Beforehand GM crops in the United States and United Kingdom were being produced without the hesitation of safety concerns. As with any new technology, once negativity is establish fear ensues. Soon after the relationship between food and disease was highlighted and safety concerns of GMOs was placed in the forefront of GM foods and its production and commercialization. With GMOs now highlighted in the public’s eye, media began to report myths and various facts of GM foods which ruined the perception of safety in GM foods. Moral and Ethical Considerations Quality of Life With governments allowing companies and scientist to genetically modify organisms in their own mind they are helping change and speed up the agricultural cycle.…
GMO crops face a lot of criticism, but the facts are that they are more environmentally friendly than traditional crops, they have higher and more stable yields than traditional crops, and are safe to consume. Some critics claim that GMO crops are unsafe and offer no significant advantages over traditional ones. This however, is not true. GMO crops are as safe as and more effective than traditional crops in every way.…
The risks to our health and exposed for using genetically modified crops or plants have not been yet proven because we are too early in the game of this genetically modification and engineering process. Thinking that this is a small solution to our problem for hunger and feeding Americans, then maybe they are just creating more problems that may not have solutions for in the future. However, the US National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine, states otherwise. In a new report that details how genetically modified organisms are apparently safe for human consumption and surprisingly, also have significant benefits for human health and the environment(FDA.org). They base their findings on an intensive and detailed report with past studies about GMOs. The many interviews with scientists, researchers and field experts that have data stating that they are not bad for one’s health. This helps determine whether it is good or bad for the health when it comes to eating genetical modified foods. They even have a new study that suggests that when crops are being engineered to improve human health, by altered to produce more vitamins or nutrients. This might be one good side of it, but why should we playing with mother nature? This is a big gamble we are…
Biotech food corporations have patented a number of genetically altered food and pharmaceutical crops that can only be grown with a proper license and new seeds must be purchased each year. Regrettably genetically engineered crops cannot be contained. Over the years Monsanto has sued hundreds of farmers for patent infringements and many of these farmers have been driven into bankruptcy and have lost everything. Farmer Percy Schmeiser refused to give in, Schmeiser had been in the farming business and developing his own seeds for fifty years, then had his fields carelessly contaminated by Monsanto, when this happened the company tried to take his land and his livelihood. Schmeiser stated, “I never put those plants on my land. The question is where do Monsanto’s rights end and mine begin?” The case went before the Federal Court of Canada, where Schmeiser accused Monsanto of trespassing, improperly obtaining samples of his seed from a local seed plant, and contamination of his crops with unwanted GM plants. In 2008 Monsanto settled out of court, agreed to pay all clean-up costs and agreed that Monsanto may be sued for recontamination if it happens again, also that Schmeiser would not be under a gag order which had been the norm. In this case, Monsanto’s patent was deemed valid; however Schmeiser was not forced to pay for the ‘privilege’ of the contamination. Even more recently Riceland Foods one of the largest rice cooperative in the U.S. won their lawsuit against Bayer when its natural long grain rice was contaminated with Bayer’s unapproved genetically engineered rice. Bayer was also ordered to pay a dozen farmers nearly $50 million for contaminating the commercial market that damaged rice prices back on 2006. (Dr. Mercola, 2012) These companies are trying to convince us these are safe reliable methods of feeding billions and making us healthier, and that they are benefiting us in the long run and if that’s true then they should have these patents, but are they?…
One of the main reasons that GMOs are so dangerous to us is that most of us aren’t fully educated on the subject. The growth and development of this technology has been so rapid and the concept is still so new to us, that we aren’t fully aware of what its long term side-effects and consequences may be. The resulting GM foods have undergone little or no long-term safety testing. The authorities are so blinded by the millions of profits that they have neglected all the risks associated with it. Nowadays, almost everything we buy at local grocery stores are somehow related to GMOs. I.e. fruits and vegetables such as banana, apples, papaya, (for longer shelf life and “presumably” greater potential yield**) etc; they’re found in soy products and corn (presumably better protection again pests); and the most devious of them all, they’re sometimes even found in dairy products as they’re often hidden in animal feed –…
The producers of the GM foods, like Monsanto Company, think people should popularize the GM foods, because they are the solution of global hunger. However, some scientists claim that GM foods are dangerous and we should be careful about them. In my view, GM foods have the unpredictable hazard to environment and human health. We should listen…
There are no linked cases between consumption of products containing GMOs, and disease. Regardless of your view on monopolization and large corporations’ illicit actions, genetically modified organisms aren’t the enemy. Those who control the organisms, are. A seed resistant to Roundup weed killer isn’t dangerous unto itself. An owner with no conscience and wide-reaching hands, is. Monsanto company needs to be controlled, but that is inconsequential to the long-term effects of its herbicide resistant seeds. The battles being waged against GMOs and particular hormone injections are plenty. Many being fought by those with good intents. Nobody, except maybe Monsanto, wants to see people suffer, for their own minor gain. It is unlikely those fighting the fight against use of GMOs in everyday groceries are out to see the downfall of the consumers’ health. It’s more likely to seek the downfall of companies like Monsanto. However, by fighting against the use, one keeps the everyday consumer from participating in potentially sustainable…
My opinion on GMOs is bias. I say that GMOs are good because they food is made and delivered quicker because if we the world was extremely against GMOs then the food you bought would last as long. Therefore if you look more into this the world could starve for how much time people would wait for the normal fruit/vegetable to delivered. Also if you were waiting for the food you ordered you wouldn't get as much of an amount than when the fruit had been through a process with GMOs.…
A topic of controversy in the past couple of years has been genetically modified organisms or GMOs for short. Many people disagree on whether or not GMOs benefit or threatens society and whether or not they are actually harmful to the human body. In this essay, I will delve into the both sides of the argument as well as what exactly GMOs are.…
The concern regarding GMOs is understandable. The world is changing and everything humans use and consume have a consequence. However, to assume that GMOs are naturally bad is a naive and uninformed opinion. GMOs are revolutionizing the world and must be allowed an unbiased chance in consumer markets. After all, many of the cures and inventions we take for granted today were surrounded by controversy and paranoia in their early days, similarly to GMOs…
The two articles I have chosen are both peer-reviewed and have two different opinions about GMO’s. The first article, titled “GMO’s and Global Justice” by Kristian Toft, is against the use of GMO’s, explaining how they are bad for us as human beings and for our environment. Her biggest concern is that we do not know the extent of what these genetically modified foods are doing to our bodies because of the lack of long-term affect testing. When trans-fats were first introduced, corporations battled to get them onto our grocery shelves. It is only decades later that this once novel food has been proven to be extremely unhealthful. This could be a glance into the future of GMO’s. It is similarly a concern that GMO’s in food are causing an increase in allergic reactions. The process of genetically modifying a plant or animal adds new proteins that weren’t indigenous to the original plant or animal, causing an allergic reaction increase when ingested in the human body. Also, some GMO foods have had antibiotic features added to them so they are resistant to certain diseases and viruses. When humans eat them, these antibiotics features persist in our bodies and make actual antibiotic medications less effective. Toft goes on to say that GMO’s are banned in more than 60 countries around the world including, the European Union,…
Manipulation of plants and animals to produce more desirable traits is certainly nothing new. In fact, the process of plant and animal breeding has been around almost since the time that humans evolved from hunting and gathering to farming. Animal breeders breed one type of dog, for example, with another, to combine the desired traits of both, and the results are called “cross-breeds”. Plant breeders cross one type of plant that may be high yielding but not drought tolerant with another that is drought resistant but doesn’t produce a large crop, to create a “hybrid” plant that offers both desired qualities in one.…
Many people are against Genetically modified foods because of the unknown long term effects and environmental effects. There were concerns about how GMO’s can affect other animals. “ GMOs may be toxic to non-target organisms, bees and butterflies being the most talked-about examples currently. Bees are hugely important in the pollination of many food crops.” (Emily Glass) If this true, this can be the biggest reason why GMO’s should be banned. Another reason how it could affect the environment is by making it a monoculture in our ecosystem. “When GM crops are planted, generally in a monocrop fashion, many heritage seeds are no longer used. The nature of GMOs means fewer weed flowers and, therefore, less nectar for pollinators. “ (Emily Glass.) Having a monoculture can result in quicker spread of diseases and can cause an economic disaster. They’re many possible consequences of genetically modifying foods but most of the possible consequences are predictions or theories.…
In past years, genetically modified organisms also known as GMOs have replaced our diets with genetically altered foods, which have adversely affected the health of humans and local communities. GMOs are organisms that have been created through the gene-splicing techniques of biotechnology (also called genetic engineering, or GE) (EFSA). GMOs have been around for many years; it wasn’t until just recently that most people have become more and more concerned about them. Consuming these genetically altered and processed foods can lead to increased risk…
I’m going to tell you why it is so bad to have gmo foods in the world that we live in.I’m against GMO foods because it is not healthy and it won’t end too well if they make that happen. Gmo foods are not good for the human body. It can cause cancer, allergies, and other side effects it can damage your environment. Environmental Damage…