Preview

Approaching Fury Perceptions

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
628 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Approaching Fury Perceptions
35585
APUSH
Mr. Steere
15 November 2011
Approaching Fury
Henry Clay: Henry Clay had very complicated beliefs when it came to slavery. He believed that it should be eradicated from the face of the earth, but at the same time, he owned slaves himself. Clay said that because of the current state of the economy of the United States, slavery was a necessary evil, but should nevertheless be removed from society. Later in his life, Clay had bought sixty slaves to serve in the fields of his plantation, Ashland. Clay said that "I need a large labor force to till my lands, and the slave market is the only place I can get it." While he was a slave owner, Clay still tried to make life as bearable as possible for his slaves. He treated them well and in some cases released them for faithful service. He was not afraid to discipline slaves who had misbehaved, but he treated his slaves so well that very few tried to escape. Clay was the Speaker of the House when the Missouri Compromise was written. At that point in his career, Clay believed that gradual emancipation would succeed in every slave state in the union. Therefore, Clay supported the Missouri Compromise because he thought that Missouri would eventually adopt a policy of gradual emancipation, and slavery would be eradicated from the United States. Unfortunately, this was not the case. Clay believed that slavery, if left alone, would rip white society apart. He was afraid that the United states would fall apart if both slavery and free blacks remained in America, and that the American System would never succeed in such a country. As a solution to those problems, Clay and a few other philanthropists founded the American Colonization Society. The Society was designed to send freed blacks to the lands of their fathers in Africa. The Society wanted to rid the country of slavery, and saw a way to do so by removing slaves from America as they were emancipated. Clay believed that states would be more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    b. Did he think that the Missouri Compromise resolved the controversy surrounding Missouri 's admission to the Union? Why or why not?…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clay's Compromise Clay’s Compromise was a response to the Force Bill. The compromise entailed a new tariff that slowly decreased the tariff. This caused of states that claimed nullification to back down and the United States avoided a large scale skirmish.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The intent of the Missouri Compromise was to solve the problem of unequal representation between slave and free states in the Union and, hopefully, bring peace between the North and South.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson became one of the wealthiest men in America through the “ownership of land and slaves”(Takaki 56). The value of slaves and land doubled in approximately twenty years due to the “multiplication of [his] slaves...the extension of culture, and increased demands for lands”(Takaki 56). The main source of Thomas Jefferson’s wealth was derived from being an active slaveholder and landowner.…

    • 2363 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, the internal opposition began with the strong anti-slavery movement that grew as a result of efforts by abolitionists. Over time, support for emancipation was garnering steadily and quickly, however, this meant that the conflict between slave and free states continued to rise as well. Because of this, the Mexican American war only escalated the high tensions; the question of what was to be done with the possible acquisition of an extremely large territory was posed, in regards to the balance of slave and free states. Abolitionist saw that the war posed an extreme threat to this balance, and would only expand slavery to the land that would be acquired. Henry Clay, a senator, expressed his view that was very similar to those who…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “At an early age, Jefferson concluded that slavery was wrong. To his credit, he attempted to denounce slavery or at least the slave trade in the Declaration of Independence. It appears that while Jefferson opposed slavery in principle, he saw no obvious way to end it once it became established. If the slaves were freed all at once, Jefferson feared that white prejudice and black bitterness would result in a war of extermination that the whites would win. He fretted that if slaves were individually emancipated they would have nowhere to go and no means to survive on their own. Of course, Jefferson along with most other Southern plantation owners were also economically dependent on slave labor. The best Jefferson could come up with was a plan to take slave children from their parents and put them in schools to be educated and taught a trade at public expense. Upon becoming adults, they would be transported to a colony somewhere and given tools and work animals to start a new life as a free and independent…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jefferson and His Slaves Thomas Jefferson our President, put in the Constitution that "all men are created equal." Before, while, and after he wrote this, he owned more than 400 slaves. He said he wanted slavery to be abolished, but he has put no action into his words. He believes slavery is the biggest threat to the new America, and that slavery contradicts the laws of nature. Receiving 175 slaves from his inheritance, Jefferson has only freed seven of his slaves.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since he was a child, Henry Clay displayed a proficiency for law, and accordingly attempted to fight for his beliefs of American freedom through politics and the government. These tactics can be seen in Clay’s fight to abolish slavery, as he helped establish the American Colonization Society to fight for an end to slavery, and even becomes its first president. One can see similar tactics in Clay’s defending of his other beliefs. For example, in an effort to keep the Union united, Clay used his competence for law and politics to broker many important compromises between conflicting parties, and he even earned the nickname the “Great Pacificator”. Additionally, Clay even founded a political party, the Whigs, which had similar beliefs to his own, in order to defend his beliefs and goals. Clay also strongly believed in America having economic freedom and security by being self-sufficient, and accordingly used his tactics of politically fighting for his beliefs by passing many tariffs and increasing funding in infrastructure to bolster the American System, an economic plan centered around American industry. While Henry Clay used politics and the government to defend his beliefs, Denmark Vesey resorted to violence and uprisings to achieve his freedom goals. After purchasing his freedom, Vesey began to plan a revolt with a few other slaves. As a preacher, Vesey was able to recruit enough slaves for the revolt to be effective, and news of the plan was said to be spread among thousands of blacks in the area. Unfortunately for him, Vesey was arrested before he was able to launch the revolt, resulting in his execution, but his failed uprising nonetheless depicts the contrasting tactics between Henry Clay and Denmark Vesey in attempting to achieve their freedom…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Shelby, the first master of Uncle Tom, was generally kind and treated his slaves well. To Mr. Shelby, if the situation of him was not that urgent since he was involved in economic crisis, he would not sell any of his slaves. When Haley, the slave trader, came and discussed with him about the slaves who were being sold, Mr. Shelby did not show a friendly attitude to Haley. Even when they finally came to an agreement, Mr. Shelby still insisted that Haley should find a good master for Tom. However, Mr. Shelby was a specific character of Southern plantation owners. He believed that slaves were commodities. He was generally used to slavery.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was implicitly repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, submitted to Congress by Stephen A. Douglas in January 1854. The Act opened Kansas Territory and Nebraska Territory to slavery and future admission of slave states by allowing white male settlers in those territories to determine through "popular sovereignty" whether they would allow slavery within each territory. Thus, the Kansas-Nebraska Act effectively undermined the prohibition on slavery in territory north of 36°30′ latitude which had been established by the Missouri Compromise. This change was viewed by Free Soilers and many abolitionist Northerners as an aggressive, expansionist maneuver by the slave-owning South, and led to the creation of the Republican Party.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of slavery to paradoxically define American freedom is first shown by the use of Jefferson, the “slaveholding spokesman of freedom”(Morgan). His attitude toward slavery can be shown in two ways. The first of which is debt. Debt is a force that can hold down any free man and this was why Jefferson hated debt so much. As a planter, he was basically forced into debt and resisted giving up his slaves until he found his freedom from that debt. He did not care about the freedom of his slavery as he did for his own. Jefferson also stated that a nation would be very fertile for tyranny if the men of a nation did not have enough land or money to support their families. This is paradoxical because the slaves live in a world of tyranny where the master is there monarch and the slave has no land or money to support their families. His second dislike was artisans. He stated that they lived dependent lives because they were dependent on the customer and had no other business or land to fall back on. Jefferson, on the other hand, liked farmers because they were very independent and always had a source of income. Jefferson states “the man who depended on another for his loving could never be truly free” (Morgan). This shows that Jefferson is willing to fight for the artisans who are dependent but does not want to forgo his slaves. Although freedom was rising for those who were dependent on others, the same dependent slaves had no improvements in liberty.…

    • 670 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    compromise of 1850

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The U.S senator, Henry Clay, was determined to take care of all these disputes. He, as well as other men like Daniel Webster and John Calhoun, sat down and debated a compromise that could resolve all these issue. The compromise became know as the Compromise of 1850.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abraham Lincoln is known as "The Great Emancipator" who freed the slaves. Yet in the early part of his career and even in the early stages of his presidency, Lincoln had no objection to slavery where it already existed, namely, in the Southern states. As a savvy politician, he always wanted to maintain the union, and he would use any device to keep the country together. However, his views on slavery evolved during his presidency, and the personal opposition towards slavery that he claimed he always had began to show through in his policy. As Lincoln noted in 1864, "I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel" (Lorence 306). Despite such strongly worded beliefs, Lincoln policies towards slavery often shifted for the sake of political expedience. For example, he pledged that states would be compensated for their loss of property as a result of emancipation to keep the border states from seceding. Still, by 1862 Lincoln had become firm in his convictions that slavery must be abolished. He even pressed for a constitutional amendment to ensure freedom to all the slaves. Lincoln espoused strong anti-slavery views, but he often put what he viewed as the good of the country ahead of the cause. Despite many detours along the way, he proved himself to be "The Great Emancipator." As a self-made politician from humble origins, Lincoln struggled in his early political life to define his identity. He described his childhood as "The short and simple annals of the poor. That's my life, and that's all you or any one else can make of it" (Oates 4). Lincoln felt extremely embarrassed about his background and worked his entire life to overcome the limitations he faced. He made himself a "literate and professional man who commanded the respect of his colleagues" (Oates 4). It is difficult to assess Lincoln's early views on slavery and race because they were constantly changing in an effort to achieve such…

    • 2258 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Shelby is Uncle Tom’s first owner. When Uncle Tom is his slave, he and his wife live relatively much happier life. Not like other slave owners at that time, Mr. Shelby is kind and treats his slaves good. In the very first Chapter of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Mr. Shelby and Negro trader Haley have a talk. This talk gives audience a sense that Mr. Shelby might sell some slaves. “‘I’ll think the matter over, and talk with my wife’, said Mr. Shelby” (Chapter I, 9). In Chapter V, even with Mrs. Shelby’s objection, Uncle Tom and Eliza’s son, Harry, are decided to be sold to pay Mr. Shelby’s debt. Even Mr. Shelby treats his slaves well, he still hypocritically participates slavery.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    structural assembly to relay a compelling and complex plot to his readers. Faulkner often uses incoherent and irrational phrases to bring the reader into the minds of the characters. With a believable plot, convincing characterization and important literary devices, William Faulkner is able to bring into perspective a new structural form of writing which influences the significance of the content within the novel. Faulkner does not use the typical writing style of most other authors, whereas to include the basic plot outline (including rising action and a climax), but instead pieces the story together providing small portions of the Compson Family history at a time. The majority of the readers of The Sound and the Fury are quick to note the scrambled botch of ideas and statements that the reader is faced with in the first section of the novel. The second narration is slightly more logical but again contains vague concepts. However, once the reader has become familiar with Faulkner's technique, a more in depth look can be taken into the relationships between the characters of the Compson family. The parallelism of the complex structure and other literary attributes throughout all of the sections of The Sound and the Fury are developed by looking at the relationships between the contrasting points of view as well as main characters, and the varying levels of consciousness of Benjy and Quentin.…

    • 3222 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays