Preview

Arendt's Statement About Having A Group In A Representative Democracy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
342 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arendt's Statement About Having A Group In A Representative Democracy
Arendt dispute with Nussbaum statement about having a free and equal person be in charge instead Arendt challenge Nussbaum that having a group in a representative democracy is more affected than one person being equal. When people who are interested in the issue they make it possible for everyone to contribute to the idea of solving the problem. For example in the communities there’s lots of disliking between each one because of what they do and sometimes the hate can turn really nasty, like getting into violence terms. Communities can form groups and heal meetings for everyone to come and make them settle their differences. “No matter what the specifically national tradition or the particular spiritual source of its ideology, totalitarian government always transformed classes into masses, supplanted the party system, not by one-party dictatorships, but by a mass movement, shifted the center of power from the army to the police, and established a foreign policy openly directed toward world domination” (852).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Correct. The English nobility gained the most benefits from the Magna Carta, which established limitations on the power of the king.…

    • 2223 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison asserts factions are detrimental to the government because they tend to cause chaotic discourse between those involved, thus not accomplishing anything. Citizens that are concerned about their government do not want factions, and they are willing to lawfully combat against them. Madison also asserts that governments should be admired, but he acknowledges that it would be incorrect to say governments are absolutely flawless. He also acknowledges how people find it unfair that the majority tends to be favored over the minority. The majority is not always right because it…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pluralist democracy works with numerous organised groups who all have some political power in the decision-making setting. It assumes that it’s ‘neutral’ government who listens to, and acts on the outcomes of these competing interests. Thus the large number and operation of pressure groups is considered to be a vital element in the promotion of pluralist democracy.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He states that to remove the causes that provoke the development of factions you either destroy the liberty which is essential for political life (“liberty is to faction what air is to fire”), what could be unwise, or make each person in the society think in the same way and have exactly same opinions, what could be impracticable.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The source argues that in the name of protecting civil liberties, the mass people have too much of a say over things, and that those strong leaders in power do not "get a chance to serve the common good." The ideology presented in the source is that a single, strong leader provides more stability than a democracy. The source presented advocates in favour of a collective, authoritarian form of government. The philosopher Thomas Hobbes would have supported the source by referring to society's need for a "leviathan" or centralization of power, since he believed that people were incapable of governing themselves. However, this source is not a complete rejection of the values and principles of liberalism as it still maintains democracy as the system of government used, and democracy is…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In James Madison’s, The 10th Federalist, Madison believes that in a nation a larger republic is safer and more efficient than that of a smaller republic. James Madison answers the question of how to eliminate the negative effects of faction. He defines a faction as, “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a minority or majority of the whole, who are untied and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.” Madison believes the most serious source of faction is the diversity of opinion in political life, which leads to dispute over fundamental issues such as what system of government or religion should be preferred. Madison states that, “A pure democracy can admit no…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Is it possible to conceive of a political system in a modern mass society in which all citizens who desire could participate equally in the making of public decisions?…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does democracy require equality of income and wealth? Does majority rule undermine freedom and threaten individual rights? What was James Madison's view, and what is your reaction?…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    B.) In the Pluralist theory citizens play an important role in politics. They can form groups and promote their interests (interests groups). In Elitism theories, citizens have a limited participation because of the unequal share of power, in the sense that others are favored more and those citizens in this are limited of expression.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Madison, the principle of popular sovereignty is a way of preventing power gain by the minority factions. Majority factions are the most problematic .the solution is checking the camps by preventing the existence of similar interests and passion amongst a large number of people over the same period alternatively rendering the majority unable to work. Madison makes a conclusion that it is difficult for a little democracy not to share the same passions. The reality that republics may…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    De Tocqueville and Mill both cite the possible oppression of minority groups as a significant drawback to democracy. While each author cites the 'tyranny of the majority' as a possible problem, their perceptions of the alleged problem differ in scope and definition. De Tocqueville regards the above mentioned problem largely as a hindrance to actual action on the part of minority groups and individuals; Mill discusses it relating primarily to the oppression of minority thought. De Tocqueville recognizes the ability of the government to regulate thought, but does not focus on it to the extent that Mill does.…

    • 982 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Factions’ right to hold opinions, no matter how controversial, should not be infringed upon, but majorities should not be given unregulated power over the polls. A “well constructed” Union is the mode of controlling the faction, it would allow for the wisdom of officials to discern the best path for their country. Overall, Madison makes solid arguments on the benefits of a representative, constitutional republic and displays an understanding of the inherit cruelty of human…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist number ten quote states "A pure democracy can admit no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority, and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party. Hence it is, that democracies have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." This quote represents that if power is rooted in the will of the majority, there is nothing to stop the majority from plundering and oppressing any minority. Since there will always be more incompetent and lazy men than brilliant and hard-working men, it…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Paper 10

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madison goes on to say that these effects could be controlled easier in a larger society with a representative democracy rather than a small society with direct democracy. The factions in different states would be able to balance out each other; therefore, if one faction tried to disturb the country, it would not disrupt any of the other states. Madison also explains that representative democracy would be the best way to keep control over factions without completely eliminating liberty.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sole interest of those in charge defies the meaning of democracy- Aristotle and mob rule- only vote in leaders, don’t have a right over the policies involved- although the meaning of democracy is often contested, it is widely accepted that freedom and equality have a place in democracy. How can this be said with elitists in charge.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays