Preview

Madison's Views On Factionalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
588 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Madison's Views On Factionalism
The definition of a faction by Madison is a certain number of inhabitants, regardless of whether they are the minority or majority, whose union exists because of shared passions, or interests, these interest are in contrast to the rights of other citizens. Madison takes a stance that there exist two methods for limiting damages from the factions that are the removal of the causes of the faction or having control over the camps. He proceeds further and says that there are two ways of eliminating the factions. One being the elimination of liberty which is an unacceptable action and creation of a similar opinion and interest in the society that is practically impossible since the cause of the factions is as a result of freedom in the society Madison makes a conclusion that limitation of the damages from the factions is through control of their effects.
According to Madison, the principle of popular sovereignty is a way of preventing power gain by the minority factions. Majority factions are the most problematic .the solution is checking the camps by preventing the existence of similar interests and passion amongst a large number of people over the same period alternatively rendering the majority unable to work. Madison makes a conclusion that it is difficult for a little democracy not to share the same passions. The reality that republics may
…show more content…
He is of the assumption that human nature is inherent in conflicting interests. He wants to evade an instance where a single group controls the decisions of the society. Majority principle alongside free elections will shield the nation from dictatorship. There exist checks as well as balances so as to ensure that there are several points of entry into the government and numerous ways of offsetting the powers that one branch of the government possess. Madison has an awareness that preservation of state governments will be of assistance in maintaining liberty and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He favored central power, national rights, etc. By the 1790s however, Madison's views seemed to change drastically. He became a stronger advocate of states' rights, and began to interpret the constitution more rigidly. As can be seen in Madison's message to Congress regarding an Internal Improvements Bill, March 1817, Madison explicitly states that he can not favor the bill, because there is no power expressed in the Constitution which gives him the right to do so. Therefore, Madison, like Jefferson was not firm in his beliefs either. (Document…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison asserts factions are detrimental to the government because they tend to cause chaotic discourse between those involved, thus not accomplishing anything. Citizens that are concerned about their government do not want factions, and they are willing to lawfully combat against them. Madison also asserts that governments should be admired, but he acknowledges that it would be incorrect to say governments are absolutely flawless. He also acknowledges how people find it unfair that the majority tends to be favored over the minority. The majority is not always right because it…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He feared that the majority would get together and unite around one policy issue and they could oppress the minority. James Madison developed the principal architect to the American government which had sometimes been referred to as the Madisonian system. Madison proposed that as much control be placed beyond the control of the majority as possible. His plan placed only the House of Representatives within direct control of the votes of the majority. A small minority, not the people themselves, elected most government officials.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They each had their own set of solutions. Madison understands that factions cannot be eliminated (recall Federalist 10) where he provided the two methods in which they can be removed. First, one would have to destroy liberty - which is counter to a democratic society (and would not work). Second, he suggested that the only other way to destroy factions within a society was to provide each person with the same set of opinions, ideals, and beliefs. Again, counter to a free society.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does democracy require equality of income and wealth? Does majority rule undermine freedom and threaten individual rights? What was James Madison's view, and what is your reaction?…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison begins his paper by stating a strong argument for the Constitution is the fact that it gives the government the capability to control the violence and the damage of factions. He says, "Among the numerous advantages promised by a well-constructed Union, none deserve to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction". Factions, described by James Madison, are groups of people who get together to protect their special interest and opinions.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam 2 Notes

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Wants reader to approve ratifications of constitution. If we can eliminate the cause (freedom, or making everyone equal) of factions, we won’t have them. Somewhat practical. If you cannot remove cause, control the effects. Form democracy.…

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Madison's view, the multitude of interests work to discourage the formation of an oppressive interest (divide and conquer?).…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    10, Madison presents a purpose of representation that is significantly different from Mill – representatives should “refine and enlarge the public view, by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens . . .” (Hamilton 58) – much less of a direct democracy. He believes in the importance of representatives being accountable to their constituents, but not to the uber-pluribus extent argued by Mill. A representative should be tied closely enough to his constituents to understand all of their views, but should not follow their every wish. The representatives, through deliberation, can come to an understanding of the public view that is not based on “temporary or partial considerations” (Hamilton 59).…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pols 1

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As individuals the way in which the beliefs and values of our political orientation is acquired is an important part of how our government is. The viewing of this political socialization in the people of the U.S. electorate is particularly important. If the individuals that are involved have more of a tendency due to their political socialization towards their own preferences and ideals with little regard to public opinion or with the mind to pray off the knowledge that public opinion is vulnerable to media and public polling, then the Madisonian Model of government is being detracted from. Adversely, if the individuals comprised of this body's political socializations have them more aware of public opinion and of the downfalls and sometimes misrepresentations of the media and public polling, then the Madisonian Model of government is being added to and strengthened. As we remember from Mike's previous lectures, this form of government works off of the ideas of the separation of powers, checks and balances and presidents restricting themselves to the powers allotted them in the Constitution.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Papers

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Madison suggests that a republic is better than a democracy at controlling the effects of a majority faction (or a direct democracy in modern language). What are the “two great points of difference” that give republics an advantage over direct democracies?…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of James Madison's many contributions to The Federalist Papers was an essay that outlined his vision of Congress as a body of chosen individuals that the public could submit their ideas to for debate, refinement, and, ultimately, implementation for the public good. Through the use of a party system we can align with a representatives who’s ideals and principles…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    They believed that a large republic was vulnerable to divisions that would undermine national unity. Their reasoning was an extension to their desire for a homogenous community. While it is true that a nation works best when its populace is united in support of the common good, it is imperative to understand how “impracticable” and “unwise” it would be to eradicate factions. According to Madison, factions are an inevitable result of the liberty granted to citizens to express their views in public. The danger with such internal divisions is not so much their causes, but rather their effects.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over past centuries there have been many different opinions, philosophies and approaches to government and politics demonstrated throughout the world. As time continues and humanity evolves, these approaches and opinions often change, yet their root philosophy, or ideological foundations, often remain. A political ideology can be defined as, “ a science of ideas: the study of the origins, evolution and nature of ideas… the application of human reason to economic, social and political changes”[1]. This notion of a classic ideology influencing modern government is not an exception for that of the United States. Through the study of the “Father of the Constitution,”[2] James Madison, it is most evident that this document he created was shaped around an ideology greatly influenced by classical political philosopher, John Locke. Madison incorporates Lockean philosophies of natural law and role of government with a democratized systematic approach, thus establishing a Constitution largely based upon the ideology of the Neoclassical Liberal Democratic Theory. The influence of this ideology is evident within three fundamental aspects of the American Constitution: the division of powers and federalism, the notion of checks and balances, and the process of the judicial review. Locke’s natural law supports the notion that individual freedom is an essential right, while his opinion of the role of government, in its most vital duty, is to serve, represent and protect the people. Madison, however, did not agree with Locke’s vision of human nature, denying his opinion in that humanity is generally good. Conversely, Madison did not trust the public, understanding human nature to be selfish, aggressive and unchangeable. Still, such as in Locke’s natural law, Madison believed that people had the right to some sort of self government and therefore aspired to create a government, “… guided by an enlightened and benevolent elected aristocracy, that would protect the interests of the…

    • 2665 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political Parties Essay

    • 1238 Words
    • 2 Pages

    his Federalist Paper 10. Madison writes in the paper that “Faction is human nature. The most…

    • 1238 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays