fair trial. The hierarchies of courts play a crucial role in effectuating justice for the community. The courts jurisdiction is the extent of the court’s authority and is often determined by the hierarchy. The lowest form of court is the Local Court. The Local Court Act 1982 (NSW) outlines the offences that are heard in this court. They are less serious crimes, where matters are tried summarily, but are also the location for bail and committal hearings, where police play a prominent role in achieving justice. The Intermediate and High Courts handle indictable crimes as well as appeals from lower courts. It is in these courts that a decision made sets a doctrine of precedent. The court hierarchy is a major part of the criminal trial process as it allows appeals and precedents to flow easily. It attempts to ensure consistency between judicial decisions, as well as limit the discretion on most judicial verdicts. Appeals and precedents fundamentally ensure efficiency and the effectiveness of achieving justice, but despite them being an effective measure in achieving justice, there are still cheaper and more cost-efficient methods, such as YJC, and Circle Sentencing, that can fulfill the same outcome. The cornerstone of Australia’s criminal trial process is the Adversary System. This refers to the legal procedure where two opposing sides argue a case before an independent, third party eg.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The judges making these decisions are appointed by the federal government. Individuals who apply for an appeal court position without any prior judicial experience, have their applications vetted by a screening committee composed of legal members, lay members and, more recently, a police officer. Candidates are evaluated on their professional qualifications ~including awareness of racial and gender issues! and personal characteristics and then “recommended” or “not recommended” to the Minister of Justice who retains full discretion to choose among candidates. The majority of candidates are promoted from a lower court and do not go through the committee process at this stage.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics