Preview

The approach the Zimbabwean courts take towards the question of damages in breach of contract cases.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1757 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The approach the Zimbabwean courts take towards the question of damages in breach of contract cases.
INTRODUCTION

A contract (according to Gibson 1997) is a lawful agreement made between two or more persons within the limits of their contractual capacity, with the serious intention of creating a legal obligation, communicating such intention, without vagueness, each to the other and being of the same mind as to the subject matter, to perform positive or negative acts which are possible of performance.

Contracting parties through agreement, breach and operation of law can terminate contractual agreements. This paper will focus on termination of contracts through breach. Breach of a contract involves conducts, which are inconsistent with proper performance of the agreement. It is a violation of a material fact of the agreement. The material fact breached should go to the root of the contract.

In Zimbabwe, the main remedies available for a breach or threatened breach are; specific performance, cancellation, interdict and damages. The Zimbabwean law unlike the English law allows or permits the plaintiff to choose his remedies provided he does not want to just enrich himself. Further, the plaintiff should not endeavor to enforce two inconsistent remedies.

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE

This is enforcement or calling of enforcement of the exact performance by the injured party to a contract. Our law does not allow a party in breach of a contract to rid their default by paying damages but, allows the injured party to demand specific performance, which however, is subject to the discretion of the court as was decided in Farmers' Co-operative Society v Berry 1912.

CANCELLATION

When there is breach going to the root of the contract the other party is entitled to cancel the contract. The injured party must elect within reasonable time whether to cancel or enforce the contract.

INTERDICT

It is a prohibitory order of the court that prohibits a specified act or acts. It makes it mandatory for the concerned party to obtain from doing what has been mentioned in the order. The



References: 1. Butterworths Digital Library, Zimbabwe Law Reports. 2. Volpe Peter, Commercial Law of Zimbabwe 3. Christie R. H, Business Law in Zimbabwe

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bus311 Business Law I

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In this paper, I will reflect on the operation of contracts. Business law shows how contracts may be classified in several ways depending on the manner in which they are created, expressed, or performed. I have learned a lot from this course and I will use that to help write this paper. In the following paper I will discuss the oral or written contracts; I will discuss express or implied contracts, and will discuss formal or simple contracts. I will also discuss the impact of the contracts in a business and show the true propose of contracts. I will show what is needed in a contract to be legally enforceable. I will discuss how a contract must contain the following six elements: an offer and acceptances, a mutual agreement, a consideration, a competent parties, and legality of purpose, and proper form. All of this will be discussed in depth in the following paper.…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A valid contract is “breached,” or broken, when one of the parties fails to fulfill the terms of the contract. The party harmed by the failure of the other party to comply with the contract may sue for breach of contract. Most states require that the injured party file a breach of contract lawsuit within a specified period of time, referred to as the statute of limitations. A sample court filing related to a breach of contract can be seen in Example A.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Breach of contract is the nonperformance of a contractual duty. The breach is material when performance is not at least substantial. If there is a material breach, then the non-breaching party is excused from the performance of contractual duties and can sue from damages resulting from the breach. (Clarkson, Miller and Cross, Business Law Text and Cases, page 324).…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A breach of contract occurs when a party’s duty to perform under a contract is absolute, and that party fails to perform. The duty can be absolute because it was not conditional in the first place; any conditions were either excused or fulfilled; or the duty was not discharged.…

    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    PRETEST 2

    • 702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ____ is a remedy requiring a breaching party to carry out the terms of the contract.…

    • 702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    D2 Unit 21 2

    • 3044 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For the injured party within a breached contract to claim for remedies whether it was agreed on at the time of writing the contract or an decided at a later time, both the injured party and the other party (e.g. a business and a customer) will have to go to court to decide what kind of remedy will occur to the injured party fairly to the proportion to the damaged done.…

    • 3044 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rules--- according to review the textbook, we could list some of law and concept to discuss this case, such as Privity of contract, Bilateral contract, Revocation of offer by offeror, condition, anticipatory repudiation, remedy and compensatory damage.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 14 P6

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page

    All consequences of the breach of the condition are deemed to be sufficiently serious to justify termination. The buyer cannot terminate the contract if the non-conformity is a minor defect and slight breach. Slight breach is treated as a breach of warranty in the business sales contract. Slight breach is the breach when the conse-quences of breach do not go to the root of the contract or detriment the purpose of the contract. If the buyer accepts the goods there is no right of termination because termi-nation remedy required…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greenbik Case

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Common remedies for breach of contravention includes but is not limited to pecuniary penalties , damages and divesture . In some circumstances, non-punitive orders may be imposed.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Little Legal Analysis

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Conditions, Mogul broken the contract and deprived Horatio of substantial benefit, so it’s treated as a condition.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the realm of contract law there are many ways of addressing breach of contract. The purpose of this paper is to analyze four separate scenarios and decide if the remedy of specific performance would be applicable to any of them. Specific performance is, “An extraordinary equitable remedy that compels a party to execute a contract according to the precise terms agreed upon or to execute it substantially so that, under the circumstances, justice will be done between the parties.” (retrieved September 7, 2013, from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Specific+performance) Or, to put it succinctly, the court will order the contract to be fulfilled as written, with no damages…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Legal Sufficiency 1. Adequacy 2. Unilateral Contracts 3. Bilateral Contracts 4. Illusory Promises a. Output and Requirement Contracts b. Exclusive Dealing Contracts c. Conditional Promises 5. Pre-existing Obligation a. Modification of a Pre-existing Contract b. Substituted Contracts c. Settlement of a Undisputed Debt d. Settlement of an Disputed Debt B. Bargained-For-Exchange 1. Past Consideration 2. Third Parties C. Contracts without Consideration 1. Promises to Perform Prior Unenforceable Obligations a. Promise to Pay Debt Barred by the Statute of Limitations b. Promise to Pay Debt Discharged in Bankruptcy c. Voidable Promises d. Moral Obligation 2. Promissory Estoppel 3. Contracts under Seal 4. Promises Made Enforceable by Statute a. Contract Modifications b. Renunciations c. Firm Offers…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal remedy, for example, would be damages for a breach of contract. Under the law, a person who is party to a contract can recover damages if the other person breaches. The damages are equal to the actual damages or loss he experienced as a result of the breach of contract. The law stipulates that this is the appropriate remedy.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unless terminated as provided herein, This Agreement shall extend to and terminate upon completion of Provider’s Work as provided herein. Client may terminate this Agreement without cause. In the event of termination without cause, Client agrees to pay Provider for all of Provider’s Work up to the date of termination. Either party may terminate this agreement for material breach, provided, however, that the terminating party has given the other party at least seven days written notice of and the opportunity to cure the breach.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legislation to combat unfair terms was first passed in the 19th century. Until 1994 the controls centred on clauses which exclude or limit liability; the principal Act is now The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA). However, in 1993 the European Council of Ministers passed a Directive on Unfair Terms on Consumer Contracts[1] which applies (with limited exceptions) to unfair terms of any type in consumer contracts. The Directive was implemented in the UK by Regulations made under European Communities Act 1972; these have now been superseded by the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (UTCCR)[2]. The Regulations did not amend or repeal UCTA; they provide an additional set of controls. The resulting structure is complex and proposals have been made to simplify it by combining the two sets of rules into a single one, modified legislative scheme[3]. The Regulations operates side by side with UCTA, so that is possible for a term to be valid under the Regulations and not the Act, and conversely. Or, to put the same point in another way, a party wishing to rely on a contract term will have to satisfy to both requirements of both sets of rules. The scope of the Regulations, however, differs significantly from that of the Act, so that often only one set of rules will apply[4].…

    • 3573 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays